Academic News Site Suggests Charlie Kirk Was a ‘Bigot’ in Assassination Coverage
“The story does acknowledge Kirk’s organizing skills.”
The murder of Charlie Kirk has brought out the ugliest side of the academic left.
The College Fix reports:
‘Kirk was a bigot,’ academic news site suggests in assassination coverage
An academic news site that is heavily subsidized by public universities suggested that Charlie Kirk “was a bigot,” in introducing its coverage of the brutal assassination of the Millennial conservative activist.
The Conversation, which has partnerships with major media companies including the Associated Press, included a short introduction this morning to its news stories.
“To some, Charlie Kirk, who was shot and killed yesterday at a rally in Utah, was a hero, the future of the Republican Party, a man whose many young followers stood in joyful attention as he spun his version of the conservative gospel,” Senior Editor Naomi Schalit wrote in the newsletter.
“To others, Kirk was a bigot, a spreader of misinformation and a political figure who thrived on outrage and intimidation,” Schalit (pictured) wrote. “But both his admirers and detractors would agree on one thing: Kirk and the organization he founded, Turning Point USA, were effective.“
The story does acknowledge Kirk’s organizing skills.
“The speaking event where Kirk was shot stands as a model of what the 31-year-old aimed to do: enlist young people across the nation into the conservative movement,” Schalit wrote. “But his killing has been characterized as the deadly outcome of America’s toxic and polarized politics.”
The publication, as reported by The College Fix, receives around $2 millions a year from taxpayers via public university membership fees.
Though The Conversation says it is focused on “journalistic flair” and “academic rigor,” an analysis found most of its coverage of Donald Trump is negative, with zero positive articles found.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
well if bigot means pro family pro american pro humanity…then ya
otherwise
stfu
The only bigot here is the Leftist, Naomi Schalit. Leftists belive they can never be wrong, so anyone on the Right must be wrong.
If that was the worst of what they said, this is a nothingburger. They succinctly summarized how both sides of the aisle viewed Charlie Kirk, and they were absolutely correct. I don’t see them lionizing or even choosing either viewpoint. You can replace the word “bigot” with “hero” and the headline will be just as accurate.
The Conversation routinely leans left.
This is mild stuff by their standards.