Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Arrested Over Epstein Scandal
Andrew allegedly gave Epstein confidential reports when the former prince served as a UK trade envoy between 2001 and 2011.
Police arrested Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former prince and Duke of York, for allegedly committing misconduct in public office due to links to Jeffrey Epstein.
Oh, yeah. Today is Andrew’s 66th birthday.
Andrew allegedly gave Epstein confidential reports when the former prince served as a UK trade envoy between 2001 and 2011:
The Telegraph revealed last week that the former prince appeared to have forwarded a Treasury memo in 2010 about the Icelandic economy to a banker whose firm had just bought assets from a bank there.
At the time, Britain and Iceland were engaged in a diplomatic row over British deposits lost in the 2008 banking crisis.
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor suggested the information might be useful to his friend “before you make your move”.
The Epstein files also appear to show that he forwarded official reports to the paedophile about trips to Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam and China in November 2010.
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor also appeared to have forwarded the paedophile a separate briefing on investment opportunities in Afghanistan’s Helmand province in December 2010.
The arrest took place on the Sandringham estate, where Andrew lives, after The King kicked him out of the Royal Lodge in Windsor.
“As part of the investigation, we have today arrested a man in his sixties from Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office and are carrying out searches at addresses in Berkshire and Norfolk,” stated the Thames Valley Police. “The man remains in police custody at this time.”
The London Times reported that King Charles III and Buckingham Palace did not receive advanced warning of the arrest.
His Majesty released this statement:
“I have learned with the deepest concern the news about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and suspicion of misconduct in public office.
“What now follows is the full, fair and proper process by which this issue is investigated in the appropriate manner and by the appropriate authorities. In this, as I have said before, they have our full and wholehearted support and co-operation. Let me state clearly: the law must take its course.
“As this process continues, it would not be right for me to comment further on this matter. Meanwhile, my family and I will continue in our duty and service to you all.”
The statement was signed: “Charles R.”
Andrew has been under fire for over 15 years due to his cozy relationship with Epstein.
“Following a thorough assessment, we have now opened an investigation into this allegation of misconduct in public office,” announced Thames Valley’s Assistant Chief Constable Oliver Wright. “It is important that we protect the integrity and objectivity of our investigation as we work with our partners to investigate this alleged offence.”
Wright added: “We understand the significant public interest in this case, and we will provide updates at the appropriate time.”
[Featured image via YouTube]
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
yeah
but not for anything related to violence etc towards the females of “the island”
It’s easier to prove misdeeds when there is concrete evidence and not allegations without evidence. That’s why Virginia Giuffre sued him civilly. Without video, written records or witnesses it’s really difficult to prove that type of case.
plenty of “witnesses”
all those females..oh wait
they all wanted to be there ( maybeee some exceptions) the money the gifts the travel etc
the whole epstein thing is more politics than “protecting” females
if females are to be protected than they have to be willing to have males given the same rights as they get
underachievers will not be paid the same as those who are superior to them
same exacting sentencing in courts when caught with underage students etc
men have the right to say yea or nay when the females decide to get an abortion or not ; and if not the only the female bears the fiscal responsibilities for her choices
and so on and so on
epstein ran what appears to be like the p diddler
an escort service filled with voluntary participants who sought fame and/or fortune etc
and with some females now being recognized as part of the “abusers” ( but havent really been called out as such) this should get een more interesting
think..the meetoo movement
set out to get males. but backfired to some degree with most(?) males appearing to be friends of lefty/leftys themselves
oh no we cant get trump …yet was their hidden cries/schemes
I’m sorry, I thought we fought a war specifically so we never had to care what the UK does ever again.
It’s just performative BS. They very publicly ‘arrested’ him, then they’ll quietly let him take a sweet plea deal with a slap on the wrist when they think nobody is looking.
And I don’t care either way.
It’s more about the former prince and his involvement with Epstein than it is about what the UK is doing. Had he previously left the UK to permanently reside in the United States, and subsequently been arrested for an Epstein-related matter, there would be the same level of news coverage.
Another example of why it is important and very worthwhile to get the Epstein/Maxwell files into the public. The powerful, influential, wealthy individuals who chose to ‘pal around’ with Epstein were doing so for many reasons. Some wanted access to the circle of people already in his orbit. Some wanted $/financial backing. Some wanted the ‘status’ entry into that circle seemed to confer. Others wanted to partake of the sexualized, libertine atmosphere they couldn’t get elsewhere.
Anyone who chose to ‘pal around’ with Epstein/Maxwell after his guilty plea/conviction in open court back in ’07 to ‘procurement of a minor for prostitution’ deserves to be named. Especially those who were ever listed/labeled as co conspirators. Release the FBI 302 files and everything else minus the names/images of the victims. ‘Pal around’ with Epstein isn’t a crime but it definitely demonstrates incredibly poor judgement.
If only he had married Koo Stark.
I thought it was 2 wars not to have to put up with their crap.
Nope. The second war was (mostly) about them not wanting to put up with our crap. The official reason for the war, them drafting their own citizens who were on our ships, was really stupid on their part because it gave us an excuse to declare war, but it wasn’t the real reason.
My first thought was that this conduct (sharing confidential information) was many years ago and the statute of limitations was expired.
However, I did an AI search and found that the UK does not have a SOL for these types of crimes.
Wonder if he still thinks it was worth it.
Yawn…
🥱
I’m sure that which he shared was sooper dooper pinkie swear secret and so much more criminal than bedding children on a tropical island.
And the comparisons being made between this and the government’s blind eye towards the muslim r@pe gangs that have been terrorizing young girls and livestock for a generation now.
As (bleep)ed up as the USA is right now, we look pretty good compared to GB.
Yeah . . . and yet, the grooming of very young girls — many of whom are children — by Pakistani rape gangs (see Rotherham for example) continues.
AFAIK, neither the perpetrators nor their governmental protectors (who have steadfastly ignored pleas from the victims), have been held to any account at all in spite of “inquiries.”
This grooming/rape/child abuse by “south Asians” has been going on since at least 1983, has metastasized to major cities throughout England and has been ignored totally for 20 years or more by the UK and local governments (other than a few fumbling “inquiries”).
I have pretty strong feelings about the double standard here. If His Majesty’s government can take down a royal (which sounds justifiable), how is it not a travesty that they can’t or won’t take dispositive action against the “South Asian” grooming/rape gangs and the officials who have turned a blind eye towards them for decades?
The royals are neutered
The Muslims are not
Calling SAS
Yes. The royals are being increasingly neutered, and the people on the far left have made a (temporary) alliance with the Islamists to weaken (“neuter”) the nation.
The common goal is to destroy the credibility of a defining British institution (the Royals) to further undermine any pride Brits may still have in British history.
Both the Islamists and the progressives want power, and the destruction of (once) respected institutions allows power to evaporate in the insitution and ultimately lead to a power vacuum. something which would be welcomed by both the progressives and the Islamists.
Once the traditions and (once) trusted institutions of the British are sufficiently weakened, the progressives and Islamists will cease being allies and become adversaries.
Then, it will not be pretty.
I suspect King Charles secretly converted to Islam quite a while ago.
There used to be some speculation about that, but he is too obviously fond of pork and bacon, and in many other ways doesn’t behave as even a secret Moslem would. He could have gone vegetarian, but he didn’t. And he’s gone out of his way to make apparently sincere confessions of Christian faith. He does appear to still have the religion his parents raised him in, even though he’s not nearly as intelligent as either of them. His saintly grandmother in Heaven may be keeping an eye out for him.
Because Royals don’t vote and don’t endorse candidates.
No. The less
This would never have happened under the Queen
Not that the weasel wasn’t committing crimes during her reign
I wonder if the “Royals” will ever be regarded the same
Being arrested like a commoner.
In the open olden days, he would have lost his head literally, or had a riding accident long before it would be allowed to come to this.
Also a nice distraction from the fall of the empire and Muslim rape gangs along the British who looked the other way
Being a favorite son, they would have shuffled him off to the Pitcairn Islands to live out the rest of his life in obscurity.
this will just give that megan marxist and her ex?? prince a chance to gloat how waycist the throne is
and they are
but no more so than any african kingdom is/was
Is this mor than one rich man telling another where he may invest some money and make a profit?
A bit, yes. It’s one connected man telling another one information that damaged his home country. Revealing that kind of information to people who are not cleared to receive it is illegal.
Giving someone investment advice is as you say. Giving someone information obtained by classified means is a bit different.
It gets worse. He’s not being charged for sex crimes. He’s being charged for mishandling sensitive government documents.
There is no evidence that he has ever committed a sex crime. Evidence has just now emerged that he has mishandled documents.
“Hello? Do you have Prince Andrew in the can?”
Leave a Comment