College Religious Exemptions Bill in Utah Sparks Academic Freedom Concerns on the Left
“It’s not about getting out of learning new things. It’s about having to do things that violate your conscience.”
If leftists aren’t allowed to indoctrinate students freely, their academic freedom is being infringed. That’s the train of thought here.
The College Fix reports:
Utah college religious exemptions bill prompts academic freedom concerns
A Utah bill that would expand religious accommodations to college classroom assignments has prompted skepticism from some academics, with one calling the legislation too broad and another questioning its impact on critical thinking.
The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Michael Petersen, passed its final vote in the Utah House on Wednesday, after the Senate approved it earlier this month. It now heads to the governor for his signature.
Petersen introduced the bill earlier this year after he said his daughter found herself faced with a difficult situation in college. As an assignment, her professor had the class advocate for pro-LGBT ideology by writing a letter to a local lawmaker, Petersen told The Utah Statesman in February.
“She called and said, ‘Hey, Dad, I’ve got an assignment. I’m supposed to write a letter to my legislator advocating on behalf of LGBT policy,’” Petersen told the newspaper. “That’s compelling someone to speak. We have a First Amendment on purpose.”
Of his bill, the Republican lawmaker said: “It’s not about getting out of learning new things. It’s about having to do things that violate your conscience.”
Petersen drafted House Bill 204 to make it easier for students to obtain exemptions from assignments that would violate their “sincerely held religious and conscience beliefs.” It would require professors to offer reasonable accommodations, by either excusing their participation or offering an alternative assignment.
Petersen’s office did not respond to two requests for an interview from The Fix, asking about the legislation and his daughter’s experience.
Meanwhile, University of Utah Law Professor Clifford Rosky, when asked if there are potential benefits to the bill, told The College Fix that they appear to be limited…
On the other hand, a professor with the Utah Valley University chapter of the American Association of University Professors found the “religious or conscience belief” language to be too vague and open to interpretation.
“The bill referred to ‘activities’ a number of times and we found that a bit too broad,” Rick McDonald told The College Fix in a recent email. “(For example, Is an activity a small group conversation in a class and could you object to the activity because people in the group held different opinions than you–that sort of thing).”
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Leave a Comment