Image 01 Image 03

Cornell’s DEI Zombie Survived Trump Deal

Cornell’s DEI Zombie Survived Trump Deal

My Op-Ed in The NY Post: “In a netherworld of word games and obfuscation, Cornell’s DEI lives on — and it will come roaring back if higher education waits Trump 2.0 out. Only ongoing federal enforcement and monitoring will short-circuit a future DEI zombie apocalypse.”

On November 7, 2025, a deal between Cornell University and the Trump administration was announced. You can read the Agreement here.

There has been a lot of hype about the deal, focused mainly on Cornell’s total payments of $60 million. There have been suggestions that the deal ends DEI at Cornell, or imposes strict standards of conduct on the campus. Not so.

I addressed all these issues in an Op-Ed at The NY Post, Trump’s Cornell University deal leaves a ‘zombie’ DEI agenda ready to rise from the dead.

As happens at all major online publications, most of the external hyperlinks are stripped out by the webmasters, so that readers do not leave the site. I’ve reproduced the op-ed below with my original hyperlinks added back in – I think it’s important to show the sources for what I write (like we do here at the blog), particularly the video statement of the Cornell President which I found dismissive and almost mocking towards a key point in the Agreement – the requirement that DOJ Guidance be used as part of faculty and staff training.

Here is the Op-ed.

Cornell University’s deal with President Donald Trump, announced Friday, ended the administration’s civil rights investigations into the school — and left Cornell’s destructive Diversity, Equity and Inclusion agenda diminished, but not destroyed.

What remains of Cornell’s DEI apparatus now resembles a zombie: It exists but is not quite alive.

And it could yet resurrect itself.

Each side benefits from the deal: Cornell, where I have taught law for 18 years, will get hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of federal grants that were put on hold as the government probed the campus response to the Oct. 7 massacre in Israel and the harassment of Jewish students.

Cornell will pay a $30 million penalty and invest another $30 million in agricultural

The federal investigation was well founded.

One now-former student is serving prison time for threatening Jews on campus; a Cornell professor set off an Internet firestorm when he said he felt “exhilarated” by the Hamas rampage; anti-Israel activists called for an Intifada, set up encampments, and disrupted university events.

Many Jewish students — including some who testified before Congress — felt under siege.

Cornell now gets to crow that it upheld “principles of academic freedom, independence, and institutional autonomy.”

Indeed: That unfettered independence created a faculty monoculture of leftism that brewed those toxic campus incidents, and it remains unchanged.

Here on campus, of course, we’re hearing howls of anger that the school has bent the knee to the Orange Man.

But Cornell’s president and trustees had a duty to protect the university that faculty, students and internet trolls don’t have, and for administrators this is Mission Accomplished.

The White House also touted the deal as a win, saying it ensures Cornell “upholds merit-based standards, complies with Federal law, and fosters an environment of academic excellence and safety for all students.”

It’s important to the wider project of higher-education reform, putting pressure on other elite academic institutions to fall in line.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the deal a “transformative commitment from an Ivy League institution to end divisive DEI policies.”

Nonetheless, it leaves Cornell’s DEI programs and initiatives in place.

I have long advocated that Cornell’s DEI programs “must be removed wholesale, weeded out root and branch” — because they have poisoned the entire university by “centering race and group identity.”

The deal does not rip out DEI by the roots, as much as I hoped it would.

I shouldn’t be surprised: A university that mandates an absurd virtue-signaling “land acknowledgement” at the start of every official event will likely go to any lengths to retain its DEI religion.

And Cornell has already shown us that it sees DEI reform as a mere word game — it has rebranded its DEI offices with the term “inclusion and belonging,” and has changed its former Office of Academic Diversity Initiatives into the Office of Academic Discovery and Impact.

The deal does jeopardize DEI at Cornell in important ways, however.

The agreement forces Cornell to train its faculty and staffers with a July document from the Justice Department, “Guidance for Recipients of Federal Funding Regarding Unlawful Discrimination.”

That’s hugely important: It means the university has acknowledged the government’s expectations for the most ideologically pernicious group on campus — the faculty.

No faculty member can now claim he or she was unaware of the Justice Department’s guidelines on civil rights.

But Cornell cannot be trusted.

Already its president is mocking claims the deal changed anything, assuring the community that the federal guidance is not binding — comments that arguably violate the agreement to use the guidelines going forward.

Yet even as Cornell laughs in Trump’s face, his executive orders on ending DEI in the federal government and in the private sector, along with federal law, give his Justice Department and other agencies ample power to enforce both the letter and the spirit of the deal.k Friday to do your holiday s

The Equal Protection Project, which I founded, can and will notify the Attorney General and other officials of DEI activities we consider to violate the law, but we will need federal authorities to act promptly and forcefully.

Make no mistake: In a netherworld of word games and obfuscation, Cornell’s DEI lives on — and it will come roaring back if higher education waits Trump 2.0 out.

Only ongoing federal enforcement and monitoring will short-circuit a future DEI zombie apocalypse.

UPDATE 11-12-2025 – Here’s what it looked like in this morning’s print edition:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

I looked at Cornell’s Land Acknowledgement to the Cayuga people. You are right in stating it is “an absurd virtue-signaling at the start of every official event”.

The Cayuga people experienced a significant population decline as a direct result of the Columbian Exchange via Old World diseases before the subsequent European colonization.

Cornell’s president and trustees would be two face, forked-tongue old white people if they resurrect DEI~

The land acknowledgement statement strikes me as really a prayer for forgiveness of Cornell University by the ancient stone age peoples. Given that Cornell University is an educational institution structured to impart knowledge and wisdom, would it not be most appropriate if the prayer (i.e. land acknowledgement statement) also included a petition to the departed stone age peoples for the granting of wisdom to the students and professors of Cornell? Just saying.

The reverse-racism zombies are part-vampire, hiding from daylight while waiting for night under Democrat rule to return, so they can resume sucking the blood out of Western Civilization.

I work in a company that went heavy on woke. Failed wildly.

New CEO, new CIO, and many new VPs. The new ones didn’t have the courage to say they were stepping away from it. They just quietly dismantled the overtness. The underlings… ie lower VP and Directors and Sr Managers who were all in on this and all of the woke-tards they hired are still there.

Who do you think those mid and low level leaders are going bump up?

Do like the proggies like to do… force consent decrees on them. Then set up an apparatus to monitor those decrees that is staffed by staunch conservatives and structure it in such a way that future administrations cannot dismantle it.

Or, just eliminate the Dept of Education.

destroycommunism | November 12, 2025 at 10:17 am

its even worse when your side wants you to buy into their bs:

Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the deal a “transformative commitment from an Ivy League institution to end divisive DEI policies.”

Trump apparently thinks that any “deal” – even a bad deal – is better than no deal at all. Well I disagree – and this is a bad deal – and I am a Cornell alum.

WAJ is right – DEI is a phoenix that will rise again. I thought original discussions included some limit on the % of foreign student enrollment – that is not here. I am sure that Ezra Cornell’s “I would found an institution where any student ….” does not refer to a large contingent of Chinese students from mainland China.