Image 01 Image 03

Noem: CBS ‘Shamefully’ Edited Interview to Hide MS-13 Ties

Noem: CBS ‘Shamefully’ Edited Interview to Hide MS-13 Ties

It’s yet another example of legacy media tilting coverage to fit its narrative: soften the story, protect the left’s agenda, and downplay the violent crimes tied to illegal immigration.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is accusing CBS of flat-out media bias after Face the Nation cut more than 25 seconds out of her answer about an illegal immigrant facing human smuggling charges, erasing every reference she made to gang activity, abuse, and exploitation of minors.

On Sunday, CBS aired just eight seconds of Noem’s remarks about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national accused of human smuggling who has been linked to MS-13. The network’s broadcast stopped right after she said he “shouldn’t walk free in the United States of America,” conveniently leaving out the allegations that show just how dangerous he is.

Here’s what CBS didn’t want viewers to hear: a full 33-second answer, buried in the transcript but chopped off on TV:

“Although this individual does have criminal charges pending. He has charges pending against him civilly as well, and the one thing that we will continue to do is to make sure that he doesn’t walk free in the United States of America. This individual was a known human smuggler, MS-13 gang member, an individual who was a wife beater and someone who was so perverted that he solicited nude photos from minors and even his fellow human traffickers told him to knock it off. He was so sick in what he was doing and how he was treating small children, so he needs to never be in the United States of America, and our administration is making sure we’re doing all that we can to bring him to justice.”

Instead of letting viewers see that context, CBS pivoted to a new question and added a defensive editor’s note in the written transcript:

“Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been charged with two counts of human smuggling and has pleaded not guilty. He is currently in ICE detention pending trial. He has not been charged with any counts related to child abuse.”

Noem blasted the network for “shamefully” editing her remarks, and she’s right. The contrast is glaring: the full 33-second answer in black and white, versus the 8-second soundbite CBS chose to air.

The Washington Examiner pointed out that CBS’s cut effectively airbrushed out Noem’s references to MS-13, spousal abuse, and child exploitation, which are all central to her point that Abrego Garcia “must never walk free in the United States.”

This isn’t just sloppy editing. It’s an editorial choice that sanitizes the reality of who this man is alleged to be, while making Noem look like she offered only a vague talking point.

It’s yet another example of legacy media tilting coverage to fit its narrative: soften the story, protect the left’s agenda, and downplay the violent crimes tied to illegal immigration.

 

UPDATE: Two days after publication, CBS reached out with a comment pointing out that after the airingf of the clip, the transcript and video they posted on YouTube had the full remarks.

Here is their statement in full.

Secretary Noem’s “Face The Nation” interview was edited for time and met all CBS News standards. The entire interview is publicly available on YouTube, and the full transcript was posted early Sunday morning at CBSNews.com.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

More people have viewed this on X than CBS has viewers. They are losers.

CBS News brought us news fraudcaster Dan Rather, and helped to lower the bar for journalism for decades thereafter.

JackinSilverSpring | September 1, 2025 at 12:44 pm

Is anyone surprised? Leftists are trying to invert morality by siding with criminals, by siding with illegal aliens, by siding with censorship and by siding with civil mayhem. The Leftists proclaim they are doing this to save our democracy; it’s more like to save their DemoncRat party.

If only cBS had been this circumspect about posting shit about Trump they might be at the very least thirty mill better off!!

CBS? The same CBS that deceptively edited the word salad interview of failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris(D) last November?

Hey, FCC. Can you just void their broadcast license already? CBS has made plain they’re not broadcasting in the public’s interest, but are an ‘inkind’ political activist organization for the democrat party.

Just void the CBS broadcast license already, FCC.

Pravda nye Izvestia, y Izvestia nye Pravda.

You truly know BS when you CBS.

CBS management doesn’t seem to have internalized the lesson about not deceptively editing. An edit that transforms/changes an answer to a question isn’t an edit for ‘time’. If run time is a concern they should ask very straightforward yes/no questions in good faith without any false premises.

If there ever is a civil war in the West, the last person in the world I’d want to be is any one of these smug journos.

Stop going on any show and any network that is dishonest. There is no need. There are other ways to get your messages out.

I’ve been evaluating information sources for 35 years (Army intel and law enforcement). All require, to a degree, a benefit of the doubt. However, ABC/NBC/CBS/NYT/WP etc, with anything slightly political issues requires the willing suspension of disbelief.

Prediction: I expect Trump will go for the jugular and yank their broadcast license. Liberals will scream censorship but, ironically, will be heard loud and clear on one of their other mouth organs. Mr. & Mrs. America, having lost all faith in broadcast news, will yawn.

Just when you thought you hated the media enough, they go above and beyond. Lamestream media is a living example of the parable; “If you make something idiot proof they will just build a better idiot.”

destroycommunism | September 1, 2025 at 3:35 pm

C we BS

if they didnt have this job

they’d be the next trans attackers of the schools

keep our children safe! defund lefty!!

The Gentle Grizzly | September 1, 2025 at 3:59 pm

CBS has a long history, including a lot of doctored editing of 60 Minutes. I am led to understand that – quite often – some “controversial” figure has been invited on for a segment, but when the potential interviewee said he’d make his own recording of the interview, the invitation was revoked.

I am not surprised/

So their excuse was, “She didn’t say ‘alleged’?”

Conservative Beaner | September 1, 2025 at 5:30 pm

Shameful is not a word I would use.

Liable or criminal or both is what I would use.

You cannot hate the legacy media enough.