FDA’s Former “Top Vaccine Scientist” Forced Out after Denying HHS Secretary Unrestricted Access to Vaccine Injury Database
Marks’ expletive-filled explanations for leaving his agency indicate there are many good reasons for qualified database experts to dig into the VAERS system and circumspect medical professionals to assess the information they find.
As I write this piece, we are almost 80 days into the second term of President Donald Trump, and the news cycle is an F5 of the Fugita Tornado Scale.
Legal Insurrection readers may recall my post about the recent shake-up at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Dr. Peter Marks, the top vaccine official at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), resigned, citing significant disagreements with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over vaccine policies.
Marks claimed it was because of Kennedy, and the new HHS Secretary’s viewpoints on the worthiness of vaccines.
However, there is more to the story.
Marks left after refusing to grant Kennedy team unrestricted access to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. Marks asserted that such access could lead to manipulation or deletion of sensitive data, which includes unverified reports of vaccine-related adverse events submitted by the public.
In an interview with The Associated Press, former Food and Drug Administration vaccine chief Dr. Peter Marks discussed his efforts to “make nice” with Kennedy and address his longstanding concerns about vaccine safety, including by developing a “vaccine transparency action plan.”
Marks agreed to give Kennedy’s associates the ability to read thousands of reports of potential vaccine-related issues sent to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS. But he would not allow them to directly edit the data.
“Why wouldn’t we? Because frankly we don’t trust (them),” he said, using a profanity. “They’d write over it or erase the whole database.”
I believe Marks’ assertion about what Kennedy and his team is not founded in fact. Kennedy has explicitly said he wants to rely on real scientific data, and his long history in the legal profession would lead one to believe he understands the consequences of changing the database records or allowing someone on his team to do so.
Marks also continues to smear Kennedy as being completely anti-vaccine. As I noted with the measles outbreak in Texas, the HHS under Kennedy helped launch a vaccination program in addition to offering other recommendations for those opting not to get vaccinated.
HHS staffers also stressed this fact, and underscored the fact they want to look under-the-hood for the vaccine injury data themselves.
An HHS spokesperson said Kennedy has advocated for vaccination multiple times since becoming health secretary and pointed to a social media post Sunday in which he called the vaccine “the most effective way to prevent the spread of measles.”
The spokesperson added that it would make “perfect sense” for staffers working for Kennedy to seek access to the VAERS database to do their own analysis.
There are a number of reasons that this issue is troubling, especially given Marks’ profanity-infused response to the new HHS team seeking the usual level of access to government databases that the Secretary normally has. To begin with, as I have previously noted, studies have identified a rare but notable link between myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, such as Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
As a reminder, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) released 148 blank pages of data in response to a FOIA request for information connecting covid vaccinations to heart inflammation.
I reported that a large, multinational study of COVID-19 vaccines from companies like Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca has been linked to rare occurrences of heart, brain, and blood disorders. At this point, most rational health professionals would allow an individual to decide if the risk of heart, brain, and blood disorders outweigh the risk of experiencing COVID without the vaccine in any of its mutations and variations.
However, that study was only one of many that have been done to assess the COVID-19 vaccine side effects. Another project was proposed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Myocarditis Outcomes after mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Investigation (MOVING) in October 2021.
As a reminder, myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the lining around the heart. The agency has already released some reports, such as this one in The Lancet, which asserted that virus-caused myocarditis was worse than the one that arose post-vaccination.
The CDC "released" a 148 page study on myocarditis after COVID-19 "vaccination" and every single page is completely redacted. This must be a new record. https://t.co/kIE2s7Wl2z pic.twitter.com/M6xDbRYMZx
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) March 7, 2024
Covid is only one of many vaccines being offered. In total, children may receive over a dozen different vaccines across multiple doses throughout their development. Adults typically require fewer vaccines but may need boosters or additional shots based on health risks and travel needs.
How much data related to vaccine injuries for other products resides on that database?
Finally, a recent study conducted by the Cleveland Clinic has raised concerns about the effectiveness of this season’s flu vaccine. Published as a preprint on MedRxiv, the research analyzed data from 53,402 healthcare workers during the 2024-2025 flu season and found that vaccinated individuals had a 27% higher risk of contracting influenza compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.
The calculated vaccine effectiveness was reported as -26.9%, indicating that the vaccine may have increased the risk of infection rather than reducing it.
“This study found that influenza vaccination of working-aged adults was associated with a higher risk of influenza during the 2024-2025 respiratory viral season, suggesting that the vaccine has not been effective in preventing influenza this season,” the researchers wrote in the study.
In conclusion, Marks’ expletive-filled explanations for leaving his agency indicate there are many good reasons for qualified database experts to dig into the VAERS system and circumspect medical professionals to assess the information they find.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
ok so this person decides that his boss shud not have full access to information that his boss is responsible for.
ok got it..
don’t let the door hit ya where the good Lord split ya.
Looks like he vastly over-estimated his own importance.
That seems to be the order of the day at NIH and CDC.
Proof the guy is full of it:
They have (should have) backups of data
Archive the one right before access is granted and you can always compare
Let know the person granted access have an archived copy so they will not manipulate. It will also facilitate finding differences
As a side note, the VAERS database likely already has auditing facilities in them by logging changes
So in both cases the guy was trying to hide and stonewall access
The first thing that came to mind was another tyrant with a God complex.
A tin-plated dictator with delusions of godhood.
Or someone who was given orders to hide stuff forever.
a tyrant with poor communication skills .. the use of profanity is a sign of poor communication ability and a lackluster education.
This is just a silly comment. He maybe a tyrant but the rest is garbage. He is someone out of his depth who lost site of the big picture and let his emotions get the better of him. Happens to the best and worst of us. Firing him is the right thing absolutely.
““Why wouldn’t we? Because frankly we don’t trust (them),” he said”
So?
YOU had access to it all this time, and American doesn’t trust YOU.
As usual, we must take what the Leftist says and turn it inside out to determine what really motivates him – He’s afraid that others may discover that his people have manipulated the database and deleted information.
‘Read Only’ access should suffice for Kennedy and Co. to see the data. Marks isn’t claiming that was the problem though, but rather policy differences.
FWIW, and irrespective of whether Kennedy should have administrator access to the database, it can be poor policy to do everything from a single account, though most do, especially home PC users. The reality is mistakes can happen. In my own case I semi-accidentally duplicated a classification scheme at a lower level. I say semi- because I was trying something and it didn’t work correctly. Unfortunately that necessitated intervention by the UK provider to undo my error. Oops!!!
Given Kennedy and Co. will have no experience with the database, and without knowing precisely how it operates, it’s all too believable that errors could occur by mistake.
With all due respect, Marks is an oncologist by training, and hardly an expert in Databases. I’m fairly certain that RFK will be bringing database experts who know a lot more about how these things work than Marks. Databases these days are robust, meaning that the data will not easily be destroyed, and changes can be tracked. Any IT department worth their pay will have all kinds of backups, which will prevent any data being lost. I think it is far more likely that Marks doesn’t want RFKs people doing their own searches on the database.
Concur.
Marks is not IT qualified. So what, exactly, makes him such an expert in the system.
The actual solution to this alleged problem would be to assign IT experts to the Kennedy team that would aid them in accessing the database to ensure they could access the data without causing problems.
Instead, he stonewalled, and tried to hide behind giving them access to “thousands of reports”. There are millions of reports. He was offering them a tiny fraction of the database and acting like it was some kind of massive magnanimous effort on his part, instead of a lying leftist bureaucratic hack trying to stop them from seeing the real data.
I get what you are saying here. I work in IT and my main contact with databases is to be sure the machines they are installed on run fine and the DB gets backed up every night. However we are talking about the federal government here. The same government that had a 349 yr old person listed as living in the SS database. So not saying the DBAs are bad but lets just say quality control is not the government’s strong suit. And the government is really bad about spending money in one part of an agency while letting other parts run on very outdated equipment and software. Everything DOGE is finding could be fixed or prevented with simple controls. Your data entry people put in a birthdate that is 120 yrs in the past and listed as living a flag goes to someone to check up on it. A payment goes out with no payment code, an auditor gets notified before a check is cut. These are really simple things private businesses have been doing for years.
Irrelevant BS.
Kennedy is the HHS Secretary. He runs the department. An unelected bureaucrat DOES NOT GET to say that the HHS isn’t allowed to do something in his department.
And the clear implication of his BS is he wasn’t even going to give them access AT ALL, only to ‘thousands’ of reports. No. ALL OF THE DATA, ALL OF THE REPORTS. This isn’t a negotiation. You will do as you are told by your superior, or you will be removed.
Refusing to allow them to edit it and cloaking it in the BS of ‘well they might make a mistake’ is just an excuse. He doesn’t want them to be able to look at clear vaccine injuries that they have intentionally labeled otherwise and correct them.
Just like when we had multiple gunshot victims ‘dying of COVID’ according to the government database.
Marks wanted them to only have access to information HE wanted them to know, and not have the ability to see the data that would prove him a liar.
That’s why backups exist.
‘“I do believe that autism does come from vaccines,” Kennedy said in a 2023 interview with Fox News.’ (Time magazine, January 29, 2025)
I would post a link to this Time magazine article, but when I post links here, my comment is removed. You can find it by searching for “robert f kennedy jr vaccine statements”. There are many other interesting aspects of Kennedy’s hostility to vaccines covered in the Time magazine article.
This whole anti-vaccine thing in the conservative world is indicative of a schism. Anti-vaxxers are – like the majority of the commenters on this website – tribalist conservatives. Principled conservatives like me recognize Kennedy for what he is: a crank.
“But he would not allow them to directly edit the data.”
Why on earth would Kennedy need to “edit” the data? Look at it, I can understand. But edit it? You might say he has the authority to get editing access to anything under him. Ok, fine. But that reminds me of Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson’s response to why – repeat, WHY – he shut down shotspotter: Because I have the AUTHORITY to do so. Yes, Brandon, you do indeed have the authority to do so. And yes, Kennedy, you do indeed have the authority to edit this database. But why would you need to?
Side notes about this piece:
“I believe Marks’ assertion about what Kennedy and his team is not founded in fact.” Huh? Grammar much?
“HHS staffers also stressed this fact, and underscored the fact they want to look under-the-hood for the vaccine injury data themselves.” Again – you want to “look under-the-hood”, that’s one thing. You want to edit the database, that’s quite another. Stop being disingenous about this matter.
Pointing out rare side effects of vaccines is, to me, a bit ridiculous. Yes, there are indeed rare side effects to vaccines. And every other medical intervention in existence.
“In conclusion, Marks’ expletive-filled explanations for leaving his agency indicate there are many good reasons for qualified database experts to dig into the VAERS system and circumspect medical professionals to assess the information they find.” Dig into it. Assess it. I’m all for it. But don’t edit it.
Did you know that among the Amish, the only children known to suffer from autism are those who have been vaccinated. In a group that generally shuns vaccines, that’s highly unusual. There are studies linking autism to vaccines, but of course they’ve been ignored. Kennedy isn’t whistling in the dark here.
Kennedy’s main shtick isn’t that vaccines are unsafe, it’s that most haven’t been proven safe (contrary to popular belief). He’s right. There’s also surprisingly little evidence that some vaccines (polio comes to mind) had little to do with a particular disease’s eradication.
If none of these beliefs are correct, a scientist would welcome a hard look at the data because it would prove the sceptic wrong. So why are so many opposed to the hard look?
Yup.
We’re tribal cranks.
Well at least you’re honest with yourself.
You should try it sometime.
‘Edit it” – as Inigo Montoya might respond – “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”. You (and the drone who just lost his position) seem to think it’s in any way normal or useful to falsify raw data if you have access to it. Nope. That is data fraud, and as long as the raw data is not treated as a closely help proprietary secret to be kept from others and the hoi polloi (as I mentioned elsewhere) is easily outed as fraud. It’s quite telling and a big red flag that this guy feels the need to keep his own boss from having access. If they both worked at a financial institution it would be a trigger for audits and a colonoscopy of this guy’s personal financials.
“Edit it” access – for a database – as any database IT person could tell you – is not merely the ability to edit, add, or delete raw data contained in the DB – but also the ability to edit relationships and categories in the DB. This can be quite important when making inferences from a DB – in fact incorrect setup of the DB – deliberate or otherwise – can easily make incorrect inferences inevitable.
One particular DB I worked with at a prior employer had a clever thesaurus-like feature quite useful if used correctly. If you wanted (say) to search for scientific papers concerning (say) primate flu disease you could search for “primate” and it would include primate studies that never used the word “primate”, just the specific species. Incredibly powerful for medical animal studies. And, with Edit access, could be applied and tailored to a host of other scientific DB uses. With edit access.
And editing the DB treatment of raw data itself doesn’t destroy the original raw data, no more than changing a spreadsheet’s layout and calculations destroys the spreadsheet’s raw data. The raw data is still in there, and any funny business in how it’s treated is easily found it IF MORE THAN ONE PERSON HAS ACESS to it and the DB. Telling your boss he can’t / shouldn’t be able to verify your work doesn’t fly in business and shouldn’t in govt work either. It’s red flag of red flags that an audit is in order, likely following the firing so you can’t cook the audit as well.
Marks is an idiot. How the hell did he ever graduate high school let along medical school, What did he think was going to happen when he defied his boss? This was probably just his ego at play or he had something nefarious to obfuscate or protect. If he was really that concerned he could have played nice and been part of the team looking at the data.
Sounds like a bunch of BS to me, the lying bastard deserved to get fired
Insubordination is something that can’t be allowed to go unnoticed. If you don’t respond quickly, you lose your credibility. Especially if it is in the higher ranks. Bravo to Sec Kennedy for sending a clear message.
Having managed a 20T data warehouse, I think I have at least a passing knowledge of them. I and my number 2 were the only ones with unrestricted access, but we rarely used it. We had other accounts with more restricted access used for most operations. Those working with the data had varying degrees of access ranging from read only, create a new record, modify an existing record, etc. Their job determined their access. The fact that Kennedy wants full access doesn’t mean that everyone he sends will have full access. In fact, that would be stupid.
If they are in any way professional, the IT dept has multiple data backup copies; on site, off site and in the cloud or with a company that specializes in data security. Also, the database automatically timestamps entries and creates a transaction journal showing who was accessing what and when. If they’re really concerned about loss or corruption, freeze a copy and move it offline. That’s your reference.
IMO, this talk of unrestricted access is just FUD from people who have something to hide.
As someone with IT experience, especially in DataBase design and admin, I have to advise the reader that there are multiple non-nefarious reasons to allow both raw data access & edit access to a DB. Especially if you suspect the current key holders have been “cooking the books” to make a DB support wanted conclusions. Edit access allows you to look for groupings in the data that may not be obvious because of the way the raw data is currently organized and categorized. Or to look for improper groupings that make conclusions based on them garbage.
As an example, the “sky-is-falling” Covid panic was at least in part supported by “death by Covid” numbers that often assumed if you died and had Covid at the time that it was a Covid death. Washington State DOH, for instance, has since admitted “DOH includes deaths of all persons who tested positive for COVID-19 in its totals, even if the victims died from other causes, such as gunshot wounds.”.
Other examples include crime statistics databases where politicians and law enforcement have played games with crime categories to be able to tout imaginary “decrease in crime X” or “increase in arrests for crime Y” for their own reasons. Most recently, the Biden administration database of border enforcement stats famously was used to tout that Biden was “tough on illegal entries” when in actuality the raw data showed they were touting catch-and-release interceptions the same as actual prevention of illegal entries.
If folks have lost respect for scientific experts, it’s because all too many have taken to treating access to the raw data and descriptions of the data manipulation used to reach their “expert” conclusions as closely held proprietary secrets not be disclosed to the hoi polloi. That is NOT good scientific practice and is a huge red flag. You see it all over in climate “science”, and it’s spread like a cancer thru science in general lately.
“Marks asserted that such access could lead to manipulation or deletion of sensitive data…”
He said without evidence.
The hubris of these tone-deaf, democracy denying, self-important ‘experts’ who crap all over the decisions of their boss simply confirms my demand to ‘burn it all down, and hang all the traitors.’
We cannot share a country w/ these people.
I said what I said.
I think others here will appreciate Vinay Prasad, M.D. talk titled “RFK cuts HHS, NIH cuts grants (are they valuable), Peter Marks and more.” Spoiler, he is no fan of Marks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDyLxky0MmE
At this point I begin to wonder if there are any Government Agencies that do not think they are unaccountable to anyone.
Accountable not unaccountable
You’ve just rediscovered The Swamp, from its opposite coast.
Didin’t Dr Kory come back on “those” measles outbreaks in Texas and discover that even though “measles” was found, it was the medical care?
I think what Covid did is expose that our great medical care is run by a bunch of hack doctors. Once we realize that the margin of error is quite large we can look at it differently.
It is harder and harder to find good doctors. We are force to find PA or NP who are actually more in touch with the patient than some doctors.
We really have to get our youth in to being interested in being a doctor. I can find one for my son that is in their earlier 30s without them being foreign trained.
We have a serious problem with our higher education.
To be clear, I was talking about the two children deaths that were loudly announced to be caused by measles that were not. Kinda like the stupid decision to move Covid patients in to living conditions where there are at risk residents like in New York. I have been lucky to have great doctors but I have seen a good bunch that are not so great. Our professional standard have drop drastically for many professions since I been alive base on my observation.
There are roughly 550 cases in Texas so not much to worry about. Probably a bigger problem is what those hordes of 3rd world unvaccinated invaders Biden imported are bringing next?
Marks’ attitude is sadly typical of many government bureaucrats. Back in the 90’s my job put me in contact with many in the FDA, EPA, NIST, DOE, and others. I was explicitly told multiple times that because the function of that agency was so important, they were thus independent of the rest of the federal government, and only had to report to congress for funding.
“Marks asserted that such access could lead to manipulation or deletion of sensitive data,”
As if the whole system hasn’t been manipulated.
You can’t handle the truth is the only other line I think of.
Aren’t all these databases backed up? Given the nature of the database, aren’t there true copies residing in other locations?
Methinks Marks doth protest too much!
Any ethical computerist knows that the first thing you do when working with edit-access data – be it program source code or a database – is to make an off-system copy of the original files. That way, in the event of an error, you can revert to the original working copy and start over.
Additionally, in the case of databases, there are some analysis functions that cannot be performed without edit access (some have been described above).
Marks’ denial of access t0 Kennedy and his team can have only one reason – hiding his manipulation of the data to support a political narrative.
For the record, I earned my programming degree in 1991.
I’m guessing that Marks knows for a fact that those on his side of the equation would delete data contradicting their agenda in a heartbeat. He assumes that everyone else is as lacking in ethics as his own allies. Pathetic, isn’t it?
The explanation for his behavior is self-evident from his statement that:
“…such access could lead to manipulation or deletion of sensitive data, which includes unverified reports of vaccine-related adverse events submitted by the public.”
It is 100% tied to the horrific side-effects of the Pfizer Covid-Jab (note – it is NOT a vaccine, it is an mRNA genetic manipulation of your body’s own cells in order to produce virus-like protein spikes). These side-effects are now so well-known and numerous that it is probable to the point of certainty that orders of magnitude more people have died of the jab than ever died directly of the Covid. Heart attacks in otherwise healthy people, blood clots/strokes, not to mention the horrible turbo-cancers I’ve personally watched kill otherwise healthy people within months of being diagnosed. All preceded by getting the jab and/or boosters.
The entire deep-state apparatus is desperately trying to cover up their complicity with the CCP and the DNC in coordinating the response to Covid, which was 100% devoted to preventing Trump from re-election. A perfect decapitation strike since they knew he was a germo-phobe and could easily manipulate him, and he fell right into it.
But now the information is coming out, and they are trying to prevent it by either destroying it or altering it. Project much? With the current crop of Democrats/Socialists/Communists in our government, all you have to do is look at what they are accusing the Rep-wing of, and you can understand that this is what THEY are actually DOING.
The vile Dhimmi-crats’ penchant for spewing expletives goes beyond displaying their contemptible infantilism, immaturity and incivility. It’s a reflection of an imperially arrogant and unprofessional apparatchik class that believes itself to be above accountability to the proletariat and immune from scrutiny/transparency.
My perfectly healthy husband had a stroke following his third COVID shot. Nine tests later three cardiologists cannot tell what caused his stroke. Thankfully he is fully recovered but we certainly want someone to take a look at all the vaccine data.
“But he would not allow them to directly edit the data.”
That’s the way the AP reporter characterized it. He or she offered no evidence that this is what Kennedy’s team had in mind. All that was offered was this quote from Marks:
“Why wouldn’t we? Because frankly we don’t trust (them),” he said, using a profanity. “They’d write over it or erase the whole database.”
Marks clearly knows nothing about databases, or he wouldn’t put it this way. I will say up front that since the reporter never bothered to find out what kind of database system is being used, none of us can say for sure how it works. A quick search shows that VAERS is on the CDC Wonder database. Unfortunately, that also tells us nothing. Is that an ancient, propietary system built before the introduction of relational databases? Is that just branding that actually uses Oracle, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, DB2, MySQL, or something else as the actual database engine? There are dozens of possibilities here, so I’m going to try to stick with the few things that most of them have in common.
First of all, if someone says they want “Full Access” to a database, I don’t really know what they want, so I will meet with them to discuss their needs. The most likely scenario is that they just want to be able to connect to and read anything from every table in every database. The next most likely is that they want to be able to insert, update, and delete records. Rights and privileges in databases can be sliced up dozens of different ways, and the instinct of every database administrator is to follow the principle of least privilege. Usually when you meet with someone to discuss access to databases you find out that they really don’t want the ability to do everything because they don’t want to accidentally “break” something. My instinct is that, at most, Kennedy’s team wanted “read/write” access to everything. That’s actually a simple and reasonable request, especially if it’s coming from the department head who OWNS THE DATA and has every right to ask for administrator rights (a much more powerful set of rights) if he wanted them.
Secondly, any database administrator that knows what he is doing backs up all databases regularly and maintains a series of backups going back several days. Depending on the frequency of data changes, he is likely to set up incremental or log backups that will run every few minutes and allow for point-in-time recovery of the data. For high-value and historical data, there will likely be on-site and off-site backups, with the off-site backups maintained for months and even years. No one competent simply leaves data exposed and unrecoverable so that a malicious actor could wipe out everything in one stroke.
Finally, anyone who offers you “thousands of reports” but won’t let you query the data directly is hiding something. Reports are nothing more than the results of someone else’s queries of the data. You have no idea what they were looking for, what they filtered out, or how the query itself adjusted the data returned to produce a different output.
One important part of the database would be the log, which, if it hasn’t been altered or deleted, might show when and by whom changes have been made to the records in the database. The backups should be examined too.
Does Marks have any connections with Big Pharma?
Didn’t the CDC change the definition of a vaccine because the Covid medical treatment shots did not go through the rigorous testing of vaccines for polio, measles, etc.? If you’re going to change the definition of something that’s been around for how long? I’d want to look at it, too.
Fun Fact: Marks speciality is Oncology.
He has no background in immunology, and describing him as a “vaccine specialist” is ludicrous.
Neither did Fauci but for some reason everyone bypassed people who did for a statement from that malignant little gnome.
“Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science.” -Dr. Anthony Fauci
Are you attacking science, diver64? Such things are not permitted. Report to Reeducation Camp 613, Section 43, Room 22. When you enter, sit in the BLUE chair. Disobedience will not be tolerated.
Someone will be with you shortly.
WHY does HHS need write access? Read access is what they should have. I am becoming suspicious of RFK Jr. Granted, we were warned about him by his family, and maybe it wasn’t just sour grapes.
Maybe RFK Jr. DOES want to write over the database. Why else would read access not be enough?
Your suspicion is born of ignorance. Look at BobM’s post above.
Yes, check my posts for a fuller explanation of how “edit” access to a DB is not by any means a red flag for planning to subvert or corrupt the raw data. Raw data is rarely the be all and end of a DB – it’s the derived data and data relationships that allow for powerful ability to correctly (or incorrectly) draw inferences.
NTM you are buying into an underlying (or under-lie-ing, perhaps) premise that the COPY of the raw data currently stored in the DB is the original. And only.
Leave a Comment