Mainstream Media, Academia Sacrifice Even More Credibility in Articles on Mayan Child Victims
Image 01 Image 03

Mainstream Media, Academia Sacrifice Even More Credibility in Articles on Mayan Child Victims

Mainstream Media, Academia Sacrifice Even More Credibility in Articles on Mayan Child Victims

Piece offered unquestioned defense of child slaughter: “It was a practice; it’s not that they were violent, it was their way of connecting with the celestial bodies.”

Archaeologists have uncovered a significant ancient altar in Tikal National Park, Guatemala, believed to have been used for human sacrifices, particularly of children, during the late 4th century CE.

This altar, attributed to the Teotihuacan culture from central Mexico, was found within a residential complex in the heart of the ancient Mayan city of Tikal, a major center of Mayan civilization.

It took experts a year and a half to uncover and analyse the altar before making the announcement, with the site being described as part of an abandoned “city of the gods”.

Archaeologist Lorena Paiz, who led the discovery, said the altar was believed to have been used for sacrifices, “especially of children”.

“The remains of three children not older than four years were found on three sides of the altar,” Paiz revealed.

The altar was found within a Teotihuacan residential complex which typically feature houses with rooms and central altars, according to Paiz.

And while the discovery might add an interesting new dimension to the historical accounts of the region, an academic’s attempt to paint the sacrifice of children as “not violent” and the unquestioning recitation of the explanation for it by mainstream media stirred a great deal of controversy.

And while CBS took the brunt of the criticism from social media, the line was parroted in other outlets. For example, here is the exact quote from the Associated Press.

María Belén Méndez, an archaeologist who was not involved with the project, said the discovery confirms “that there has been an interconnection between both cultures and what their relationships with their gods and celestial bodies was like.”

“We see how the issue of sacrifice exists in both cultures. It was a practice; it’s not that they were violent, it was their way of connecting with the celestial bodies,” she said.

The detached analysis hit a nerve, and the statement was slammed by many on social media. Mario Nawfal, entrepreneur and host of “The Roundtable Show” on X.com, derided it as a leftist attempt to defend the slaughter as “spiritual”.

Archaeologist María Belén Méndez claims this wasn’t violence at all—just a “connection with celestial bodies.”

This is the modern progressive mindset: romanticize ritual child murder, rewrite barbarism as cultural nuance, and call depravity “divine.”

These are the same people lecturing you about morality, history, and who should run society.

If you ever needed proof the far-left has completely lost its moral compass—this is it.

It’s a good time for a reminder that the Conquistadors, whose history has been rewritten to make them villains, had a great deal of help from neighboring tribes and peoples who were forced to contribute victims on a regular basis to these celestial abattoirs.

For example, the Tlaxcalans were the most important indigenous allies of Cortés. They were long-standing enemies of the Aztecs, having suffered from years of warfare and Aztec demands for tribute and human sacrifices. After initial battles with the Spanish, the Tlaxcalans decided to ally with Cortés, providing him with thousands of warriors, supplies, and strategic support. Their alliance was pivotal in the siege and eventual fall of Tenochtitlán, the Aztec capital.

Returning to the Mayans, it turns out that there is no consensus on how many of its people they “non-violently” sacrificed. Archaeological studies at sites like Chichén Itzá have uncovered dozens to hundreds of sacrificial victims, often children, but these numbers represent accumulations over centuries.

Meanwhile, this Holy Week, this is what the children of Guatemala are doing now.

One last note, as it is related:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 9
JackinSilverSpring | April 15, 2025 at 1:36 pm

For Leftists there is apparently not much if any difference between child sacrifice and late term abortion. What a perverse moralitymachine


     
     0 
     
     5
    NotCoach in reply to JackinSilverSpring. | April 15, 2025 at 1:38 pm

    Leftists tend towards defending the perverse and demonic.

    “Who is to say one side is better than the other?”

    We see this same nonsense all the time in the terrible fiction they produce.


       
       0 
       
       5
      B in reply to NotCoach. | April 15, 2025 at 2:06 pm

      “ who is to say one is better than the other”….until the one being sacrificed is you or your child, etc.


       
       0 
       
       2
      henrybowman in reply to NotCoach. | April 15, 2025 at 3:50 pm

      Every time I hear this complaint, the first thing my mind flies to are some of those terrible “morals” narrated at the very end of Twilight Zone episodes (the Canadian reboot, from 2002). In the context of the bizarre episode you just saw, they seem to barely make sense… and then you snap out of it and realize, “what the hell did he just say?” They’re monstrous.


     
     0 
     
     2
    jqusnr in reply to JackinSilverSpring. | April 15, 2025 at 2:01 pm

    science is the alter of the left
    no matter if it is abortion
    global warming or cooling
    (depending on time of year)
    or whatever else the come up with.


 
 1 
 
 11
NotCoach | April 15, 2025 at 1:36 pm

Archaeologists have uncovered a significant ancient altar in Tikal National Park, Guatemala, believed to have been used for human sacrifices, particularly of children, during the late 4th century CE.

CE? AD, please, if you don’t mind. I refuse to accept the modern change in our dating system.

“celestial abattoir” perfectly said though maudlin.

Would it have been different if the article had read

“Human sacrifice was part of their religion as it amongst the Phoenicians, Celts, Germanic tribes and other areas of ancient Europe this was not unique to Mesoamerica”


     
     1 
     
     7
    NotCoach in reply to Danny. | April 15, 2025 at 2:00 pm

    Do we excuse it for any past culture like they are trying to do here?


     
     3 
     
     2
    Dolce Far Niente in reply to Danny. | April 15, 2025 at 4:09 pm

    It wasn’t what the article was about, and your feeble “whataboutism” is typically and completely off the subject.

    And if the article *had* referenced European child sacrifice in eons past, no one here or in any conservative Christian group would have defended it, probably including you pagan leftists, because whipipo bad..


 
 0 
 
 2
geronl | April 15, 2025 at 1:58 pm

The left is very openly pro-violence. Doesn’t Planned Parenthood HQ have a statue of the Lilith outside? (ancient Jewish lore- I’ve heard- calls her the wife of Satan, a baby eater)


 
 1 
 
 7
Crawford | April 15, 2025 at 2:16 pm

The Romans were relatively open-minded on religion, but they absolutely despised cults that involved human sacrifice. One of their complaints against Carthage was their practice of infant sacrifice — an accusation that has been supported by archeology. They unashamedly extinguished the Bacchanals, Ba’alism, and Druidism for practicing human sacrifice.

Seems a saner model than excusing ritual murder.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Danny in reply to Crawford. | April 15, 2025 at 9:19 pm

    Exactly but there was no equivalent of the Roman Empire shutting down human sacrifice in Mesoamerica prior to Cortez.

    Explanation isn’t excusing but Mesoamerica just continued a superstition that was rightly stamped out in Europe because it didn’t understand how the world worked.


 
 0 
 
 5
ztakddot | April 15, 2025 at 2:42 pm

Media and Academics: Child sacrifice in Guatemala – sure no problem let’s
value cultural differences and all that

Also Media and Academics: Slavery in America – worst crime ever perpetuated by (white) man on (black) man staining entire country forever and requiring massive reparations and forced equality of outcome.

Gee, may be both can be considered bad in our current time and leave it at that don’t you think?

Weird how I am currently reading the chapter in VDH’s “The End Of Everything” about Hernan Cortes’ annihilation of the Aztec Empire. The child sacrifice upset him but what really disgusted him was what they did to captured Spaniards. “Plunging a knife into their chest, ripping their beating hearts out, and cooking their bodies with maize and offered to guests invited to the sacrificial feast”.

Cahokia, a major Mississippian culture near St Louis Mo, flourished around 1400 AD.

Cahokia people practiced human sacrifice. Excavations in 1967 uncovered a mass burial in Mound 72. Around 280 skeletons were uncovered. Around 80% of the bodies were young women. They were placed in neat rows and were likely killed by strangulation or blood-letting.

In a separate pit, there are around 40 men and women bodies. They were killed by violent means, including decapitation.

This is now called the Southeastern Ceremonial Complex but was formerly called the Southern Death Cult.


 
 0 
 
 2
scooterjay | April 15, 2025 at 3:16 pm

Their AI god will be MOLOCH…
Method Of Lessening Our Children’s Harm…and they will carry his will with their interpretation of love.


 
 1 
 
 1
scooterjay | April 15, 2025 at 3:19 pm

Witness the adoration by the left of one kid that took the life of another.
View the adulation for Mangione and Dzokhar before.
They sure need a heavy dose of their form of Democracy and we laugh at the bitter face from the taste.


 
 0 
 
 4
henrybowman | April 15, 2025 at 3:54 pm

Pardon me, Maria, would you please stand still while I test my knife?
This isn’t violence, you understand — I’m a metallurgist.


 
 0 
 
 5
Just Al | April 15, 2025 at 3:55 pm

“Mostly peaceful child sacrifices”


 
 0 
 
 4
diver64 | April 15, 2025 at 4:20 pm

I’ve toured several sights in Belize and Guatemala. The guides were carefully neutral on all of it just describing what were were looking at and what it was used for. To call sacrifice of any kind non violent is very odd. Strapping someone to a stone alter, killing them with a knife and cutting out the heart is violent no way around it. You can argue with the why of it and it is still argued but to try and play it off is bizarre.


     
     8 
     
     1
    JR in reply to diver64. | April 15, 2025 at 6:05 pm

    Burning women alive at the stake because some people thought they were “witches” occurred in America. We hung black people without a trial in the South based on mere allegations. So don’t be too quick to judge.


       
       0 
       
       8
      henrybowman in reply to JR. | April 15, 2025 at 6:16 pm

      Yup. The difference is, we don’t even attempt to argue that those things were right, or even neutral.


       
       0 
       
       5
      irishgladiator63 in reply to JR. | April 15, 2025 at 10:23 pm

      I’ll judge. Murdering children is bad. Burning people at the stake is also bad.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Azathoth in reply to JR. | April 16, 2025 at 11:01 am

      “Burning women alive at the stake because some people thought they were “witches” occurred in America. ”

      No. In the US, they were hung. One was pressed. No witches were burned in the US.

      The Burning was in Europe.

      “We hung people without a trial in the South based on mere allegations.”

      Fixed that for you. Whites as well as blacks were victims of lynching–and more whites than blacks were lynched.


 
 0 
 
 2
CommoChief | April 15, 2025 at 5:36 pm

Non violent’ used to describe ritual murder/sacrifice seems odd. To be fair though the last X post claiming the arrival of Christianity was synonymous with improved lives of Children is an interesting claim. Sure over long periods of time and certainly so in the 21st century. No question life is better today.

However it wasn’t as if the Spanish had such a touchy/feely bloodless conquest in the ‘New World’ creating a utopia that the survivors gleefully went to mining silver for them. Peonage was an evil reality for centuries. Lots of abuses remained into the 20th century by those using perverse versions of ‘Christian’ religion as an excuse to impose all sorts of evils and to assert control.


     
     0 
     
     1
    jb4 in reply to CommoChief. | April 15, 2025 at 7:02 pm

    I was on a tour many decades ago in Mexico City and went to the major cathedral. We were told that the peasants used to crawl on their hands and knees across a large plaza to give a piece of silver to the church.


       
       0 
       
       2
      CommoChief in reply to jb4. | April 15, 2025 at 7:46 pm

      Was it explained whether they wanted to or was it b/c they were made to do so to reinforce strict social hierarchy in part based on the very specific % of ‘blood’ ?

      No one, with any sense anyway, is gonna argue that 21st century modernity even in that of 2nd world Nations like Mexico is somehow not preferable to pre Columbian life. The issue is the period of time in between then and now. Lots of less than savory actions on the part of the Spanish gov’t and Catholic Church to advance their own power and wealth in the new world at others expense.

      We shouldn’t minimize or gloss over that history. Nor should we engage in inaccurate romanticism about the people and cultures present in pre Columbian new world. Instead we.should, IMO, attempt to view unfiltered history as it was in an unemotional, open minded way and avoid trying to find ways to advance any particular ideological narrative. All of it; the good, the bad and the ugly.


     
     0 
     
     2
    Christopher B in reply to CommoChief. | April 15, 2025 at 9:58 pm

    I’d have a similar reply to both you and Danny above.

    I believe that both Judaism and Christianity teach that humans are made in the image of God. This stands in pretty stark contrast to a religion that demands human sacrifices to obtain divine favor. There was no ‘advancement’ that generated this thought but it was a significant difference in perspective on human life.

    I certainly agree that the belief took a long time to evolve into our current understanding but the foundation was set and likely did have an impact on how the Spanish viewed the Aztec practices.


 
 0 
 
 3
DaveGinOly | April 15, 2025 at 6:15 pm

To people who believed child sacrifice defended the community from drought, crop failure, diseases, invaders, etc., it was a perfectly moral necessity. Today we know better. They did not. Thank science that has largely replaced god(s) with knowledge. We no longer react to disasters and the potential for disaster the way they did, for their lack of understanding the natural world. Science has advanced our morality by allowing us to recognize the futility of such acts as sacrifices. Sacrifices are immoral now because our understanding of nature rules against their utility.


 
 0 
 
 2
OldLawman | April 15, 2025 at 8:38 pm

You just can’t hate the MSM enough.


 
 0 
 
 1
great unknown | April 15, 2025 at 8:50 pm

As one of the great mistresses of ethics and philosophy of our times said, “It was rape, but it wasn’t rape rape.”


 
 0 
 
 2
IndianaGuy | April 15, 2025 at 9:14 pm

“Wherever Christians went, children’s lives got better.
They fought abuse, ended deadly customs, and transformed entire cultures to protect the vulnerable.”

This article ends with a couple of true statements. There have also been horrific atrocities committed by some that called themselves Christians, but that was a false claim. True Christians have always been a blessing to society. That is who we are called to be.


 
 0 
 
 1
guyjones | April 16, 2025 at 6:47 am

These are the same evil, leftist/Dhimmi-crat reprobates who rationalize, excuse and whitewash genocidal Islamfascism, terrorism and “holy war” practiced by certain goose-stepping, belligerent Muslims against Jews, Christians, Hindus and other non-Muslims as representing the understandable by-product of alleged Muslim grievance and victimhood.


 
 0 
 
 1
Azathoth | April 16, 2025 at 11:06 am

We no longer sacrifice children so that the drought will end, or to win a victory in war, or to keep the forces of darkness at bay.

No.

Today we sacrifice children so that mom can go drinking with her friends next weekend, or so she doesn’t lose her figure or have to take time off from her career..

And we do so in numbers that would astound the Aztec and Maya. Every day.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.