Image 01 Image 03

Putin Makes it Easier for Russia to Use Nuclear Weapons When Attacked

Putin Makes it Easier for Russia to Use Nuclear Weapons When Attacked

Putin signed a new nuclear doctrine after President Joe Biden allowed Ukraine to use American-supplied longer-range missiles to hit inside Russia.

Russian Dictator President Vladimir Putin signed a new nuclear doctrine after President Joe Biden allowed Ukraine to use American-supplied longer-range missiles to hit inside Russia.

The new doctrine states “that a conventional attack on Russia by any nation that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country.”

Yup:

The signing of the doctrine, which says that any massive aerial attack on Russia could trigger a nuclear response, demonstrates Putin’s readiness to tap the country’s nuclear arsenal to force the West to back down as Moscow presses a slow-moving offensive in Ukraine.

Asked whether the updated doctrine was deliberately issued on the heels of Biden’s decision, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the document was published “in a timely manner” and that Putin instructed the government to update it earlier this year so that it is “in line with the current situation.”

Putin first announced changes in the nuclear doctrine in September, when he chaired a meeting discussing the proposed revisions.

Moscow claimed Ukraine fired the first of those missiles this morning:

Moscow says Ukrainian forces have taken advantage of President Biden’s green light and launched 6 U.S.-made ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile Systems) into Russian territory Tuesday.

Russia says it shot down five of the missiles and damaged the sixth. It added that debris landed in the area of a Russian military facility, but that no casualties or damage beyond a small fire.

Ukraine did not immediately confirm the use of ATACMS on Tuesday, but officials did announce an attack on a military facility in Russia’s Bryansk region, the same region where Moscow says the missiles fell.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 3
Virginia42 | November 19, 2024 at 9:02 am

This has pretty much always been part of their doctrine–going back to the 70s and 80s.


 
 0 
 
 5
jimincalif | November 19, 2024 at 9:14 am

It’s going to be a long two months til Jan 20.


 
 3 
 
 1
Whitewall | November 19, 2024 at 9:42 am

Putin ‘ fires’ 10K N. Korean troops into Ukraine. Ukraine responds with American missiles. Putin can pack up and leave Ukraine and send the NORK troops home. It’s over..

“Moscow says Ukrainian forces have taken advantage of President Biden’s green light….”

Ha ha. The senile bed-wetter in the White House doesn’t even know what a green light is.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Idonttweet in reply to Paula. | November 19, 2024 at 12:44 pm

    I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask the administration if they are intentionally trying to trigger WWIII and drag America into it, just so they can leave an even bigger pile of sh*t for Trump to deal with. I still want to know who is making these decisions, approving these actions and blaming them on Biden.

Time for Americans to take cognizance of Russia’s Perimeter System, also known as “Dead Hand.” There is a book by that name and a Wikipedia entry. It’s and automatic or semi-automatic system nuclear response system similar but not identical to the “doomsday machine” in the film “Dr. Strangelove. Dead Hand originated in the 1980s by the Soviet Union out of fear that the US would decapitate the Soviet leadership with preemptive First Strike. A not unreasonable fear. See Fred Kaplan’s book, “The Bomb.” Yes the Pentagon had plans for a preemptive strike on the Soviet Union. There is a whole literature on this subject for the curious. Not clear if there is any humans in the Dead Hand response loop.

I’m sure under current conditions Dead Hand is active and contributes to instability. There are some in our State Department unaware of Dead Hand. Ask your Senator if he knows about it. Yikes some journalist should ask the chairman of the Joints Chiefs.

How would we feel if an adversarial country had offensive missiles in Mexico? Well we know, see the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. This is a vast subject. Americans should be very concerned.


     
     0 
     
     1
    NotCoach in reply to oden. | November 19, 2024 at 10:26 am

    Plans are not the same thing as action. We have/had plans for the invasion of every single country in the world. It is an academic and military exercise in preparedness, not an intention to actually invade.


       
       0 
       
       0
      ahad haamoratsim in reply to NotCoach. | November 19, 2024 at 11:44 am

      I just finished reading Daniel Silva’s novel, The Collector, that revolves around a Russian security directive to turn those plans into action by making a false flag low yield nuclear attack on a small Russian town near the Ukrainian border Gabriel Allon, now retired, stumbles across the plan while investigating a stolen painting.

      Spooky to come across this news report after reading the novel.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Virginia42 in reply to NotCoach. | November 19, 2024 at 1:02 pm

      You’re assuming the Russians know that.


         
         0 
         
         0
        GWB in reply to Virginia42. | November 19, 2024 at 1:22 pm

        They do. Anyone in the world who is paying attention knows that.


         
         0 
         
         0
        henrybowman in reply to Virginia42. | November 19, 2024 at 1:24 pm

        I know that, so there’s no reason the Russians shouldn’t. The doctrine is called Threat. It considers the possibility that even your strongest ally will snap and become your enemy, so you have to have plans on tap for war with anybody. It’s why allies continue to spy on each other. Trust me, they know about it.

The adults being back in charge cant happen soon enough!

Putin is blowing smoke for domestic consumption,….he ain’t gonna nuke anything, except his political career

Biden and Trump meet and make happy talk while Obama’s fifth columnists launch a diplomatic end run scorched earth gambit.

Macron is backing the gambit saying it’s good policy.

Trump needs to speed armistice negotiations.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.