Trump’s Ear Wound From Gunshot Confirmed By Dr. Ronny Jackson – BlueAnon Hardest Hit
A significant faction of the Democrat/Media industrial complex thinks (a) Trump staged his own assassination attempt, and/or (b) was not really hit by bullet in the ear, at most he was hit by flying glass.
A significant faction of the Democrat/Media industrial complex thinks (a) Trump staged his own assassination attempt, and/or (b) was not really hit by bullet in the ear, at most he was hit by flying glass.
Dr. Ronny Jackson, Trump’s former White House physician and a current congressman, released a report on the wound confirming it was a bullet wound, came within one-quarter inch of killing Trump, and is still healing. Trump posted Jackson’s letter on Truth Social.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
And Milquetoast will opine as to how it’s just a superficial wound.
Nothing to see here. No dead, no foul. Move along.
You’re misrepresenting what Milhouse said, regarding the inaccurate title of the article (https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/07/anthony-fauci-assassination-attempt-on-trump-no-big-deal-since-an-ear-wound-is-superficial/) that LI published earlier today.
I’ve posted many times before to say that although I would like to refer liberals to this website for its (usually) excellent articles, I don’t do so because of the comment sections.
I will add in Millhouse defense
The MSM media is notorious for cherrypicking and editing statements. I hope that the NY post did not do the same. Likewise I hope that legal insurrection did not also edit and / or cherrypick the statement for dramatic effect.
If someone has the link to the full interview, so that we can see for ourselves before judging
Thanks
https://x.com/simonateba/status/1814465483694879076
He fabricated and acted like usual. His false words:
“He was asked whether we should suspect the Trump campaign is covering something up and he correctly said that while that was possible there was no reason to suspect it.”
Nowhere in the interview is this found or insinuated, despite the above assertion of fact.
Untrustworthy. A pathetic display.
Either you’re dishonest or you’re thick. That is the entire point of the question. He asked him whether the public deserved to know more than the Trump people were telling. That is a coverup. Fauci didn’t fall for it, and said there’s no reason to suppose there’s anything more than is publicly known.
No, Mr. “Truth.” You are the one that fabricated with your nonsense. So easily exposed, too. And then you wet your pants with disparagement. Good job!
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/18/health/dr-sanjay-gupta-analysis-trump/index.html
Here is the link to Gupta’s inane ramblings.
I have searched CNN for about 15 minutes and I can’t find the video of Fauci, they probably memory holed it because he did say that Trump could be brain damaged like Gupta did.
Look above. The link is to the entire 5 minute interview.
It is your comments that might turn off people, one example claims that all Muslim warts should be glossed over because you had a doctor who was Muslim.
Oh no, guys. Moonmoth won’t refer his communist internet palz to LI.
They can’t read a blog because they might get the vapors over the comment section? Give me a break. What a bunch of pussies.
“I’ve posted many times before to say that although I would like to refer liberals to this website for its (usually) excellent articles, I don’t do so because of the comment sections.”
Then perhaps you should tell your snowflake p*sscake “liberals” they shouldn’t read the comments.
Actual liberals would welcome the exchanges, even when they turn obnoxious. As if progressive comments smell of love.
That’s very strange to not recommend a site because of the comments. Don’t read them as I don’t on a number of sites I go to.
You wrote: “I’ve posted many times before to say that although I would like to refer liberals to this website for its (usually) excellent articles, I don’t do so because of the comment sections.”
We’ve seen your prior statements, as well as this one, and will continue to not care one tiny bit.
It is a superficial wound. That’s simply an indisputable fact.
Yes it is – thank God! BUT, that doesn’t make it any less SERIOUS! Had he not turned his head just a fraction of a second sooner we would not be discussing a “superficial” wound – it would be just how much of his head was blown away! Don’t make light of the fact that the DEMOcrats MISSED! Anyone with a shred of decency should be OUTRAGED at the thought of Joe’s political rival was the TARGET of an ORGANIZED ASSASSINATION! And before you jump on that claiming it was just some nerdy kid, go watch the various videos where people have analyzed the SOUNDS and the overwhelming evidence of TWO very different rifles being utilized! No amount of “legalizing” can change the SOUNDS from TWO different weapons! AND before you try to excuse this away as being distorted, there are TWO videos from different vantage points and BOTH show the same results – First THREE shots from shooter #1, next FIVE from shooter #2, and then the SS Sniper’s shot! But go ahead!
A quarter of an inch? Come on, man!
Close enough for government work.
What’s the difference between Trump and Biden?
Trump nearly died. Biden is nearly dead.
Trump is aware of it.
Biden is not.
Has anyone informed Jim Morrison?
You CAN petition the Lord with prayer….
Hardest hit so far…
http://www.nurembergtwo.com
They pretend it was a paper cut. That is why they are rejected. Keep talking.
This time too close from government work. Fauci misses the picture… AGAIN… the psychological issues of attempted murder. Let me put Fauci under the Chinese Water Torture and then claim…no harm done.
On a special note….. As Trump’s plane departed Milwaukee the tower gave the plane clearance to take off and recited Numbers 6:24-26.
The next move will be, “oh, not that doctor.”
He was also Obama’s doctor. Funny thing, I googled him to make sure my recollection on that was correct, and the first thing that popped up was an article from 2020 where Obama was chastising him for pointing out Biden’s already then obvious mental deterioration. That didn’t age well.
“Dr. Ronny” lacks gravitas, like “President Jimmy”
Of course the Marxists would try and smear DJT
FWIW, the thing about flying glass came from Butler PD. It’s not surprising it turned out to be wrong. So was almost everything else “everybody knew” in the first few hours, like the identity of the shooter.
It was a theory put out that was wrong and retracted. It actually doesn’t make much sense if you look at the location and direction etc but much was speculation so I’ll not fault the Butler PD putting it out there as a possibility. If Trump was facing forward or in the other direction and the bullet hit glass a piece might have jumped up and whacked his ear
I’d like to suggest to those who believe it was staged, hire a 20 year old. Get him a gun in caliber .223. Stand 140 yards away and let him fire the weapon while you time moving your head at the exact split second where the bullet only hits your ear instead of your head.
At 20 I was in the military and a pretty darn good shot with a 5.56. That shot, imho, could not have been made intentionally by anyone. That it’s floated out there and repeated shows how little most people know about firearms and shooting. I even read one place where there was a guy on the water tower behind that 20 yr old. Several hundred yards behind him. So? An unsupported shot from that distance and angle is even more difficult.
The injury to Trump’s ear is not as trivial as some people have suggested. The passage of a supersonic bullet through the tissue at the top of the ear would cause a shock wave that damages tissue within about an inch or more of the bullet’s trajectory. Any deer hunter has seen this kind of damage.
The whole upper half of Trump’s ear is likely damaged and swollen, and it probably hurts like hell. It will take a couple of weeks to heal. I also wonder what the supersonic shock wave did to his hearing. I hope he can still hear through that ear.
I’m surprised more people are not bringing this up. It’s highly likely Trump would lose some hearing in that ear or at least have ear drum damage however the 55 or 62gr 5.56 being used is not that big a round.
Deer hunters use expanding bullets and the ear is too thin for a bullet to expand. Unless cartilage is extremely susceptible there should be little surrounding injury, but I couldn’t easily find that information on the internet. I can say from personal experience that getting stitches in your ear does hurt like hell.
At, say, 2500fps the bullet would pass by the head in less than a millisecond. I doubt that could cause significant hearing damage.