Biden: ‘I Believe That a Woman’s Right to Choose is Fundamental’
“At the federal level, we need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.”
Our devout Catholic president, ladies and gentlemen. Not only does he support abortion but he urges people to vote for pro-choice officials.
“At the federal level, we need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.”
Disgusting.
Biden reaffirms that "a woman's right to choose I fundamental" & argues "basic fairness and stability of our law demand that it not be overturned."
If it is, Biden says his admin will be prepared to respond & raises the stakes for midterm elections. pic.twitter.com/PZ07AJ9mBN— Jeremy Diamond (@JDiamond1) May 3, 2022
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
“Pro choice” is a leftist word trick which hides the nature of the “choice”. We should consistently refer to them as “pro abortion rights”.
Just call them “pro baby killers!”
Yes. That’s the correct term.
No, it is not. Foetuses (foetii?) are not babies.
If you want her baby, you can have what comes out of her, you can keep it alive as best you can and you can pay to feed and raise it. Don’t demand that of women, they’re not your baby carrying slaves to dictate to.
Fetus is a technical term of art to social distance abortionists from their victims. In even the most uncivilized jurisdictions, there is no open right to elect abortion of a human life, in privacy, if you can get away with it, let alone under a semblance of law.
You are a liar.
It’s not a dog, it’s not a cat, nor a car.
It is a human being. Those that murder babies are correctly identified as baby killers.
“Don’t demand that of women…”
Define women, diaperpoop.
“Foetuses (foetii?) are not babies.”
You loons are so pathetically laughable and mentally ill.
You are incapable of defining what a women is, mush less a simple one like a baby in the womb.
OTOH, I’m quite sure your mother went around for nine months describing you as a fetus.
Whomever told you it was safe to go out without a helmet did you a disservice. Put it back on and strap it.
She chose to get pregnant, and if she chooses that she’s responsible for the results. She’s not allowed to murder, and anyone else involved is an assessory to the crime.
Everybody on earth knows what position they take on abortion, just like everybody knows what they think about men who dress up in women’s clothing and call themselves transexuals. And yet a candidate being interviewed to be a justice on the Supreme Court is allowed to get by without revealing her positon, “I can’t answer that. I’m not a biologist.”
That’s the most insulting thing I have ever heard.
Actually I simply call them “pro-death” and leave it at that; Once you dehumanize and normalize the killing of unborn children it’s a small step to justifying the killing of those that are born.
“Devout Catholic” Joe Biden.
“Devout Catholic” any Democrat. The slaughter of the most innocent is central to being a Democrat.
It’s just a term they use—much like Romney and Collins calling themselves Republicans. Or Elizabeth Warren calling herself an Indian. Or Michael Brown’s mother saying he was a good boy.
Well, come on, man. When they pull the string on Biden’s back, he says whatever was on the little record they stuck in his belly that morning. He’s no more or less involved than that.
“Devout Catholic” Joe Biden.
Don’t forget. Anti-pope Francis has stated that Joe Biden is a “good catholic” so that makes it ok, right? RIght?!??
And Wayne LaPierre ruled that Harry Reid was a “Hero of the Second Amendment.”
Sometimes, shiny badges come out of cereal boxes.
…Except for his underage female relatives?
There’s another possibility. What if the leaker is a clerk for one of the five. A warning shot across the bow intended for that fifth voter, the one who might be shaky. “Stay with us or your name will be Benedict Arnold.”
The leaker would reason that suspicion would fall immediately on the Wide Latina and her clerks, meaning he/she (or even they) might get clean away.
There’s a possibility it might rain tomorrow. But the possibility that the leaker is a clerk is more likely than that.
There is a chance this could be a thing.
However given the one sided way leaks have happened these last 6 or so years it makes your suggestion very hard to believe as having happened.
You also believe we should have no borders.
He also believes Hunter is “the smartest guy” he knows.
Hunter just may be!
Joe has to believe in something. For example, “10% for the Big Guy” or
“I believe I’ll have another pudding.”
“I believe in a woman’s right to choose.”
Those are weasal words with a great deal of spin. In a free country, everybody should be able to choose. They should be able to choose whether their children are taught about sex in kindergarten and they should have a say in CRT and many other things that Democrats are attempting to stop mothers from choosing,
But no person should be able to choose whether another person should live or die. That’s not making a choice—that’s something else entirely.
What we need to find is a woman who chooses to assassinate the president. Like another Squeaky Fromme, but a competent one. Because hey — it’s her “right to choose.” Joe just said so.
Roe wasn’t the law of the land for over 150 years, so didn’t “basic fairness and the stability of our law demand” that it not have been adopted in the first place? Obergefell wasn’t the law either, until it was; didn’t the same considerations mean it shouldn’t have been adopted? Take this to an extreme and no court should ever change anything, because of “basic fairness and the stability of our law”.
Yeah, it’s always interesting how Roe is wrapped up in stare decisis and thrust up as an example that precedent must never be overturned because reasons….. but I don’t see anyone on that side of the argument demanding that Plessy v Ferguson be reinvigorated. If precedent must not be overturned because reasons, then where are the d/prog protesters demanding a return to separate but equal. Oh wait, they kind of are with CRT/Equity and segregated dorms, ceremonies, classes and workshops in University and some aspects of the workplace.
Let’s try another one. They are more than happy to have Obergefell overturn Baker v Nelson. So the d/prog ‘commitment’ to the idea of a sort of ‘one and done decision’ which can never be revisited is awfully damn situational at least in most respects.
Alito’s opinion contains an extraordinary two-page footnote listing all the cases in which SCOTUS has overruled precedents.
Yeah I read it last night. I was attempting to be humorous in my selection of those two precedent to illustrate how the argument for ‘eternal stare decisis’ seems very situational for the d/prog true believers in Roe.
No logic just emotion for them; it’s nearly a religion as it displays an orthodox set of beliefs with some displaying vestments (pink psy hats and hand maiden get ups) a hierarchy (planned parenthood local and national chapters) and of course ritual sacrifice.
Remember the fundamental rule of the left: the one-way ratchet. Stare decisis is always absolute when it comes to protecting progressive causes, and must always give way when it impedes progressive causes.
Good points all, Milhouse. Very good.
read the draft decision. it points out specific arguments used in ROE that lead to it’s wrongful adoption. then it destroys, in detail, one by one, each of those arguments. i learned a lot reading this draft and believe you will too.
The need for absolute confidentiality of the status of any matter under advisement is drilled into the head of every employee of the judicial branch–I remember it well from my time clerking for a bankruptcy judge and later a district judge.
Biden’s statement was characteristically short-sighted, made no mention of this horrific institutional breach, but dwelled instead on the Administration’s preferred policies and the need to elect pro-abortion politicians.
Why would you entertain the possibility that Biden or his handlers would act on principle?
Biden acts on the principle of the “See ‘N’ Sat” teleprompter. It’s sCiEnCe (optics)!
“See ‘N’ Say,” dammit.
He was probably lead astray due to earpeice malfunction.
Sometimes Biden smiles for no reason at all. He is responding to the earpeice.
Google “Lovense.”
Devout Catholic?
I’m sure he understands that he will be rewarded according to his work.
More fundamental than the three branches of government? Or are we seriously pretending this leak wasn’t politically motivated?
I believe in a woman’s right to booze. (With her husband’s permission of course). Women would be a lot happier and more powerful if they just accepted they were men’s property.
Can’t figure out what thumb to vote. Sweating spaceman meme!
How come he doesn’t want to give everyone that same right on an airplane? Maybe (and this is just a guess) he is a senescent, autocratic dipshit?
Well, I identify as a woman today and I don’t want a fucking covid jab. So suck my (female) dick, Joe Biden*
I’m pro-choice on guns…let’s get more Senators and reps that are also pro choice on guns.
Forget choice… buy them all.
You mean a birthing person’s right to choose, don’t you, Slow Joe?
Douglas was pro-choice to, good thing our party produced Lincoln so we would remove the right to choose to own a slave.
The Democrats mirror the “they aren’t human” argument today (while hypocritically claiming the slavery side being wrong was so obvious at the time we must tear down our history).
The future will look on today as the abortion era.
Slavery, diversity, political congruence, redistributive change, and the wicked solution a.k.a. planned parent/hood.
“woman’s right to choose”
How in the Wide World of Sports would President Pudding Cup know what a woman is? He’s not a biologist, y’know.
C’mon man! It’s the thing, ya know?
So now we know what a woman is?
Abstinence, prevention, adoption, and compassion, and self-defense through reconciliation. The nominally “secular” Pro-Choice “ethical” religion, not limited the wicked solution a.k.a. planned parent/hood, denies a woman and man’s dignity and agency, and reduces human life to a negotiable commodity. Deja vu.
When SCOTUS inserted itself into the abortion debate, it was a morality decision that usurped the prerogatives of the legislature and the church by grasping at the straws of implicit protection of liberties instead of the explicit protection of the Constitution or even common law. In other words, it was political decision to appease a vocal segment of the population.
In doing so, it opened the door to every measure of human frailty and fallibility from a disproportion affect on minorities to institutional eugenics and established a precedent that disassociated ones actions or inactions from their consequences on oneself or society as a whole.
In jumping into the political fray, SCOTUS demonstrated not only the weakness of their legal reasoning but that they lacked the wisdom to insert themselves into a morality issue. High time to remedy this decision.
And yet his belief that a woman has a right to choose will whiplash right back around if asked if they have a right to choose *not* to be vaccinated with an experimental drug.
Yeah, the hypocrisy is real.
I support a woman’s right to choose whether to wear a mask. Whether to have a vaccination. Whether to consent to sex. Whether to purge her body of a parasite.
That popular anti-parasite drug Ivermectin? “Not safe for use by pregnant women”.
Besides the fact that everything you have to say is on par with the mentally ill, define “pregnant women”.
Bonus question: What are they pregnant with?
“Bonus question: What are they pregnant with?”
Pauses?
More pregnant pauses than a Harold Pinter play.
Parasites, apparently.
Nuke them from space, I guess.
Delight?
Regret.
MRNA vaccines aren’t safe for pregnant women either. Infertility and miscarriages are a huge problem.
Is he a biologist? How can he be defining what a “woman” is if we’ve been told for years that men can get pregnant too.
In 1994 Biden stated he was opposed to abortion. In fact, he wrote a later confirming that and claiming he had voted against abortion funding “on no fewer than 50 occasions”.
Heretic! How did you avoid the Memory Hole?
Nina! Nina! A 27B stroke 6, to the Department of Works, right this minute!
First, define what a woman is, pedophile.
Joe’s right, a woman’s right to choose is fundamental. There are just so many concealed carry options it’s difficult to pick one.
+10
“Devout Catholic” Biden, no worries, Commie Pope will go along.
Biden (2022):
“I Believe That a Woman’s Right to Choose is Fundamental.”
Biden (1986):
“Abortion is wrong from the moment of conception.”