Image 01 Image 03

Artemis II Moon Rocket Ready for Move to Launch Pad

Artemis II Moon Rocket Ready for Move to Launch Pad

A “wet” dress rehearsal is slated for Feb. 2, and the launch with the crew members aboard may happen as early as Feb. 6th.

More than half a century after Apollo 17’s boots left the last human prints in lunar dust in December 1972, the Artemis program is poised to revive an era when deep space was a destination, not a dream.

This new program aims squarely beyond Earth’s orbit, treating the Moon not as a finish line but as the opening waypoint for a sustained human presence in deep space. With Artemis II set to send astronauts back into the lunar neighborhood in early February, the U.S. is rekindling the robust, outward‑looking spirit of exploration and signals that the long pause since the last Moon landing is finally over.

Artemis II is NASA’s first crewed test flight of the Space Launch System rocket and Orion spacecraft, a roughly 10‑day mission that will send four astronauts on a lunar flyby to validate life‑support, navigation, and other systems before future Moon landings. It is the first journey by humans to the vicinity of the Moon since the Apollo 17 mission.

The Space Launch System (SLS) rocket will soon be heading to the launch pad.

Inside the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the agency’s Artemis II Moon rocket stands poised for the next step in its journey. Engineers are targeting no earlier than 7 a.m. EST, Saturday, Jan. 17, to begin rolling NASA’s powerful SLS (Space Launch System) rocket and Orion spacecraft, atop the mobile launcher, to the spaceport’s Launch Pad 39B.

NASA’s crawler-transporter 2 will carry the 11-million-pound stack at about one mile per hour along the four-mile route to Launch Pad 39B. The journey will take up to 12 hours. The time of rollout is subject to change if additional time is needed for technical preparations or weather.

A “wet” dress rehearsal is slated for Feb. 2, and the launch with the crew members aboard may happen as early as Feb. 6th.

A critical milestone is a “wet dress rehearsal,” during which flight teams will load more than 700,000 gallons of cryogenic propellant and practice the countdown sequence—pushing the spacecraft to its limits without astronauts onboard. During similar preparations for Artemis II’s uncrewed predecessor, Artemis I, persistent problems with hydrogen leaks ultimately delayed that mission’s launch for months. This time NASA is hoping the process will be much smoother. The earliest date in the mission’s launch window is February 6.

If all goes according to plan, Artemis II will lift off on its historic journey carrying four astronauts—NASA’s Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Jeremy Hansen—on a 10-day flight around the moon and back: the Orion spacecraft will follow a free-return trajectory that uses the moon’s gravity to loop the crew around and back toward Earth. Reaching about 4,700 miles beyond the lunar farside, the crew will go the farthest from Earth any humans have ever voyaged, ensuring not only rigorous system checks but also breathtaking views of our home planet—and, of course, the moon.

During the mission, the crew will wear sensors to monitor their health and physiological responses to the deep-space environment beyond the moon. And among the myriad experiments packed into Artemis II’s science payloads will be AVATAR (A Virtual Astronaut Tissue Analog Response), a system designed to mimic individual astronaut organs. Artemis II will be the first time AVATAR has been tested so far from Earth.

Here’s hoping for a smooth rollout, a crisp wet dress rehearsal, and a spectacular launch that carries Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen safely around the Moon and home again, in an event that sets the successful trajectory for lunar landings and missions. and new discoveries that will follow in their wake.

Though Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. may have to have a chat with the new NASA director about his motivational techniques for the ground crew.

Good luck and Godspeed!

Note: NASA will stream the SLS/Orion Artemis II rollout live on its main NASA TV/streaming outlets, with the primary public feed running on the NASA YouTube channel starting at 7 a.m. EST on rollout day.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Artemis II moon rocket is ready for launch

“baby steps”—term used by mission planners to describe the small, incremental steps required before humans can return to the lunar surface.

“Baby steps to the door. Baby steps to the elevator. Baby steps into the elevator. I’m in the elevator!”


 
 0 
 
 3
ztakddot | January 18, 2026 at 8:45 pm

This seems pretty ambitious for a space system that hasn’t yet achieved orbital flight.


     
     3 
     
     1
    henrybowman in reply to ztakddot. | January 18, 2026 at 10:42 pm

    “an era when deep space was a destination”
    Is the moon really “deep space?” Survey: use the thumbs to vote.

    Gully Foyle is my name /
    Terra is my station /
    Deep space is my dwelling place /
    And death’s my destination…


       
       0 
       
       1
      Truejim in reply to henrybowman. | January 19, 2026 at 9:47 am

      That was the original version of The Ballad of Gully Foyle”, which he devised when he was still stranded in space, and dying, due to the treachery of the Vorga spacecraft operators. (“I kill thee filthy, Vorga!”) By quoting that early version, you are apparently presenting as a pessimist.

      Much better known, of course, is that when Gully prevailed and opened the stars to human exploration, by “space jaunting”, he replaced the last line, re his death, with the line that became the title of Alfred Bester’s truly great novel: “The Stars My Destination”.


       
       0 
       
       1
      Truejim in reply to henrybowman. | January 19, 2026 at 9:50 am

      By the way, in both versions of the Ballad of Gully Foyle, the second line actually reads: “Terra is my Nation”. Not “station” as you have it.


         
         0 
         
         0
        henrybowman in reply to Truejim. | January 19, 2026 at 2:29 pm

        Not so bad from memory, of a book I read 58 years ago.
        I thought the original version was more suited to a discussion about deep space.
        Once you can jaunt into space, deep becomes pretty meaningless.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Dean Robinson in reply to henrybowman. | January 20, 2026 at 4:03 am

      One off my all time favorites! Thanks for the reminder, the launch is a fitting occasion for a reread, since my first encounter with this classic took place right around Apollo 11.


     
     0 
     
     3
    alaskabob in reply to ztakddot. | January 19, 2026 at 12:50 am

    I have reservations…. I am very uneasy with this launch.


       
       0 
       
       0
      WestRock in reply to alaskabob. | January 19, 2026 at 10:38 am

      Me too. I always worry about the safety of the crews. There have only been a few misfortunes, going back to Grissom, White, and Chaffee 59 years ago next week. The crews know they are strapped to a massive potential bomb, and there are other potential points of failure as well. Millions of them, I’d imagine. Some hope, prayers, and positive thoughts are always in order. 🤞


 
 0 
 
 2
OwenKellogg-Engineer | January 18, 2026 at 8:48 pm

THIS is what makes America great again. Its been a long time coming.


     
     0 
     
     0
    alaskabob in reply to OwenKellogg-Engineer. | January 19, 2026 at 1:03 am

    The Apollo F-1 engines were essentially hand built. The present technology is so much better. Over at Dave’s Garage on YouTube, when comparing computer speeds over the years, the fastest desktop PCs are 60 million times faster than the Apollo Guidance Computer that got us to the Moon in 1968.


 
 0 
 
 0
Suburban Farm Guy | January 18, 2026 at 10:34 pm

This one fake as the last one?

/s


 
 0 
 
 0
PrincetonAl | January 18, 2026 at 10:41 pm

Space rocket efficiency is about cost to launch per kg to LEO (or other orbital point)

Cost per KG to LEO:
SLS: $43,000+, may drop to $10,000
Falcon Heavy: $1500
Starship target: $200-$900

Isaacman will kill SLS at some point and rightly so. Musk will outperform it by somewhere between 10x and 100x …


     
     0 
     
     0
    ChrisPeters in reply to ChrisPeters. | January 19, 2026 at 11:38 am

    By the way,

    behindtheblack.com

    is a great website for space exploration and space launch news, as well as some occasional political commentary from a conservative viewpoint.

    A daily visit for me!


       
       0 
       
       0
      henrybowman in reply to ChrisPeters. | January 19, 2026 at 2:49 pm

      Any government functionary that has the brass to respond to an FOIA request with a document where every single word has been redacted should be frog-marched out to the Mall and publicly shot in the head.


 
 0 
 
 1
mailman | January 19, 2026 at 7:19 am

Not being funny here but hopefully the “to validate life‑support” bit has already been signed off, validated and confirmed as working BEFORE going to space! 🙂


 
 0 
 
 0
E Howard Hunt | January 19, 2026 at 9:02 am

The crew is as diverse and woke as they could get away with. Two astronauts and two tokens.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.