The Left Wastes No Time Expressing Vile, Cruel Reactions After Charlie Kirk Shooting
“But following up with what was just said, he’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups.”
Mere minutes after Charlie Kirk was shot, MSNBC and the left went on tirades against Kirk.
Scott Jennings is correct: “I’m not sure it’s safe to be an outspoken conservative walking around in America right now.”
The Democrats
Anyone shocked?
Speaker Johnson paused votes for a moment of silence for Charlie Kirk. When Rep Boebert asked for someone to lead a prayer aloud, Democrats objected, citing the House’s silence after other shootings. Rep Luna then started shouting across the aisle.
pic.twitter.com/OmOFzUNTAp— Grace Chong, MBI (@gc22gc) September 10, 2025
Matthew Dowd
Shame on Matthew Dowd. It’s Kirk’s fault someone shot him:
MSNBC host: Talk to me about the environment in which a shooting like this happens?
DOWD: Yeah, again, I emphasize what you just emphasize. We don’t know any details of this, that we don’t know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration or so. We have no idea about this. But following up with what was just said, he’s been one of the most divisive, especially divisive younger figures in this who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups.
And I always go back to hateful thoughts, lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that’s the environment we’re in that people just you can’t stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have, and then saying these awkward words and not expect awful actions to take place. And that’s the unfortunate environment we’re in.
The despicable ghouls at MSNBC immediately attack Charlie Kirk in wake of shooting — Matthew Dowd blames Kirk's pushing “hate speech” as reason he was shot:
"I always go back to hateful thoughts, lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions."
“You can't stop with… pic.twitter.com/Js2uESSZdQ
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 10, 2025
JB Pritzker
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker blamed President Donald Trump and January 6th because of course:
My sympathy to Charlie Kirk’s family and to Charlie Kirk, who obviously, is, you know, become a target for somebody.
I don’t know whether it’s political violence, because I don’t know who did it. I know they seem to have somebody in custody, but I will say that political violence, unfortunately, has been ratcheting up in this country. We saw the shootings, the killings in Minnesota. We’ve seen other political violence occur in other states, and I would just say it’s got to stop.
And I think that think there are people who are fomenting it in this country. I think the President’s rhetoric often foments it. We’ve seen the January 6 rioters who clearly, you know, have tripped a new era of political violence.
JB Pritzker, who earlier compared the US to Nazi Germany for arresting criminals, is now blaming Charlie Kirk’s shooting on January 6th and President Trump.
Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/nH0PSxe6Bb
— AF Post (@AFpost) September 10, 2025
Katy Tur
Tur is scared for DEMOCRATS:
Steve, people are really upset, and they start lashing out online, and they start blaming others for what led up to this. I mean, we see it when Democrats are targeted. We see it when Republicans are targeted, and we’re seeing it with this. Anna Paulina Luna, who is a representative from Florida, has put this out on X she’s blaming the Democrats. She’s blaming the rhetoric the Democrats use it, use calling Republicans fascist. She’s saying you are the hate.
If you’re in the FBI field office and you see this sort of stuff bubbling up online, how worried do you get about somebody taking up the cause of Charlie Kirk and lashing out on on somebody who’s seen as a Democrat, or somebody who is a Democrat?
MSNBC has no shame.@KatyTurNBC ought to be fired: "How worried do you get about somebody taking up the cause of Charlie Kirk?" pic.twitter.com/BdAmHyvtYX
— ForAmerica (@ForAmerica) September 10, 2025
Laura Coates
BUT TRUMP:
This is at a time, of course, as you all know, David, especially about the motive from the President of United States to ensure that crime is at an all time low in the presence of reinforcing military officials at times to make sure that’s the case.
Will there be an expanded move now in that aspect of it? And if that’s the case, will college campuses, which is traditionally been a bit of a island unto itself in terms of the ability of local law enforcement to come on. Will it be treated differently?
The investigation begins simultaneously when the family begins to process what it would be like to explain to these young children that daddy is hurt, and will he be coming home tonight or ever?
CNN’s Laura Coates wonders if President Trump will use the shooting of Charlie Kirk to expand his crackdown on crime in cities: “This is at a time, of course, as you all know, David, especially about the motive from the President of United States to ensure that crime is at an all… pic.twitter.com/KMl6qPEaZx
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 10, 2025
Oh, she said more and it’s just as terrible:
Here, if this, in fact, is tied to his ideology, given the fact that he is quite the lightning rod in many communities and has been accessible, and yet controversial, you’ve got a very terrifying prospect for so many people who share his similar qualities in the sense of a public figure who is unabashed about their views, that alienates others. That could possibly be a target for somebody.
It is horrific to think about this being a young father, a human being, generally being targeted in this way. But now the law enforcement community has to go into full effect, including prosecutors…Was there a particular verbal trigger that there was coordinated in some way that law enforcement could have been made aware of?
Is there a clear and present and prospective danger, or are we dealing with somebody who wants to use this platform, having targeted this person to gain notoriety for a larger ideological end, and that would be under the umbrella of domestic terrorism?
CNN’s Laura Coates on Charlie Kirk being shot: “Here, if this, in fact, is tied to his ideology, given the fact that he is quite the lightning rod in many communities and has been accessible, and yet controversial, you've got a very terrifying prospect for so many people who… pic.twitter.com/aoAe23a2Z1
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 10, 2025
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
They have no shame because they do not believe in morality.
Worse they believe they define morality. Why would they feel shame everything they do is good.
This. They very intensely believe in morality, and they have convinced themselves that we’re on the wrong side of it.
Demonrats and their lsm enablers see everything through a political lens. It’s all they know because it’s what they learned in college. Charlie Kirk was flipping that script and that caused one of them to commit murder for political effect.
I don’t think “political violence” is the proper term, when the violence always comes from the same side side.
Matthew Dodd should lose his job tonight! There is no room on a public network to say Kirk deserved to die.
Dodd should stay right where he is, we need to be kept aware of the danger that the Left represents
no one is more divisive than the push for socialism which is the economic link to communism
People not only need to be fired but they need to be exiled from ever showing their face in public again. These people are showing us they don’t deserve being called humans. They are demons.
so whats the difference between what the left is doing with their violence in america
to what the blmplo does in israel?
Effectiveness.
If most Democrats believed in what the fake news media spouts out this would be a daily occurrence.
Unfortunately the fake news media complex is effective enough that this does happen.
so leftists continue to murder americans or anyone else they care to
and the government is backing them up with these
“cant put the in prison” b/c
and we/the gop buys into this!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Matthew Dowd is a deranged c*nt who should have the teeth broken out of his mouth.
that would be Dodd’s pronouncements being applied to Dodd
#Democrats have had a great month. Trans kid shoots up a Catholic school, a career criminal murders a woman that fled violence in her own country, a gang smashes and attacks an elderly jewelry store owner, now Charlie Kirk is assassinated while engaging in his 1st Amendment rights. The public policy of Democrats is a threat to us all. At some point enough will be enough. Trump was right. They want to get us too. Who is next? More school kids, church goers, anyone who dares to disagree with them. Democrats are a threat to everyone. I can’t say that enough.
Today, still more evil.
The vile Ds have sown the seeds of violence for years, and now they shall reap the whirlwind.
For Charlie……remember that
This going to have chilling effect on free speech. Colleges will be canceling speakers saying they don’t have resources for security. This what leftists wanted.
IMO this was political violence fueled by frankly insane, violent rhetoric without any purpose but to feed the delusional appetite for ‘justified violence’ that plainly exists on the left. Some on the left seem very susceptible to the endless calls to ‘go to war’, Resist, fight in the streets, ‘get in their face’. We saw it with the loons gathering at the home of Justice Kavanaugh, with the assassination attempts on Trump, the attempted murder of Steve Scalise, with the murder of Brian Thompson (United Health), with the Tranny whackos killing children in Churches and schools. All of these are the result of d/prog ‘hype men’ jacking up their lunatic lefty members with dangerously violent rhetoric. Time to tone it down.
My office (a in a public health agency) has had a running conversation in MS Teams bashing RFK Jr. So after allowing the echoes to fade, I threw in a comment with a raft of statistics on the growing prevalence of certain diseases/afflictions in children (e.g., obesity, autism, diabetes, etc.), and said “RFK Jr. can’t break HHS, because it’s already broken and has been broken for decades.” This was promptly answered by the office director cautioning to not say anything untoward. My comment was then replied to by a co-worker who stated that HHS cuts were made “for no other reason but cruelty.”
My office director? Crickets.
I’m giving him a full 24 hours to remark on the inappropriateness of this comment. If I don’t see anything from him tomorrow morning, I’m going to let him know that I’m disappointed that he allowed a comment like that to go unremarked, and the likelihood that language like this got Charlie Kirk killed.
What a silly juvenile comment she made with no regard to data.
Liberals’ language (fascist, Hitler, totalitarian) doesn’t inspire their fellows to violence.
But the language of the Right inspires the Left to violence.
Got it.
I have seen this all over Facebook. Truly disgusting.
I’m glad to know the name of the evil POS that said that. I heard it on a video with no picture of who was saying it.
I hope that he never works again.
These people do not care about people because they do not believe in GOD. These people have hatred for Charlie Kirk as Charlie did nothing to cause his death. It is people like this that spout out hateful words that lead to the Left to do things like this.
Well, he’s not wrong. There has been all this hateful speech by Democrats, highlighted by Biden’s infamous “red” speech, and you can’t not expect awful actions to take place.
It’s not incitement, it’s not anything the law can deal with, but it’s real and we’ve all been seeing it for decades really, but especially the last decade.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk was designed to send MAGA and the entire world a message. If they can kill Kirk, they can kill anyone. That’s the message.
They want to terrify conservatives and stop conservative political discourse.
I’ll put it this way so that it passes muster in the combat section: I really hope the reaction that they do get is different from the one you suspect they want.
You can’t hate the left enough
Yes we can. But we won’t resort to their level of violence in that hate.
You, and other people, seem to forget that their understanding of violence is not necessarily physical.
That’s a bs smokescreen to justify actual violence.
How many people would decry someone’s words as violence while running straight towards it with blue hair flying wildly behind them and stick their wide eyed face right in the punching zone?
The answer is no one. It defies basic human instincts. They KNOW words are not violence but want to use that as a pretext to commit actual violence. This is just the end result of such sociopathic rhetoric.
Whatever the means … if we don’t fight we will loose.
Nothing will happen. You can’t vote your way out of this and it can’t be fixed under the constitution.
A good place to start the ‘fix’ is reforms in the way we approach libel and slander, returning to a more traditional interpretation of liability. If John Q Public wants to declare that someone is a ‘nazi’ or full of ‘ists and isms’ they need to be prepared to present evidence to support their claim or get sued into oblivion. Explicitly make the damages for slander and libel non dischargable debts and grant those debts the highest priority claim in any bankruptcy. No whining about inability to pay, send them to a Nevada whore house to work off the debt at $20 a throw if they claim they can’t pay.
WWGMD?
What would Golda Meir do?
Communists waste no time in proving they have no place at a civilized society.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk (and several other recent attacks), and the Left’s reaction to it, has ended any possibility of a reconciliation between Left and Right. We are now engaged in an active civil war. Prepare yourselves accordingly.
The quotes from Laura Coates are rambling and don’t make any sense, but I don’t get the impression that she was trying to say something wrong. I think she was actually trying to say the right thing, but the language center in her brain must have been scrambled and it came out as word salad.
I agree. I think she was trying to say something sensitive to the situation without offending her audience. The mental gears started grinding at the attempt.
F*CK them all.
Pandering to her audience doesn’t make her any better.
Yeah I agree. She seemed to be trying to have a discussion about ‘what to do’ /’what impact’ would follow in the wake of this assassination and whether the Trump WH and Congress would seek a domestic terrorism statute to prosecute this sort of political violence. The problem with the 24/7 news coverage is content for the airtime and her the topics she introduced were about 48 hours early and come across a bit ghoulish.
Randy Wayne White wrote this line in one of his novels and holds true on a day like today
“In any conflict the boundaries of behavior are defined by the party that cares the least about morality”
― Randy Wayne White, The Mangrove Coast
Variety is reporting Dowd has been fired for his comments.
https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/matthew-dowd-fired-msnbc-charlie-kirk-death-1236514875/
Today every MSM commentator stated Charlie Kirk deserved to die, obliquely. Likewise most Democratic members of the House. Two Democratic governors.
None condemning the killer. Not a one. Like the death of the white train passenger by the black brainwashed to hate whites, all approve.
Every single Democrat of stature approves of targeted crime.
Larry Correia had the best take on this. (See Instapundit) The hardcore leftists (see Doud) reactively show us exactly who they are when things like this happen. Then the softcore lefts have to first virtue signal to their peeps, sliming Kirk to show their ‘virtue’ before muttering something about murder being bad and slinking back to their caves.
We are at war. Refusing to recognize it makes it no less true.
The left vilifies us and calls for violence against our leaders, then feign surprise when violence is meted out against our leaders.
We are under attack. The Gauntlet has been thrown. We can take it up, or we can cower. Those are the choices.