Doug Emhoff Doesn’t Address Story About Hitting Ex-Girlfriend, Calls It a ‘Distraction’
So can we now say anything salacious in Trump’s past is just a distraction?
There have been three stories about Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff’s past with women; none are good.
- The Second Gentleman’s “Missing” Love Child Becomes A Campaign Problem For Kamala
- Report: Harris’s Husband Doug Emhoff Allegedly ‘Forcefully Slapped’ Ex-Girlfriend
- Harris’s Husband Doug Emhoff Accused of Being a ‘Misogynist’ at Law Firm
Joe Scarborough portrays Emhoff as the victim with the questions about the controversies.
Emhoff doesn’t deny anything. Instead, he calls them a “distraction.” So gross:
SCARBOROUGH: [Trump] Saying that tabloid stories about your personal life, saying should be front and center. He’s saying it about your wife and making incredibly crude and lewd suggestions about her past life. I’m just curious. I know I seem like a very zen mindful person, but I think I’d be pissed off, and I’m just wondering. How do you all stay centered? How do you stay disciplined and not really go off? And not really push back hard at these things?
EMHOFF: We don’t have time to be pissed off. We don’t have time to focus on it. It’s all a distraction. It’s designed to try to get us off our game.
SCARBOROUGH: Does it get you off your game now?
EMHOFF: No. All we are doing, all we talk about is this election. We understand the stakes. We understand the responsibility. We understand the account. What are the…our very country. Our future. What kind of future are we going to have?
Second Gentleperson "Doug" calls the allegations that he struck his ex-girlfriend in the face "a distraction." pic.twitter.com/7RkRPmM1Zj
— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 11, 2024
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
he probably was paying her for that “privilege”
Slapping was the treatment for hysteria. It’s a closed fist that you don’t use on women.
how about if attacked by a female trained and/or mma fighter
or if you have ever seen street brawls where females are the attackers
Or tickled by one.
You need to up your female misogyny. You can do better. Remember, most of the editors here on LI are incredibly smart females. You are a loser in so much as you blame women for everything. Get a life, or crawl back under your rock No woman would ever be your wife or girlfriend.
SOMEONE’S been taking their testosterone supplements with their soy milk, haven’t they?
Get the hell out of here.
“Female misogyny” is redundant, JR. Don’t you claim to be a lawyer?
I thought he meant women who hate other women.
Doug Emhoff: “ The bitch deserves it.”
JR: “Shame on @destroycommunism for distinguishing the difference between a slap and a closed fist.”
In your comment, you fail to point out that Emhoff hit the women, but an LI commenter is the misogynist.
Except that is NOT why he slapped her, so your comment, as usual, has no value. Much like the slapper’s wife.
Ex-girlfriend. He is just moving forward, unburdened by the past. Dems don’t have “pasts” to live down.
Emhoff, Walz, Obama. Role models, but for what?
Toxic Non-masculinity.
He’s the poster child for Tiny D Energy. I bet the girls called him Little Finger in school.
Proof: He took sloppy seconds from Big Willie B
They didn’t dare let Mika question him because they were afraid she’d get bitch slapped.
“they were afraid she’d get bitch slapped”
But by which one??
Well, a jury found former President Trump liable for sexually abusing a woman, so most people would probably find that worse than striking an ex-girlfriend. And Emhoff isn’t running for President.
No, they found him liable for defamation.
Why lie??
No, they found Trump guilty of civil, not criminal, of sexually abusing a woman. There are about 5 million Internet sites about this.
LOL. You really are a caricature of a human being, “JR.”
Right, civil and not criminal because the evidence was so flimsy no person would vote to convict anyone over it. A civil trial requires the hazy memory of a crank and a jury hating the defendant enough to go along with it.
Liar.
Remember all those commercials a few elections back about the president answering the 3 am phone call? Well Kamala can’t answer the phone if her abusive husband is beating her, can she?
“The call… on the Red Telephone…
it’s coming from inside the house!”
Scarborough or Stern could not have said it better. They, too, have TDS and are filled with hatred. Perhaps a new version of the Three Stooges, with apologies to Moe, Larry, and Curly.
Most people wouldn’t believe a lunatic like E. Jean Carroll. I bet you believed Blasey-Ford too.
Especially since she was bankrolled in her suit by a far left billionaire specifically to get Trump on something. That broad has crazy written all over her.
At least now we know why Kamala needed a Glock
who would have thunk Scarborough would not ask hard hitting questions about woman beating.
Mika was not available for comment.
Dougie has some eclectic tastes in music. Wonder if this one is in his library – https://youtu.be/0ElVgflreT0?si=pmG_fvEJMY_CIept
I was pretty sure it wouldn’t be “Hit Me with Your Best Shot” because Emhoff ain’t got one.
Nothing a Leftist does can ever be held against him/her/it. They are protected by absolution from the Party and the Ministry of Agit-Prop.
Subotai Bahadur
“It’s a distraction.”
Clearly, if the demonrats steal the election and anoint harris, it will be barry’s 4th term (or that of the cabal that operates through him; assuming he would survive another four years).
Nevertheless, there needs to be “someone” in charge of the “face of the Presidency”. Blinken, Sullivan, … who knows perhaps Rice, Nuland, Powers, Sunstein, Garland, Weissman, McCord, et al will all be reinstated to pursue wars, lawfare, destruction of the Constitution and erosion of basic “rule of law, and OWG/WEF(UK Commonwealth) stuff … but someone more competent than jill needs to control the “puppet president”.
Could it be that kamala is viable because doug is competent (in a consistent albeit psychotic, morally corrupt and perverse way) ?
Is a vote for kamala actually a vote for a misogynistic, toxic, white, male … like bill only much less likeable and not “p*ssy whipped” ?