Image 01 Image 03

Trump ‘Willing to Do More Than One Debate’ Against Harris

Trump ‘Willing to Do More Than One Debate’ Against Harris

“I think if you’re in the Democratic nominee or Republican nominee, you really have an obligation to debate.”

Former President Donald Trump told reporters he’d participate in more than one debate against likely Democrat nominee Vice President Kamala Harris:

“I would be willing to do more than one debate, actually,” Trump said on a call with reporters, two days after President Joe Biden in a stunning move dropped out of the election contest and endorsed Harris as his replacement atop the Democratic ticket.

“Yes, absolutely, I’d want to” debate Harris, the Republican nominee said.

“I think if you’re in the Democratic nominee or Republican nominee, you really have an obligation to debate,” he said.

“So, it’s very important,” said Trump, who was formally nominated last week, two days after narrowly avoiding being killed in an assassination attempt at a campaign rally in western Pennsylvania.

Trump also said ABC should not host the debate:

“I’m not thrilled about ABC because [of] fake news I watched last night,” Trump said. “They’re actually trying to make a hero out of Joe Biden when he was the worst president in history, and they were doing things like with Kamala, like what a wonderful thing that she is running.”

“I don’t like the idea of ABC.”

Trump also said he expected that his debate against Harris would have the same result as his debate against Biden.

“I want to debate her and she’ll be no different because they have the same policies,” Trump said.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

destroycommunism | July 23, 2024 at 4:40 pm

this time they wont even give him a mic

Oh please do, we need to hear Kamala word salads as much as possible. And talk to the country like we all are 5yo.

    thad_the_man in reply to Skip. | July 23, 2024 at 5:32 pm

    The best possible line from the debate:
    “I don’t understand what she said, and I don’t think she does either.”

    MarkJ in reply to Skip. | July 23, 2024 at 10:52 pm

    Trunp would hammer Kammie like a tenpenny nail in a debate.

He should agree to the same conditions as the debate with Biden.

She’s highly inarticulate, has radical views on a host of subjects.

Her own candidacy in 2020 was so inept that a 90 second thrashing by Tulsi Gabbard was enough to push her out before a single vote was cast.

You can’t help but think that she’s being set up to fail by party insiders. She checks too many intersectionality boxes to just push her out, they have to allow her to self immolate.

What then? Do the D’s throw in the towel to fight another day in 2028 when there will be no Trump?

Only time will tell.

    Ironclaw in reply to Peter Moss. | July 23, 2024 at 5:26 pm

    I concur, having that Mike silenced and the split screen really was Biden’s downfall. Kamala will not fare any better in that regard because while she might not trip over her words as often she doesn’t know how to use them.

    thad_the_man in reply to Peter Moss. | July 23, 2024 at 5:32 pm

    Just better moderators.

wonder what she will “unburden” us with?

E Howard Hunt | July 23, 2024 at 5:04 pm

TRUMP IS GOING TO LOSE TO THIS IDIOT.

Once again, the white ladies strike.

    Ah yes, because no white ladies are conservatives or carry? I am this close to being over your misogynist rants. Newsflash: conservative women are not the same as elitist leftie harridans. If we apply your logic, no white man can be trusted as POTUS because Jimmy Carter sucked (and so did Wilson, FDR, and pretty much all white male presidents except Reagan). Stop being a repulsive, illogical clown, please. I really am reaching my limit on this crap.

      Thank you!

      chrisboltssr in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | July 23, 2024 at 5:29 pm

      This is the problem with our country. People get too offended over words.

      I disagree with Edward, but are we going to pretend the most loyal group to the Democrats are not woke, single, white women? Woke, single, blank women are the second most loyal group.

      Learn not to be offended by other people’s words. Or country will be better off for it.

        Or we can take his actual words at face value. He’s one of the ones here who advocates repealing the 19th Amendment. This discussion isn’t happening in a vacuum, Chris, and I am not replying to this ONE post. I’m pretty much done with the whole repeal the 19th thing, and I am issuing fair warning. Deal with it.

          chrisboltssr in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | July 23, 2024 at 8:17 pm

          So, he says repeal the 19th Amendment and your first position is to get mad? Why don’t you debate on the merits of whether the 19th should be appealed as opposed to reflexively saying you’re going to potentially ban someone for having a different view?

          Also, based on your initial response I determined there was history here but I still stand by what I said.

          destroycommunism in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | July 23, 2024 at 10:28 pm

          ?

          “fair warning”

          he is showing who he is and yeah there are blocks that *only* vote a certain way

          he cant come up with a logical way/reason to change that fact

          censoring ( I take it thats what you mean) only makes his point stronger

          and reinforces the fact that he is having you use emotion over logic

          just think about it

          take care

    destroycommunism in reply to E Howard Hunt. | July 23, 2024 at 10:21 pm

    just fyi

    white males are closer to losing the right to vote

    than white women

retiredcantbefired | July 23, 2024 at 5:43 pm

Blank women?

ABC question of Harris? “As a former prosecutor, how does it feel to be running against a convicted felon?”

Let’s face it 40% of democrats will vote for people who hide in basements and have strokes and can’t talk,

THEY. DONT CARE..

It’s the cheat with ballots and illegals voting that scares the hell out of me

Harris is a good debater. She’s a lawyer and totally unconstrained by the truth.