Image 01 Image 03

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Admin Effectively Ends CDLs for Illegal Aliens

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Admin Effectively Ends CDLs for Illegal Aliens

Meanwhile, California revokes 13,000 improperly issued CDLs after federal showdown.

The last time we reported on Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) and the illegal aliens who own them, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy had just ordered more than 550 commercial driving schools to close after discovering numerous violations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)’s safety standards.

However, the move to reform the CDL system continues.

Earlier this month, the California Department of Motor Vehicles met the federal government’s demand and revoked approximately 13,000 non-domiciled CDLs. A non-domiciled CDL is a commercial driver’s license issued by a state to a driver who is not a permanent resident in that state or in the U.S., but theoretically is legally authorized to work or reside there temporarily.

How it actually worked was an entirely different story.

A legal struggle session occurred before the cancellations, clearly showing Blue State resistance to rules designed to keep Americans safe.

After an investigation uncovered thousands of improperly issued licenses, California agreed to cancel 17,000 of them by January 5, 2026, but later extended the deadline to March 6 without federal approval. U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy then called the move illegal and threatened to withhold $160 million in federal highway funds. Meanwhile, advocacy groups filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of 20,000 affected drivers, arguing the DMV’s own mistakes caused the problem.

Still, the Trump administration persisted….

Meanwhile, the federal government was not standing still. Under 49 CFR 384.307, FMCSA [Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration] withheld approximately $160 million in federal highway funding from California for noncompliance — and beyond that funding threat, FMCSA holds authority under federal statute to fully decertify California’s CDL program if the state is found in substantial noncompliance, which would prohibit the state from issuing, renewing, or upgrading any commercial credentials, not just non-domiciled ones. For a state with over 700,000 CDL holders, that threat was not an abstraction.

California found itself pressed between a federal government threatening its entire CDL infrastructure on one side and advocacy groups demanding it protect drivers’ rights on the other. The state accused federal regulators of “moving the goal posts,” arguing it had been ready to reissue corrected CDLs since December but that the federal government kept changing its compliance standards.

In the final days before March 6, a Bay Area court issued a ruling in Doe v. Department of Motor Vehicles requiring the DMV to allow drivers with cancelled licenses to immediately reapply. But that ruling gave with one hand and took away with the other. While the court ordered that the DMV must accept non-domiciled CDL applications, the department remains prevented from actually issuing non-domiciled CDLs until FMCSA lifts its mandated pause. All applications will remain pending for a maximum of one year while the DMV waits for federal authorization to act on them.

The D.C. Circuit denied California’s emergency stay request that would have allowed the state to reissue corrected credentials without risk of federal retaliation. With every legal avenue exhausted and the funding already gone, California cancelled approximately 13,000 licenses effective March 6.

And now, the rules governing the issuance of nondomiciled CDLs have been substantially updated, adding new restrictions. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has recently implemented a new set of rules titled “Restoring Integrity to the Issuance of Non-Domiciled Commercial Drivers’ Licenses.”

The new rules went into effect last week. Because of the requirements, 200,000 non-domiciled CDL holders won’t be able to renew or update their CDLs.

The FMCSA expects they’ll all be gone within five years.

FMCSA’s February rule on non-domiciled CDLs zeroes in on its logic in eliminating the credential: There’s no good way to vet most non-citizens and state licensing agencies just aren’t that good at evaluating federal work authorization documents.

Under the new rule, only a few categories of business visa holders can be issued a non-domiciled CDL — H-2A temporary ag workers, H-2B non-ag workers, and E-2 “treaty investors.”

FMCSA estimates that of some 200,000 non-domiciled CDL drivers, the rule in effect today will eliminate approximately 194,000 CDL drivers.

For years, lax oversight allowed individuals with questionable credentials to operate massive commercial vehicles on America’s highways — a safety risk hiding in plain sight. We have covered a number of tragedies that have occurred because the consequences of ignoring commonsense requirements never entered into the calculations of progressive bureaucrats and woke politicians.

Now, after federal pressure, lawsuits, and plenty of political theater, a deadly loophole is finally closing.

Once again, California’s devotion to “inclusivity” collided head-on with the federal government’s duty to protect public safety.

This time, at least, safety won.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 13
D38999 | March 27, 2026 at 7:19 am

Does this mean no more Quality CDL Learing Centers?


 
 0 
 
 16
Peter Moss | March 27, 2026 at 7:21 am

Long ago I held a CDL at the time when the federal government had recently revised its requirements.

It was pure hell getting through the examination as the nice state trooper was as inflexible as the creases on his uniform. That the test could be completed in any language other than English is impossible.

So I will shed no tears for those who are losing their jobs today because they fraudulently obtained a license designed to keep the public safe from morons operating a forty ton hunk of metal going 75 mph.


 
 0 
 
 11
MoeHowardwasright | March 27, 2026 at 8:02 am

I had a CDL with a Hazmat designation back in the 80’s. It was not an easy test. Everything was in English, as it should be. In fact all states should be mandated that all drivers license categories be tested in English only.


     
     0 
     
     2
    diver64 in reply to MoeHowardwasright. | March 27, 2026 at 2:48 pm

    I have a CDL with all the endorsements and have hauled pretty much everything going down the road. It has always been the law that a CDL holder must be able to speak and understand English, it just wasn’t enforced. Now, under Trump and Duffy, it is.

wanna put a stop to this,..start enforcing 8 USC 1324, especially,
8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B)(iv)


 
 0 
 
 0
MAJack | March 27, 2026 at 8:25 am

Let me work at convenience stores! (s)


 
 0 
 
 3
guyjones | March 27, 2026 at 9:01 am

“Sure,” say the vile stupid and vile Dhimmi-crats — “Let’s hand thousands of illiterate, safety-indifferent illegal aliens 80,000-pound trucks to toy around with, on our nation’s highways! What’s the worst that could happen?”


 
 0 
 
 6
jeffrey | March 27, 2026 at 9:03 am

“For years, lax oversight allowed”

Why can’t we just have a civilization where people earnestly strive to do a good job?


 
 0 
 
 2
CommoChief | March 27, 2026 at 9:17 am

How about adding a couple restrictions on all work and student visa:
1. No work visa grant to any employment that doesn’t require a MS (not MA) or PhD in a field with a.demonstrated lack of qualified applicants.
2. No student visa for any undergraduate program or training program.


 
 0 
 
 0
isfoss | March 27, 2026 at 9:27 am

Does CA have any rogue judges on hand?

You really should understand the language when you are faced with signs you do not understand.

I recall driving in Quebec and being really frustrated because I did not understand the signage.


     
     0 
     
     0
    henrybowman in reply to ParkRidgeIL. | March 27, 2026 at 1:08 pm

    Hah! Despite my HS French “flooency,” I remember driving in Quebec and being frustrated because of the LACK of signage. Barreling down the superhighway from Toronto to Quebec, being caught up short upon encountering a train, crossing traffic at ground level — something they never do in the USA. The only warning was an “RR Crossing” sign close by the tracks, which was at least a half mile beyond the bumpers of the stopped cars you were about to plow into.


     
     0 
     
     0
    diver64 in reply to ParkRidgeIL. | March 27, 2026 at 2:56 pm

    I understand your frustration having spent a great part of my life driving in and through Quebec but there are only a few words in French on signs you really need to know. Arret, Sud, Nord, Est, Ouest and so on. By International Treaty, all highway signs share the same shape and international symbols. A stop sign there is an 8 sided, red sign.. It is here, England, Italy etc.

‘Pajeet. What’s that sign say??’

‘It say No U-Turn.’

‘U-Turn here, Pajeet!!’

***kills family of four***

This policy crackdown against illegal aliens is a good thing, but unless Congress criminalizes employers hiring illegal aliens, and criminalizes state governments providing those illegals with credentials, they will all simply wait for another administration to reverse it all back to business as usual, so they can hire cheap labor who will kill more people.


     
     0 
     
     0
    destroycommunism in reply to LB1901. | March 27, 2026 at 12:12 pm

    and yet that commonsense is ignored

    b/c then the gov would have to go after itself

    thats why

    military
    courts
    treasury

    the only jobs for the government

Was one American’s life worth it? Surely two would be enough to take action? Three? Four?

In 2025 alone, at least 30 people were killed in 17 crashes involving “non-domiciled” commercial drivers, according to DOT.


 
 0 
 
 3
destroycommunism | March 27, 2026 at 11:19 am

funny theres these stories out there on how trump is cozying up to the trucker industry b/c “enforcement is down”

the left has its spin on this story and as usual its not pretty

Shouldn’t any lawsuit be lodged against the STATE that issued the CDLs to ineligible?

Also looks like testing procedures should omit phones, hearing devices, etc if not all ready done.


 
 0 
 
 2
DSHornet | March 27, 2026 at 11:31 am

Years ago it was accepted that commercial truck drivers in America were considered trustworthy, safe drivers, and (as John Wayne once said) the modern knights of the road who were willing to help someone in distress. I don’t know about y’all but I noticed the last decade or so a trucker may or may not observe speed limits, lane discipline, or turn signal usage. It’s not as common now that a trucker will thank me for flashing my brights to say “Come on over, the lane is clear”. If we get back to those days, it will be very good.
.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Crawford in reply to DSHornet. | March 27, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    There have always been crap drivers. My dad’s stories about some of the drivers he worked with are proof of that. Having to get an ambulance to take one out of the break room because whatever drugs he’d been taking had locked him up, immobile and unresponsive, for example.

    But most didn’t have ZERO concern for life, and didn’t grow up learning Third World driving habits.


     
     0 
     
     1
    GWB in reply to DSHornet. | March 27, 2026 at 1:06 pm

    I was scrolling down to comment….
    Back in the days when logs were called “scandal sheets” and truckers often tried to skirt the rules to get their load delivered in a timely fashion, it feels like truckers were much safer. Now, all the trucks have GPS and computer logs, forcing them to pull over for some sleep and such. And, yet, by letting in people who don’t grasp nor even care about the rules (or the safety of others) things have become much more dangerous on the roads.

    I loved driving cross-country when I was young precisely because of the culture of helping everyone along that truckers brought to the highways. I had a CB and I used it. I knew the signals (lights, hands) to use with the trucks and how to respect them.


 
 0 
 
 1
Arnoldn | March 27, 2026 at 12:48 pm

A particular statement caught my eye “California found itself pressed between a federal government threatening its entire CDL infrastructure on one side and advocacy groups demanding it protect drivers’ rights on the other.”. Were the said advocacy groups demanding protection for the rights of all the drivers on the highway to have the reasonable expectation of sharing the road with other drivers with a certain level of operator competency or were the advocating for just those non-residents (legal or illegal) wanting to obtain a CDL whether qualified or not? I suspect the latter.


 
 0 
 
 0
henrybowman | March 27, 2026 at 1:11 pm

“A legal struggle session occurred before the cancellations, clearly showing Blue State resistance to rules designed to keep Americans safe.”

They don’t care if you’re safe. They just care whether you have money, and whether they can acquire it.


 
 0 
 
 0
diver64 | March 27, 2026 at 2:51 pm

The federal government needs to pull all authority to issue commercial drivers licenses from the states. Since CDL holders are subject to FMCSA then the Feds should be in charge. Period.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.