California Teacher Lashed Out at Student for Wearing Trump Hat on Election Day and Called for Security
“Can you send security up? I have a boy who has a Trump hat on and I’m not going to tolerate it today”
This story takes ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ to a whole new level. Scary even.
FOX News reports:
California teacher lashes out at student wearing Trump hat on Election Day, calls for ‘security’ to remove him
A California high school teacher lashed out at a student wearing a Trump hat in his classroom on Election Day, saying he was “voting for a freaking rapist” and calling for “security” to come remove the student from his classroom.
Corey DeAngelis, senior fellow for the American Culture Project, obtained an audio recording of the incident, which happened at Chino High School in southern California on November 5.
“A child molester, huh? Vote for that freaking rapist,” the teacher says to the student in a clip posted to X. “I have a daughter, three nieces, and he’d rape them, and people are voting for him. Christians are voting for him, a bunch of losers. Fake Christians.”
“Just do the warm-up, I’m p—–. People voting for a freaking rapist and I’m p—– off,” he continued. “I don’t care, fire the hell out of me. I’m fighting for my daughter, my nieces, their rights.”
“Turn it off and go back to your freaking seat now! Go!” he shouted at the student before making a phone call to remove the student from the classroom.
“Can you send security up? I have a boy who has a Trump hat on and I’m not going to tolerate it today,” he said.
“I don’t care if you have a Harris hat or a Trump hat, you’re out of here. You know better. Then tell [Principal] Miller ‘I should have the right to vote for a rapist and a child molester,’ go for it. I don’t give a F!” the teacher continues to berate the student.
“Tell [Principal] Miller that you’re allowed to wear a freaking rapist hat. Go for it!” he challenged the student. “Tell your mom. Get out of my class. You can’t take a teacher that stands up for girls’ rights.”
The teacher continues to rant that voters wanted to “get rid of 20 million immigrants” but Trump should actually leave the country because Native Americans “own this land.”
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Child abuse. On the part of both the teacher and the student’s parents for sending him to a government school.
And, you ASSume the parents can afford private school, or can live on one income will one of the parents homeschools.
The whole story may be about school policy barring the wearing of hats in the classroom, but this teacher went overboard making it political with a profanity laced, anti-Trump rant, calling Christians losers, etc., and calling (presumably) armed security officers to remove the student from class.
This person surely does not appear fit to be in a classroom exercising any power or authority over students if he can’t keep his emotions in check and gets this triggered over a hat.
Though he did say, somewhere in the rant, that you can’t wear Harris hats either. But that was like an aside.
A modicum of common sense might have been tugging at his mind that he had gone too far and was trying to even out the outrage. Not even close to enough. That person should never be in a classroom if he is that unhinged.
Yes, he did, as an apparent afterthought. The point remains that he didn’t like the political speech of the student and thought it was appropriate to use the power of the state, backed up by force and an implied threat of violence, to suppress that speech. Who the wearer supported by wearing the hat is irrelevant. The teacher’s own words reveal the political motivation of his actions.
At some point it may become necessary to start beating the f*ck out of these deranged c*nts.
Teachers are supposed to teach without bias… as they set examples of how adults are supposed to act in a civil society. All I see since teacher’s unions have become militant is woke ideologues trying to indoctrinate other people’s children to join the Marxist revolution.
I’m not sure about California (it’s weird, after all) but in most states saying someone is a rapist is libel (or slander) per se. If he decides to consult a lawyer, the teacher may find out that lie is rather expensive.
Even if Trump weren’t a public figure, to sue this guy he’d have to prove that he isn’t a rapist. The onus of proof would be on him, not on the defendant.
But he is a public figure, so he’d have be able to prove not only that he’s not a rapist but that this guy knew for a fact he’s not a rapist. Since the guy very clearly does believe that what he said is the truth, Trump would lose.
Besides which, you seriously think Trump’s got time to sue this guy?!
Leave a Comment