Image 01 Image 03

Kamala’s Profanity-Laced — and Incredibly Ironic — Reaction to Trump’s Ballroom

Kamala’s Profanity-Laced — and Incredibly Ironic — Reaction to Trump’s Ballroom

“Are you f*cking kidding me? … I’m not going to be distracted by, ‘Oh, does the guy have a big f*cking hammer?’ What about those babies?”

Former Vice President Kamala Harris appeared Thursday as a guest on comedian Jon Stewart’s eponymous podcast. During an interview that covered a wide range of topics, Stewart asked for her thoughts on President Donald Trump’s construction of a ballroom at the White House. The explosive, profanity-laced response that followed — quickly going viral on social media — was nothing short of extraordinary.

In the clip below, Harris told Stewart:

Are you f*cking kidding me? This guy wants to create a ballroom for his rich friends while completely turning a blind eye to the fact that babies are going to starve when the SNAP benefits end in just hours from now! Come on!

I’m not going to be distracted by, ‘Oh, does the guy have a big f*cking hammer?’ What about those babies?

To begin with, as many have noted in the public debate over the ballroom, the White House genuinely needs a proper entertainment venue — something it has long lacked. Undoubtedly, future presidents of both parties will appreciate this valuable addition.

Moreover, the project comes at no cost to taxpayers; it is being funded entirely by Trump and private donors.

Yet the most striking aspect of Harris’s meltdown was the strange and irrelevant connection she drew between the ballroom and babies going hungry. The two issues, of course, are entirely unrelated. Even more ironic — and perhaps most hypocritical of all—was that this fierce defender of extreme abortion rights suddenly professed concern for the well-being of babies. As if access to abortion in the U.S. weren’t already extensive, she ran on a platform of expanding it even more.

And Harris was so concerned about children’s welfare during her service as border czar that the Biden-Harris administration lost track of approximately 300,000 immigrant children. Although the Trump administration has located a fraction of those missing children, they have a long way to go.

Furthermore, if she’s truly worried about Americans losing access to SNAP and Women’s, Infants, and Children’s Nutrition Program benefits, she should use her influence to pressure her Democratic colleagues to end the shutdown. Since her party is effectively holding these programs hostage to its unreasonable demands, doing so would help ensure that “those babies” remain healthy.

Here are a few reactions to Harris’s rant on social media.

For the few readers who actually have an interest, the full interview can be viewed on YouTube.


Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on X or LinkedIn.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

By putting on her angry black woman costume she managed to stifle her word salad cognitive impairments through base limbic indulgence.

And this dumbo still thinks she should be POTUS

PSA to the lawyers out there. Despite Kammie’s purported experience as a prosecutor (whatever that might be), don’t try this one in court: “Are you f*cking kidding me?” The judge does have a big hammer.

I have to wonder if there’s some kind of disease process going on here because there’s no way – no way – that this woman could possibly have gotten through law school, never mind passing the bar (the exam, not the cocktail lounge) with her present state of mind.

There are many words that could be used to describe this little diatribe but I’ll use the most obvious and accurate: stupid.

I have the perfect solution for SNAP and starving children for the democrats. They should propose that abortion be extended to cover all children on SNAP regardless of their age. Problems solved. There will be no starving children and the democrats can throw some red meat at their AWFL base starving for all abortion all the time.

    Spike3 in reply to ztakddot. | November 1, 2025 at 4:10 am

    Kamala: “Babies shouldn’t be starving! We could just suck them out with a vacuum before it becomes an issue!”

Can anyone find a quote of Trump dropping the F bomb?

Trump…you know… the guy whose tweets were too mean for him to be President?

The Gentle Grizzly | October 31, 2025 at 4:32 pm

“A vulgar mouth is a weak mind expressing itself. “ – Earl S. Ricker, my late stepfather

Actually, it is wrong to say the project will not cost USA government anything.

Most, if not all, of the ballroom contributors will deduct the contribution on their income tax return.

To the extent the contributors receive a tax benefit, that will be the US government’s cost for the project.

    George S in reply to ParkRidgeIL. | October 31, 2025 at 5:53 pm

    A public project will cost a dollar.

    The federal government prepares to spend that dollar.

    Contributors step in and put up the dollar instead.

    Contributors deduct that dollar from their taxes.

    The government saved one dollar in expense and lost one dollar in revenue.

    The government lost (or gained) zero.

      henrybowman in reply to George S. | October 31, 2025 at 6:04 pm

      One correction: contributors deduct that dollar not from their taxes, but from their income. Meaning the taxman doesn’t lose that whole dollar, just some percentage of it. Government makes out.

    henrybowman in reply to ParkRidgeIL. | October 31, 2025 at 6:03 pm

    Unless Trump created a 501(c)(3) to build the ballroom, I don’t know of any classification where such a donation would be deductible

    Milhouse in reply to ParkRidgeIL. | November 1, 2025 at 12:22 pm

    No, the government will not lose anything. The taxes they would have paid on that money, had they not given it away, do not belong to the government, and never did belong to it. The government has no right to that money. It taxes income that people earn and do not give away; if they give it away then they don’t get the benefit of it, so why should they pay taxes on it?

    And since they’re giving it to the government, the government actually gains the whole amount, rather than merely the taxes it would have collected had they kept it for themselves instead.

Probably drunk when she spewed her vile. I’ll “maybe” pay attention when she comes out against abortion.
Her bs of children will starve has no meaning coming from her hate filled mouth until she quits supporting abortion.

2smartforlibs | October 31, 2025 at 6:40 pm

Stop applying for village idiot. That ballroom is 150 years past due.

A Federal Judge has ordered the Easter Bunny to return to the white house to guide the president where she wants him to go without having to issue so many restraining orders.

Crone-harlot-dunce-diva, Kamuluh, demonstrates her manifest unfitness to hold any political office, every time she opens her wine-addled, greasy and dirty potty mouth.

If this miserable harridan think that she can curse her way into the White House, in an utterly lame and misguided attempt to appear “cool,” she is gravely mistaken.

you can take the rat out of the hood……,,

Suburban Farm Guy | October 31, 2025 at 11:44 pm

Jon Stewart is a comedian? News to me. A veritable laff riot of social justice authoritarian Trump deranged fantasies. Har de effen har.

Since when is reciting leftist hivemind goosestepping groupthink slogans called comedy?

    Left to his own devices, Stewart is talented and very funny. But, when constrained by the limits of TDS-compliant rants that he is PAID to deliver, literally no one can be funny. What Stewart has done is sacrifice his soul to whatever. He sold his integrity, and like others, will discover that it isn’t something that you can simply buy back. By trying to stay relevant, he has lost his lasting legacy forever. Ditto Kimmel and Colbert. Once a shill, forever a shill.

surfcitylawyer | October 31, 2025 at 11:58 pm

Standard far left rant. “Themoney could have been used to help children and the poor.”
It is being used to pay the workers who are building the event space. It will pay for food the workers and their children will eat, the clothes they wear, and other worthwhile things. The workers in the stores that sell the workers food and clothing will use the money they get to buy food and clothing.

Gutter trash, once DEI VP trash to an Autopen. Now gutter trash peddling a trash book.