China Responds to US tariffs with Export Controls on Critical Rare Earth Minerals
Image 01 Image 03

China Responds to US tariffs with Export Controls on Critical Rare Earth Minerals

China Responds to US tariffs with Export Controls on Critical Rare Earth Minerals

Between Trump’s recent executive order on mining and all our own mineral deposits, we are posed for the American Gold Rush of the New Millennium….this time on the critical minerals China is trying to hoard.

China recently imposed export restrictions on seven types of rare earth elements as part of its response to President Donald Trump’s new tariffs. These measures mark an escalation in trade tensions between the two nations. They are framed by Beijing as necessary for national security and strategic interests, which Legal Insurrection has followed closely.

The curbs apply to medium and heavy rare earth elements, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. These restrictions cover raw materials, alloys, oxides, compounds, and finished products, such as permanent magnets and target materials used in high-tech manufacturing.

The export curbs include not only mined minerals but permanent magnets and other finished products that will be difficult to replace, analysts said.

The move, which affects exports to all countries, not just the U.S., is the latest demonstration of China’s ability to weaponize its dominance over the mining and processing of the critical minerals.

Seven categories of medium and heavy rare earths, including samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium-related items, will be placed on an export control list as of April 4, according to a Ministry of Commerce release.

Lockheed Martin Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and Apple are among the U.S. companies that use Chinese rare earths in their supply chains.
“China made that list strategically,” said Mel Sanderson, a director at American Rare Earths (ARR.AX), which is building a Wyoming rare earths mine it hopes to open by 2029, and co-chair of the Critical Minerals Institute trade group. “They picked the things that are crucial for the U.S. economy.”

However, before engaging in tariff-based-panic, it’s good to note that Trump recently invoked the Defense Production Act (DPA) to accelerate domestic production of critical minerals. The initiative aims to reduce American reliance on foreign imports, particularly from China, and gives Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Energy, and Secretary of Agriculture great power over what can be mined and where.

Before issuing the tariffs, Trump foresaw the need to counter China’s mineral mining offensive.

This development can be paired with even more good news. Recent developments in California’s rare earth mining sector have begun focusing on the Mountain Pass Mine, located near the Nevada border. This mine is the only active large-scale rare earth element mine in the United States and plays a pivotal role in domestic rare earth production.

Historically discovered in 1949, the Mountain Pass deposit revealed bastnaesite, an ore rich in rare earth elements such as neodymium, europium, and dysprosium, critical for modern technologies and military equipment. Now the site has begun prefining these minerals, which was a step that we relied heavily on China to complete.

However, to address the dependency on foreign processing, MP Materials is investing heavily in building a fully domestic rare earth supply chain. At its Mountain Pass mine in California, the company is enhancing its processing and separation capabilities to refine rare earth elements on-site.

Meanwhile, at its new Independence facility in Fort Worth, Texas, MP Materials has begun producing neodymium-praseodymium (NdPr) metal and trialing sintered neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets. This facility marks the first domestic production of these critical materials in decades, with the capability to produce 1,000 metric tons of magnets annually, amounting to the production of roughly half a million EV motors.

“This is our ultimate goal,” says Matt Sloustcher, EVP of Corporate Affairs for MP Materials. “To handle the entire separation and refining process on-site—but that ramp-up takes time.”

The U.S. Department of Defense recognized the strategic importance of expanding the capability and awarded MP Materials a $35 million contract to rev up processing capabilities.

Also in California is the Salton Sea region in Southern California, home to one of the largest lithium reserves in the world. This resource holds immense potential for transforming the U.S. lithium supply chain and contributing to the global energy transition.

The Salton Sea’s geothermal brine reservoir contains an estimated 18 million metric tons of lithium, enough to support the production of over 375 million electric vehicle (EV) batteries. The US Department of Energy estimates that this resource could meet all domestic lithium needs and potentially provide a surplus for export. Last year, a lithium extraction plant was started there.

As a reminder, last year, it was discovered that Wyoming was home to 2 billion metric tons of rare earth minerals.

Between Trump’s executive order and all our own mineral deposits, we are posed for the American Gold Rush of the New Millennium, this time involving rare earth minerals.

Turns out my stocks in the Wyoming mine (a Valentine’s Day present from my husband) may be the only ones worth something!

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Wyoming knows how to mine.

I bet they could get it open next year if motivated.


     
     0 
     
     2
    PrincetonAl in reply to Andy. | April 9, 2025 at 5:27 am

    This is excellent news as it accelerates the shift of rare earth mining outside of China or China’s control (it’s such an ugly process that even China prefers to bribe other poor countries to do it for them)

    Tariffs can backfire (in either direction) in exactly this way, but I will take the win on this one.


 
 0 
 
 4
ztakddot | April 8, 2025 at 5:35 pm

I despise China and it’s leader Winnie for their system and the lying, but they play a better game than we do. We’re so stupid. We have had lots of advantages but we just give them all away. As a result they steal us blind.
Of course it’s not all stupidity. A lot of it is due to short sighter greed by our politicians and business executives.


     
     0 
     
     1
    healthguyfsu in reply to ztakddot. | April 8, 2025 at 10:07 pm

    We can easily fight back by reducing lithium batteries on certain things, cars in particular. We can also produce fewer solar panels. All of this while mining our own and possibly striking a deal with Greenland as a bonus.


     
     0 
     
     0
    WTPuck in reply to ztakddot. | April 9, 2025 at 10:38 am

    I think you mean that a lot of our politicians (looking specifically at the Biden family and associates, and Gavin Newsome) are owned by China.


 
 1 
 
 3
gonzotx | April 8, 2025 at 5:41 pm

Dang, you
Mean no more wind mills?


     
     0 
     
     1
    Hodge in reply to gonzotx. | April 8, 2025 at 8:48 pm

    Well, not as many electric cars, anyhow. As I understand things, EV batteries are the major users of lithium. You might want to stock up on AA lithium batters for your TV remote.


       
       0 
       
       1
      healthguyfsu in reply to Hodge. | April 8, 2025 at 10:08 pm

      My remote for my most recent Samsung TV is a USB plug-in charge built in battery plus it has one of those photovoltaic cells from a calculator to charge it naturally. It’s brilliant.


         
         0 
         
         0
        diver64 in reply to healthguyfsu. | April 9, 2025 at 5:01 am

        I don’t know why there are any watch batteries that are not solar rechargeable. I’ve had a couple of Casio’s for several years and they are great.


         
         0 
         
         0
        Lucifer Morningstar in reply to healthguyfsu. | April 9, 2025 at 12:59 pm

        Until the battery goes flat and can’t be recharged through the USB port or by the photovoltaic cell. And you discover you cannot easily replace the battery with a new. Then it’s simply more e-waste to dispose of because you have to buy a completely new Samsung remote to control that Samsung TV.

        The joys or a disposable society where it’s easier to buy a new electronic thingamabob than it is to replace a battery ore repair an item. How did we get to this point.


 
 1 
 
 4
smooth | April 8, 2025 at 5:42 pm

Its not obvious that china provides any unique products or services to US. China only has cost advantage.


     
     0 
     
     6
    Dolce Far Niente in reply to smooth. | April 8, 2025 at 7:23 pm

    China only has a “cost” advantage because they refuse to use even 19th century safety procedures (much less 21st century safety) and are willing to make human slaves do their mining.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Lucifer Morningstar in reply to Dolce Far Niente. | April 9, 2025 at 12:52 pm

      Safety procedures? Safety procedures?!?! China doesn’t use any safety procedures in industry and production. If the CCP and big business in China kills a few hundred Chinamen in a week there’s plenty more of them that will take their place. And that’s why China has a “cost advantage” over the United States.

      That and no Unions to demand better working conditions and the like.


 
 1 
 
 4
henrybowman | April 8, 2025 at 6:16 pm

Meanwhile, while we’re waiting for the mines to ramp up, we can always recycle the rare earths from the hundreds of thousands of EVs that will be sitting idle on lots and docks because the American public is no longer being FORCED to buy them.


 
 1 
 
 0
destroycommunism | April 8, 2025 at 6:41 pm

china already controlled what they would let us buy


 
 0 
 
 2
FelixTheCat | April 8, 2025 at 6:56 pm

“Turns out my stocks in the Wyoming mine (a Valentine’s Day present from my husband) may be the only ones worth something!”

Props to based husband.

Good.
The very idea of being dependent on a possible adversary for strategic resources like rare earth elements is a bad idea. The sooner we can rely instead on internal and friendly foreign sources instead the better off we’ll be in the long run.

Next up – drill baby drill.
Under Trump 1.0 we achieved net energy independence for fossil fuels for the first time in quite a bit. Which was thrown away by the Biden puppet admin. Hopefully under Trump 2.0 we can re-achieve that. Not only are we better off strategically, but if it lowers energy costs it lowers the cost of EVERYTHING else. NTM the less oil money flowing into the Middle East the less money available to finance terrorism.

So, win, win, win.
Only losers would be career politicians with less sources to milk for not-quite-a-bribe money to flow into their own coffers.

I thought the actions against Tesla meant that Climate Change was no longer an “existential threat” and “who cares” about making EV’s. /s


     
     0 
     
     0
    Andy in reply to jb4. | April 9, 2025 at 7:54 am

    If Tesla needs those minerals, Musk will have those Wyoming mines open next Thursday. The idiot cost factor will be reduced significantly compared to China.


 
 0 
 
 1
Aarradin | April 9, 2025 at 2:36 am

Highlights that absolute necessity of developing our own resources.

Which Trump was already focused on to begin with.

I don’t see China coming off well on this, though. They export three times as much to the US as we do to them. And, this administration’s (very wise) policy is to deliberately decouple the US from dependence on Chinese exports as much as possible, along with a strong determination to reshore our manufacturing base – much of which was off-shored to China.

For China, the 100+% tariffs Trump hit them with as of midnight last night are going to be a major problem. Their economy has significant internal problems, and is heavily geared toward – and dependent upon – foreign exports.

Too proud to give Trump what he was asking for, they’re now going to be in a world of hurt, and then have to come crawling to Trump for a deal – and he’ll make sure they get far worse of a deal than they would have gotten to begin with if they’d played nice.


 
 0 
 
 0
diver64 | April 9, 2025 at 4:59 am

It’s almost like someone has been saying for years that letting China control rare earths while shutting down American mines was not a good thing. They paid Biden well and here is the payoff. If Harris were President we would be over a barrel right now.


 
 0 
 
 0
mailman | April 9, 2025 at 6:41 am

The thing is these rare earth minerals aren’t actually all that rare.

The problem is the environmental challenge to extract them, hence why China has a head start on everyone because they aren’t constrained by pesky environmental concerns like the west. Hence why we outsource the production of these minerals to places like China.


 
 0 
 
 0
Martin | April 9, 2025 at 2:32 pm

I never really understood why we opened China in the first place. I think it was to separate them from the USSR but I don’t think China and the USSR would have lasted much longer than the USSR did by itself. It is possible that they would have lasted less time and we wouldn’t still have a billion people directly enslaved by communism.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.