Image 01 Image 03

Anti-Israel Protesters Swarm Manhattan, Target LaGuardia After NYPD Blocked Them at JFK

Anti-Israel Protesters Swarm Manhattan, Target LaGuardia After NYPD Blocked Them at JFK

One car hit an officer as he directed traffic. The officers allowed the group to pass!

UPDATE

The dumbs have moved to Manhattan while others drive to LaGuardia after the NYPD blocked them at JFK.

One car hit an officer as he directed traffic. The officers allowed the group to pass!

Down in lower Manhattan…

The police have not arrived. The anti-Israel/anti-Jew protesters are causing a mess for tourists.

Yes, they’re chanting, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

JFK Airport

Last week, the anti-Israel/anti-Jew groups said they would block Terminal 4, a departure terminal, at JFKL airport on New Year’s Day.

They kept their word. Even the NYPD asked everyone to arrive at JFK earlier than normal because of these stupid protests.

Thank goodness for the NYPD. The department placed checkpoints around JFK, keeping out the dumb.

They don’t exactly blend in.

LOL!

Within Our Lifetime, today’s main antagonizers, tried to claim victory because only ticketed people can enter JFK airport.

What a bunch of losers.

CRYING.

Now, they’re aiming for LaGuardia Airport and Wall Street.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Let them protest and then jail them, is the right order. Also do it for every traffic-blocking protest, not just this bunch.

    Olinser in reply to rhhardin. | January 1, 2024 at 3:52 pm

    The radical leftist DAs refuse to prosecute them, so this is the only thing the mayor can order them to do, because he knows just how much these lunatics piss people off.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to rhhardin. | January 1, 2024 at 4:37 pm

    Arrest after they are hit with one or more rubber bullets. They need to go out knowing that they will suffer some pain. Also,, make sure that every mask comes off and they are identified, that way implorers can avoid hiring them.

      broomhandle in reply to JohnSmith100. | January 1, 2024 at 5:48 pm

      I am interested in this idea: what is the legality of the police de-masking and photographing law breakers on-site during an arrest? That would be an awesome policy.

        The Gentle Grizzly in reply to broomhandle. | January 1, 2024 at 7:18 pm

        They can hide behind the old, tried and true, “someone fitting your description was seen at a hold-ups so we need to be sure whether or not it’s you” excuse.

        amatuerwrangler in reply to broomhandle. | January 1, 2024 at 8:24 pm

        I don’t know NY law, but on the Left Coast…. CA law is that a warrantless search of a person is allowed when that person is under arrest. Even if it is an offense that may be suitable for citation release in the field. A person has to be identified before any release is done, and viewing and photographing the face is part of that identification.

        In mass arrest events we photographed the individual along side the arresting officer and included an arrest number. That way, once the person went into the wagon and on into the system and the officer back to bag another, the link was established for court.

        Milhouse in reply to broomhandle. | January 1, 2024 at 8:30 pm

        As far as I know NY still has a law against wearing masks in public.

      Crawford in reply to JohnSmith100. | January 2, 2024 at 6:21 am

      Why rubber?

    CommoChief in reply to rhhardin. | January 2, 2024 at 10:59 am

    No. Do not ‘let’ the protest unlawfully. Order them to disperse and upon refusal to comply begin arresting them. That’s two charges. If they don’t submit to arrest that’s a third charge. If one ‘protestor’ attempts to prevent LEO from making an arrest that’s a fourth charge. If they used a vehicle that’s a fifth charge; impound the vehicle as evidence. Depending upon the jurisdiction the vehicle might be subject to forfeiture. Then there’s the possibility of some active warrants being discovered. Then the potential for visa overstay and other immigration violations which trigger deportation.

    Civil disobedience is not supposed to be free from consequences. To the extent it is viewed as ‘noble’ it is due to the risks and consequences of the action. The current era of ‘let folks take over the streets largely without any consequence’ b/c social protest is somehow viewed as automatically good is Cray Cray. Return the risks and then these folks can perform a risk to reward analysis. I suspect they dry up when max penalties arrive.

I’m so tired of the obnoxious, bullying and fascistic antics and agitprop of these utterly vile, goose-stepping, Muslim supremacists/Islamofascists and their non-Muslim, dhimmi and Dhimmi-crat enablers and allies.

I would expect New Yowkas would know how to handle these obstructionists — namely, run them down.

BierceAmbrose | January 1, 2024 at 4:22 pm

Today, at the unsullied beginning off a new year, I am filled with love and accommodation for people of all dispositions.

When people systematically, repeatedly, aggressively demonstrate that they are uninterested in the compact of civil society, we should accommodate them. (See, that was kind. Really.)

ThePrimordialOrderedPair | January 1, 2024 at 4:24 pm

I don’t like the way this was handled. They inconvenienced innocent people in order to not have to deal with the America-hating scum. They should have run things as usual, with enough cops at and around the airport to quickly arrest and jail anyone and everyone who tried to disrupt people’s freedom of movement and had a DA who understood his actual job and indicted all of these scum for false imprisonment and a thousand other charges (with counts for an estimate of every single person they affected) and put them all away for the rest of their unnatural lives (along with civil liabilities that ruined them and their families).

That’s what should have happened … but this is New York. They just stopped the scum from getting to the airport so they’re still running around free to cause the same problems elsewhere, while the DA is busy trying to jail Trump for a BS accounting accusation that is past the statute of limitations and an AG who is trying to steal all of Trump’s properties because she claims that a billion dollar property is only worth 18 million.

Yep …

    While J6 people did not receive justice, these people do deserve J6 style injustice.

    while the DA is busy trying to jail Trump

    Wrong DA. Queens County DA is Melinda Katz, Curtis Sliwa’s ex-girlfriend, and not a radical leftist. As far as I know she has not done anything to Trump, nor shown any intention of doing so.

      ThePrimordialOrderedPair in reply to Milhouse. | January 1, 2024 at 9:57 pm

      I was taking poetic liberty and you well know it.

      Give us all a break for a bit, will you. You can start your annoying routine up after the new year gets rolling.

      Sheesh.

I think that public humiliations is a Hong Kong style or old fashioned stocks lining a road, with concession stands featuring rotten stuff, would be perfect for these people.

Steven Brizel | January 1, 2024 at 6:56 pm

They should be all arrested and deportation proceedings commenced against those who Are not citizens

    Milhouse in reply to Steven Brizel. | January 1, 2024 at 9:18 pm

    I doubt the courts would allow deportation simply for blocking traffic. And if it’s not the general policy to deport all aliens who block traffic, regardless of the reason, then doing so to these people would be unconstitutional.

      ThePrimordialOrderedPair in reply to Milhouse. | January 1, 2024 at 10:00 pm

      It’s not “simply [] blocking traffic”. It’s “false imprisonment”.

      And legal aliens are only here so long as they are well-behaved guests. The minute they misbehave we have every right – and are generally obligated – to throw them out.

      “simply [] blocking traffic” … get a friggin brain.

      “Un-Constitutional”?? LOL. Yeah … aliens have some sort of Constitutional right to be in America … sure.

      What a moron.

        You’re the moron. It is clearly established law that it is unconstitutional for the government to take any action against someone, even an action that would otherwise be legal, if it is done as punishment for the person having exercised a constitutional right. If these people are deported while people who have done the exact same thing for some other cause are not, then the deportation would be because of the opinion they expressed, and that is unconstitutional .

          ThePrimordialOrderedPair in reply to Milhouse. | January 1, 2024 at 11:09 pm

          That’s just incorrect.

          The US government is made to serve the interests and protect the rights of AMERICANS. No one else. The rest have their own governments to protect their rights and the rest have their own homelands where they have the right to live in. They are only in America as our guests and only so long as we deem them worthy of being guests.

          The Founders would be appalled, to put it mildly, at your utter lack of respect for the notion of citizenship and for the purpose of the sovereign government.

          America is not property of the world.

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | January 2, 2024 at 1:38 am

          Primordial, I don’t give a shit about your feelings, and neither does the law, or the constitution.

          The freedom of speech is absolutely not reserved for US citizens. Anyone who claims otherwise is arguing against the constitution.

          And it is black-letter law that nobody disputes that the government may not retaliate against anyone for their protected speech, even by doing something that would otherwise be legal. The USA need not allow a foreigner into the country if it doesn’t like that person’s speech; but once here the person is fully protected by the first amendment, and it is unconstitutional to deport him for what he says.

          If you don’t like that you can go jump in the lake, but it will remain true. And if you claim this is not the law, you’re a liar.

          CommoChief in reply to Milhouse. | January 2, 2024 at 11:19 am

          They can exercise free speech by penning a letter to the editor, post on a blog. When they or anyone else seeks to disrupt society using unlawful means that has now moved out of speech into illegal activity. There should be no disagreement that consequences must follow from those illegal actions.

          If protestor X is a visa overstay or otherwise illegally present in the US or if lawfully present but the criminal actions he undertook are a violation of the terms of the forbearance of the Fed Govt for an ‘asylum’ claim being adjudicated ….that’s tough titty they should be deported. Not for speech but for their criminal conduct.

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | January 3, 2024 at 12:16 am

          CommoChief, if someone breaks the law they can of course be punished for that, but only to the same extent that is usual for that offense; they cannot be punished in a way that is grossly over what is usual, merely because the government disapproves of the sentiments they intended their offense to convey. Of course the government violates this principle regularly, but not in so blatant a fashion as this would be. Deporting someone for so minor an offense as blocking traffic is unusual enough that the courts would probably call it excessive even if there were no first amendment issues involved; doing it only because of their message would definitely be struck down.

      ahad haamoratsim in reply to Milhouse. | January 2, 2024 at 8:47 am

      Material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization.

        Huh? What material support have they given, and to whom? Blocking traffic is not material support to anyone.

          It is showing that they have the ability to act without any negative consequences whatsoever. It is showing that a mob can shut down any aspect of society it wishes to, when it wishes.. It shows the world that the ‘rights’ of a mob carry more weight than the rights of law abiding citizens.
          As for their right to free speech, let them say what they will but that does not give them the right to interfere with another person’s right to freedom of movement, for example.
          I thought a person’s ‘right’ can be exercised up until it interferes with the rights of another citizen? Is this wrong?
          It is a splendid PR campaign for showing the world the power of islam. And that most definitely will garner them ‘material support’.

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | January 3, 2024 at 12:18 am

          Lexi, none of that is material support.

      Steven Brizel in reply to Milhouse. | January 2, 2024 at 8:56 am

      If you are a foreign citizen in the US on a visa that allows you to attend an American university, that visa requires you to obey American law-if you violate that law you should be deported

        Milhouse in reply to Steven Brizel. | January 2, 2024 at 9:39 am

        Nevertheless, if the government is only deporting you because of the opinion you were expressing by blocking traffic, and it would not have deported you had you been expressing some other opinion or none at all, then that is unconstitutional.

        See the Brooklyn Museum case. NYC is not required to fund the museum at all. But having funded it, it could not decide to stop doing so because it didn’t like an artwork the museum displayed.

      JohnSmith100 in reply to Milhouse. | January 2, 2024 at 1:06 pm

      Lots of Dem shit is unconstitutional and even worse, like treason. The pendulum is to far one way, it now should swing too far our way. These people deserve a strong dose of what they have been dishing out. If they can get away with J6 type conduct, then maybe we should do the same, at least until the things are balanced out.

    ahad haamoratsim in reply to Steven Brizel. | January 2, 2024 at 8:46 am

    Disbarment for those licensed to practice law.

I’m an outflanker… which means I 100% LOVE that they are doing this … in NY and LA.

Think about it- they are inconveniencing people who literally hate America almost more than they do. All of Satan’s little helpers hanging out together beating each other senseless. I don’t instigate bum fights on skid row, but if one is happening I’ll gladly watch.

Delay is corrosive to the rule of law. The best approach the NYPD could do to keep this under control is arrest people breaking the law at the moment they do, detain them, transport them back to the station, book them, check for outstanding warrants, allow them to stay overnight until their bail hearing the next day, tow their car to the impound lot, etc… If ten people break the law and get away with it, you wind up with a hundred, then a thousand or more. If the *first* person to break the law is arrested and their car towed, the second person is going to be a little more cautious, and by the time you get down to the fifth person or more, a lot more law-abiding gets mixed into their behavior.

Profoundly disturbing to sit here in Europe and see this happening in the States. Sadly it is clear who is in control. It seems the government, local, state and/or federal can/will no longer protect the rights of its citizens. It appears it would rather bend to the desires of mob rule. A society cannot sustain itself like this. This should have been shut down hard by whatever means necessary. What are the authorities afraid of?

    The authorities are sympathetic to the antisemites and the BLM/antifa mobs. They are only afraid of good, decent Americans.

      Agreed. Which begs the question: why do good decent Americans put up with it? Why are there no counter protests demanding an end to this mob rule? Is it lack of leadership or lack of will? Or are average Americans just too comfortable in their own lifestyles to risk anything to make a stand? The country is eroding daily and yet the sheep continue to graze.

Steven Brizel | January 2, 2024 at 9:01 am

Unfortunately, the settelement agreement by the City https://legalaidnyc.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/1099-2-Settlement-Agreement.pdf has tied the hands of the NYPD behind its back in enforcing the law with respect to protests that become riots

Steven Brizel | January 2, 2024 at 9:17 am

https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-7-part-b-chapter-4 Any student on a visa that is a member of any of the Hamas sleeper groups and has participated in acts of criminal violence against the Jewish community should be deported “because he or she has violated the terms of their visa which incluide “Obedience to all laws of U.S. jurisdictions which prohibit the commission of crimes of violence and for which a sentence of more than one-year imprisonment may be imposed

The Real Truth | January 2, 2024 at 3:00 pm

As a person who has studied World History, I am not shocked by what is taking place today. The Muslims are doing exactly what I thought they would do after October 7th. Instead of criticizing what happened to the Israeli people by Hamas on October 7th, they are just fine with it and actually blame Israel. Muslims want to change the world into a Muslim world and instill Sharia Law. They have NO interest in OUR way of life, and they don’t respect it. Every single country in the world where they have become the majority becomes totally Muslim. They either convert you or kill you if you refuse. This is not a Religion in my opinion more of a dangerous Cult !