Image 01 Image 03

Trump: U.S. Will Run Venezuela to Secure Order and Transition

Trump: U.S. Will Run Venezuela to Secure Order and Transition

“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition. So we don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in.”

President Donald Trump opened his address on the aerial assault, named Operation Absolute Resolve, by praising the military, National Guard, and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth for their work on the capture.

“Early today, at my direction, the United States Armed Forces conducted an extraordinary military operation in the capital of Venezuela.

Overwhelming American military power, air, land, and sea, was used to launch a spectacular assault, and it was an assault like people have not seen since World War Two.

It was a force against a heavily fortified military fortress in the heart of Caracas to bring outlaw dictator Nicholas Maduro to justice.”

Trump expanded on the role the United States will play in what is next as the deposed Maduro heads to New York to face a slew of charges on drug trafficking and weapons.

“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition. So we don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in. And we have the same situation that we had for the last long period of years. So we are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition, and it has to be judicious, because that’s what we’re all about.

We want peace, liberty and justice for the great people of Venezuela, and that includes many from Venezuela who are now living in the United States and want to go back to their country as their homeland.

We can’t take a chance that somebody else takes over Venezuela, that doesn’t have the good of the Venezuelan people in mind for decades. We’re not going to let that happen.”

President Trump also warned those still in power that the United States would protect their interests even if that means a second strike.

“We are ready to stage a second and much larger attack if we need to do so. So we were prepared to do a second wave if we needed to do so. We actually assumed that a second wave would be necessary, but now it’s probably not the first wave, if you’d like to call it that. The first attack was so successful, we probably don’t have to do a second, but we’re prepared to do a second wave, a much bigger wave.”

He also tied the downfall of Maduro to the horrific immigration policies of the last decade.

“I’ve highlighted the stories of those innocent Americans whose lives were so heartlessly robbed by this Venezuelan terrorist organization. Really, one of the worst, one of the worst, they say, the worst Americans like 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray from Houston, beautiful Jocelyn Nungaray what happened to her?

They, as you know, they kidnapped, assaulted, and murdered by the Trende Aragua animals. They murdered Jocelyn and left her dead under the bridge. It was a bridge, a bridge that will never be the same to so many people after seeing what happened, as I’ve said many times.

The Maduro regime emptied out their prisons, sent their worst and most violent monsters into the United States to steal American lives. And they came from mental institutions and insane asylums. They came from prisons and jails. The reason I say both, they sound similar, actually, prisons little bit more, a little bit more hostile, a little bit tougher. A mental institution isn’t as tough as an insane asylum, but we got them both. They sent from their mental institutions, they sent from their jails, prisons. They were drug dealers. They were drug kingpins. They sent everybody bad into the United States, but no longer, and we have now a border where nobody gets through.”

Trump concluded his remarks with a full-throated defense of his actions.

“For decades, other administrations have neglected or even contributed to these growing security threats in the Western Hemisphere. Under the Trump administration, we are reasserting American power in a very powerful way in our home region.”

Trump opened the floor to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, who let Chairman John Daniel “Raizin” Caine describe the actions taken in Caracas during the mission.

“As the President said, the United States military conducted an apprehension mission in Caracas, Venezuela, to bring to justice two indicted persons, Nicholas and Cecilia Maduro. This operation, known as Operation Absolute Resolve, was discreet, precise, and conducted during the darkest hours of January 2, and was the culmination of months of planning and rehearsal, an operation that, frankly, only the United States military could undertake.”

Chairman Caine continued.

“This particular mission required every component of our joint force with soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and guardians, working in unison with our intelligence agency partners and law enforcement teammates in an unprecedented operation, we leveraged our unmatched intelligence capabilities and our years of experience in hunting terrorists, and we could not have done this mission without the incredible work by various intelligence agencies, including the CIA, NSA and NGA.”

Chairman Caine went into detail on the hundreds of offensive weapons, aircraft, and soldiers involved. He also mentioned that while one aircraft was hit, it remained flyable and in the air without too much damage. The mission lasted about 90 minutes and was executed without failure.

The administration’s message was unmistakable: Operation Absolute Resolve was not framed as a one-off strike, but as a decisive assertion of American power in the Western Hemisphere and a warning to hostile regimes that geographic distance no longer guarantees immunity. With Maduro in custody and facing justice in the United States, the White House cast the mission as both a national security imperative and a moral reckoning for years of instability, criminal exportation, and regional neglect.

As Washington moves to oversee a transitional period in Venezuela, the operation stands as one of the most audacious U.S. military actions in decades, combining intelligence, speed, and overwhelming force with a clear political objective. Whether it marks the beginning of a longer American presence or a rapid handoff to a new Venezuelan leadership remains to be seen. For now, the administration is betting that shock, certainty, and deterrence will succeed where diplomacy and half-measures failed.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

I have my doubts this is a good idea.

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to ghost dog. | January 3, 2026 at 12:30 pm

    This brings to mind the Tom Lehrer song about the marines.

    When someone makes a move
    Of which we don’t approve
    Who is it that always intervenes
    UN and OAS
    They have their place I guess
    But first, we send the Marines!

    Sanddog in reply to ghost dog. | January 3, 2026 at 1:08 pm

    We’ve seen what happens when we leave power vacuums. Remember Obama and Libya?

      diver64 in reply to Sanddog. | January 4, 2026 at 5:35 am

      There is no power vacuum in this case. There was an election that Maduro stole so I bet the person that actually won can step in.

    JRaeL in reply to ghost dog. | January 3, 2026 at 1:44 pm

    Oh I have no doubts whatsoever about whether it is a good idea. It is a stinko of one.

The administration’s message was unmistakable: Operation Absolute Resolve was not framed as a one-off strike, but as a decisive assertion of American power in the Western Hemisphere and a warning to hostile regimes that geographic distance no longer guarantees immunity.

And I suppose the assumption is that the evil dictators will take their balls and go home and retaliation is out of the question? And that will make flagrant violations of our and international laws worth it? Or we’ll have to kidnap all of them?

Sounds pretty fuckin’ risky

    destroycommunism in reply to SeymourButz. | January 3, 2026 at 1:08 pm

    it is always fn risky

    as risky as allowing your murderous enemies to take over without consequences

      SeymourButz in reply to destroycommunism. | January 3, 2026 at 1:24 pm

      Do you think there won’t be consequences for this? Or are consequences for other people?

        Oh, there will most certainly be consequences: some intended and some never dreamed of. The main question though is will those consequences be a positive or a negative for both the USA and the world.
        Were I a Venezuelan trying to live on a dollar a day, I know which way I’d be rooting.

    Saddam Husain approves of this message.

    Barack Obama who let ISIS take over Iraq after deposing Saddam also approves this message.

    Trump, who cleaned up Obama’s ISIS mess responds with USA! USA! USA! USA!

    MattMusson in reply to SeymourButz. | January 3, 2026 at 2:09 pm

    The Two-Hour War with Venezuela is Finally Over!

      casualt in reply to MattMusson. | January 3, 2026 at 11:14 pm

      Mission Accomplished, right? I wonder if that banner is in storage somewhere. Maybe we can use it again.

        Milhouse in reply to casualt. | January 4, 2026 at 12:22 am

        Yes, mission accomplished.

        The ship’s crew had accomplished their mission and were justly proud of it.

        No idea what happened to the banner, but it would be appropriate here too.

          casualt in reply to Milhouse. | January 4, 2026 at 12:30 am

          Funny. I love how neo-conservative aggression is back in style now that Trump is doing it.
          If Trump wanted a bill on his desk legalizing abortion everywhere, you’d find out that you deeply believe in a woman’s right to choose.
          What a bunch of sheep.

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | January 4, 2026 at 1:30 am

          Casualt, you have no idea what you’re talking about. If you really think that, then you are full of shit.

          diver64 in reply to Milhouse. | January 4, 2026 at 5:36 am

          The left, as usual, twisted the intent of the banner as a slap at Bush.

    CommoChief in reply to SeymourButz. | January 3, 2026 at 3:47 pm

    There’s no such thing as ‘international law’ unless each Nation State capable of ignoring it chooses to follow it. AKA force doctrine. Each Nation makes their own laws and those with bigger battalions often make others follow their writ. Can’t have gun boat diplomacy without gun boats and any Nation sending a cable in protest v a fleet isn’t really serious and their protest is pro forma.

    What US statutes were violated in this Operation?

      casualt in reply to CommoChief. | January 3, 2026 at 11:29 pm

      Statutes? How about the Constitution? I know we don’t really declare wars anymore, but it would be nice to have Congress involved, who has the war-making power per the Constitution.
      But I know that’s old-fashioned, conservative thinking.
      I’ll just stick to the criticism that this is a giant can of worms that would be unlikely to work out well even if we had Bismarck running the effort and [ahem] none of these guys is at the level of Robert McNamara or even Colin Powell, much less some kind of strategic genius.
      This is the stupid action of stupid, delusional men.

        Milhouse in reply to casualt. | January 4, 2026 at 12:25 am

        We do declare wars “anymore”, but nothing in the constitution requires a declared war before taking military action. It has never been the US practice to abstain from military action just because there’s been no declaration of war. The first war the USA ever fought, the “Quasi-War” against France, was never declared by either side, and that didn’t change the fact that there was legally a state of war. Declarations by both sides wouldn’t have changed that.

        Milhouse in reply to casualt. | January 4, 2026 at 12:27 am

        Nowadays its fashionable to call declarations of war “authorizations for the use of military force”, because it sounds better. But legally that is a declaration of war.

        And the existence of a state of war has never depended on declarations. The courts decide whether a state of war exists.

          casualt in reply to Milhouse. | January 4, 2026 at 11:28 am

          Sure. I agree that international law is a fiction. But all law is fiction. As always, the strong do what they will and the weak suffer as they must. That doesn’t mean that the strong doing what they will is always a good idea. In fact, the strong doing what they will is quite often very, very stupid. You may note, that the Athenians who stated this didn’t stay an empire for long.
          The Trump administration has always been about the look, not about the substance. It’s all about the imagery of power, not about actual power. And if we remain obsessed with the aesthetics of power and not with actual power, we will follow the Athenians into being subordinate to a more focused power to the east..

          casualt in reply to Milhouse. | January 4, 2026 at 12:23 pm

          Hmm. Now that I think of it, the Athenians showing up at Melos and attempting to dominate from their ships is quite close as an analog to trying to dictate Venezuelan policy from an aircraft carrier. It can maybe work in the short term, but someday you’ll slip and then the house of cards collapses. But I’m not sure it’s even going to work in the short term. If Rodriguez just says ‘no’, I suppose Trump can bomb some more or rendition her too. But eventually, he’ll have to do an actual invasion, which will be about as popular as scabies and when there are actual casualties, support will collapse entirely. And that’s not some secret. The Venezuelans can be fairly confident that Trump is a paper tiger.

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | January 4, 2026 at 4:26 pm

          So you’ve conceded that nothing in US law, including the constitution, has been violated? Now your only objection is “international law”? That makes it a matter of judgment, and it’s the president’s job to make that judgment. So far it’s working, which means he seems to have made the right call. Maybe the future will show otherwise, and maybe it won’t. But it’s his call to make.

          casualt in reply to Milhouse. | January 6, 2026 at 2:30 pm

          I didn’t say no law had been broken. I said it doesn’t matter one way or the other. I agree that it is de factor Trump’s call to make. That’s not constitutional, but nobody cares about that anymore, so yes. It’s Trump’s call to make.
          It’s just a really stupid call that was made.

          casualt in reply to Milhouse. | January 6, 2026 at 3:52 pm

          De *facto, of course,
          That said, I’m willing to admit that it might be great business for Trump and friends. I’m sure he and his buddies are making lots of money. Personally, if I were working for a US oil company charged with extracting Venezuelan oil, I’d have some concerns about security. But what do I know? I’m not going to benefit from any of this in the slightest.

    gonzotx in reply to SeymourButz. | January 3, 2026 at 5:32 pm

    Well, let’s let them continue to destroy our country from within

    That’s been working out pretty good for them, hey Seymour?

    Milhouse in reply to SeymourButz. | January 3, 2026 at 8:10 pm

    Which laws of ours do you claim were violated? Because those are the only ones that are relevant here.

Ok

Now do insurance, it’s killing American!!

    destroycommunism in reply to gonzotx. | January 3, 2026 at 12:44 pm

    cant get the dem agenda to stop

    thats what is causing the nightmares in our healthcare system

    socialism doesnt work

    it constrains innovation and causes prices to go higher as med students ,,the good ones, dont want to be constrained by the government so they move on to something else

    thats how dei is able to infiltrate…socialism >>higher prices>>worse quality

    diver64 in reply to gonzotx. | January 4, 2026 at 5:38 am

    You want Trump to order Hegseth to draw up plans to kidnap all the CEO’s of insurance companies and put them on trial? Jeez you put up some unhinged posts at times

destroycommunism | January 3, 2026 at 12:43 pm

so that our military efforts to remove mamdam,,,,I mean maduro , arent in vain

we will control the region so that china knows to stay away

would I rather this not be of course

but as they correctly noted

we must have good neighbors who arent murdering our people

fjb
maga

So basically we’re running Ukraine fiancally, including retirement packages

Are we going to
Be doing the same with Venezuela?

Do insurance if you want the common man to support you 2026

“We will replace the warmth of collectivism with a boot up its *ss.” – President Trump (apocryphal)

    Paula in reply to LB1901. | January 3, 2026 at 4:35 pm

    Mamdani said if Natanyahu visited NY he would be arrested but if Maduro visited he would welcome him with open arms. Well, Maduro’s there, but unfortunately can’t hug him back due to hand cuffs.

      henrybowman in reply to Paula. | January 3, 2026 at 4:56 pm

      Wait until Maduro walks when it’s discovered that the judge the administration selected to try him turned out to be a defrocked Scientology auditor who was never actually sworn in.

destroycommunism | January 3, 2026 at 1:06 pm

djt: and we are going to have the oil companies pay for the rebuilding of the oil infrastructure

lefty ought to be lickn his sac after that

I will simply note that the number of US opioid deaths has plummeted since robust narco-control operations have been spearheaded by our military.

This is what I voted for.

    Peter Moss in reply to Leslie Eastman. | January 3, 2026 at 1:28 pm

    I suppose that is the correct metric for judging whether this is a good idea or not, Leslie. If deaths go down and Trump is able to transition Venezuela from a narcostate to a representative government then I’m on board. My trepidation comes from the fact that Trump will eventually not be president and his successor may be as loathsome and braindead as Joe Biden or as iridescently evil as Barack Obama. We do not need another Afghanistan or Iraq or anywhere else we’ve attempted nation building and failed miserably.

      Paula in reply to Peter Moss. | January 3, 2026 at 1:46 pm

      “My trepidation comes from the fact that Trump will eventually not be president and his successor may be as loathsome and braindead as Joe Biden or as iridescently evil as Barack Obama.”

      That is true nationally. But on a smaller scale, there is one bit of good news. Mamdani will not be the mayor of NYC forever, but no one is worried that his successor could possibly be any worse.

    SeymourButz in reply to Leslie Eastman. | January 3, 2026 at 1:58 pm

    How many more heads of state should we kidnap to bring that number to zero?

    This is a serious question.

    E Howard Hunt in reply to Leslie Eastman. | January 3, 2026 at 7:04 pm

    Were Venezuelans sneaking into Americans’ bedrooms at night and injecting them with drugs?

    Maybe we should outlaw guns by the same logic -that the users have no agency.

      henrybowman in reply to E Howard Hunt. | January 4, 2026 at 1:42 am

      To some extent there was a contingent out there who was supplying their customers with drugs they didn’t choose in place of drugs that they did choose. That having been said, even if you believe that it is not the business of the US government to make choices for you as to what drugs you wish to ingest, you can make a colorable argument that something like a pure food and drug act is much more within their delegated powers.

As a distraction to get the Democrats off and running on a new “51st state!” tangent, this has possibilities. In every other way I can think of, this is a huge destabilizing move for life as we know it.

Never a dull moment. Overall, it seems to open the door to something positive for the region and for Venezuela to again become what it was and should be.

“Trump talks tough on Venezuela, but admires thugs and dictators like Nicolas Maduro. As President, I will stand with the Venezuelan people and for democracy.”
…………………Joe Biden

    Peter Moss in reply to Paula. | January 3, 2026 at 4:57 pm

    My brain said “Paula’s making stuff up. No one could be that stupid.” Then I saw “Joe Biden” and I said “Nah… Not even he could be that dumb.” Boy… I was wrong, eh?

So the Hamas/Hesbullah chapter of South America has been closed.

The Iranian people seemingly in the process of right sizing their religious dictators.

The Ukraine war is effectively over.

Boy, with all this peace about to break out it almost feels like the left needs another pandemic? 🤔

Mamdani touts the warmth of New York collectivism.

Maduro touts the warmth of New York jail cell.

The midterms will be decided by how this looks in November. This, and daycare fraud and voter fraud.

I cannot see the future, but I can see plans.

Now this is epically funny

And probably true!

https://x.com/antoniogm/status/2007398586246672723?s=20

I am having a hard time taking seriously someone who refers to himself as “See more butts.”

“We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition. So we don’t want to be involved with having somebody else get in.”

JOJO KRAKO: I thought you guys had laws! No interference!
CAPT. 
KIRK: Who’s interfering? We’re taking over!

Hoping he does this to Illinois. and soon.