Image 01 Image 03

Stacey Abrams’ Linked Nonprofit Spent $1.9 Billion in Taxpayer Funds on Supposed Appliance Upgrades

Stacey Abrams’ Linked Nonprofit Spent $1.9 Billion in Taxpayer Funds on Supposed Appliance Upgrades

“These NGOs were created for the first time, many of them, just to get this money. And they’re pass-throughs.”

In December, Brent Efron, a Biden appointee at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), told an undercover reporter from Project Veritas that “it truly feels like we’re on the Titanic and we’re throwing gold bars off the edge.” He admitted that EPA management was rushing to move billions of taxpayer dollars out the door before Inauguration Day, “before they [Trump appointees] come in and stop it all.” Efron saw these efforts as “an insurance policy against Trump winning.”

Asked where the “gold bars” were going, Efron replied, “Nonprofits, states, tribes, cities.”

You may recall that several days into his new job, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin made a startling announcement. In a reference to the Project Veritas video, he said his team had found some of the “gold bars.”

Shockingly, roughly 20 billion of your tax dollars were parked at an outside financial institution by the Biden EPA. This scheme was the first of its kind in EPA history and it was purposefully designed to obligate all of the money in a rushed job with reduced oversight. Even further, this pot of $20 billion was awarded to just eight entities that were then responsible for doling out your money to NGOs and others at their discretion, with far less transparency. Just under $7 billion was sent to one entity called the Climate United Fund.

I will be referring this matter to the Inspector General’s office and will work with the Justice Department.

The days of irresponsibly shoveling boatloads of cash to far-left activist groups in the name of environmental justice and climate equity are over.

Another entity, one that is linked to Stacey Abrams—who is best known for refusing to concede Georgia’s 2018 gubernatorial race—received $1.9 billion. This organization, called Power Forward Communities (PFC), had been in existence for a matter of months and showed revenue of $100 before receiving this massive grant.

HotAir‘s David Strom reported that PFC was “established in October 2023 as a coalition of groups led by Rewiring America, a left-wing group that advocates for electrification policies and a transition away from fossil fuel dependence.” Abrams serves as senior counsel for Rewiring America.

According to an August press release (the day the grant was officially awarded), PFC said the grant would “provide needed capital to transform the marketplace for heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, induction stoves, solar panels, home battery systems, EV chargers, and wiring and weatherization upgrades that support them.”

Zeldin appeared on Fox News’s Jesse Watters Primetime on Thursday night to discuss the situation. Watters asked Zeldin, “Is this a kickback? Is it theft? Is it graft?” Zeldin replied it was all of the above and proceeded to describe the very convoluted path these funds typically follow and how many “salaries” are paid along the way.

It’s a green slush fund. $20 billion parked at an outside bank towards the end of the Biden administration, given to just eight NGOs. … These NGOs were created for the first time, many of them, just to get this money. And they’re pass-throughs. So the EPA entered into this account control agreement with these entities. Treasury enters into a financial agent agreement with the bank, and they design it to tie the EPA’s hands behind their back — to tie the federal government’s hands behind its back.

So when the money goes through the NGOs to subgrantees, many of them also pass-throughs, we don’t know where it’s going. We don’t have the proper amount of oversight. And, as you pointed out, it’s going to people in the Obama and Biden administrations, it’s going to donors. It’s not going directly … to remediate that environmental issue … deliver that clean air, land, and water.

Trump called out Abrams by name during his address to Congress on Tuesday night. He said, “$1.9 billion to recently created Decarbonization of Homes Committee headed up—and we know she’s involved. Just at the last moment, the money was passed over by a woman named Stacey Abrams. Have you ever heard of her?”

During a Thursday night interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, Abrams explained how the funds were spent:

In 2023 and 2024, I led a program called Vitalizing DeSoto. We worked in a tiny town in South Georgia to demonstrate that by replacing energy-inefficient appliances with efficient appliances, you can lower your cost. In fact, we accomplished that. For 75% of the community, they got appliances that are lowering their bills right now. We had one woman who saw her electric bill cut in half—from $180 to $98. That’s what we delivered.

And based on that program, a coalition of organizations, famous organizations, came together and said to the EPA, ‘If we can do this here, we can do this for millions more Americans. Let us invest the money of American in lowering the cost for Americans.’

And the EPA said, ‘Okay, great.’

Some may believe her, but most remain skeptical. The greater concern, however, is that within the vast federal budget, $2 billion is a mere drop in the bucket. If PFC serves as a microcosm of how taxpayer dollars are spent across the government, the true scale of the problem is staggering.

If taxpayer dollars are handled anywhere near as carelessly as suggested by the advisor in the Project Veritas video, it signals a deeper issue of fiscal irresponsibility that should alarm every American.

Perhaps Americans already recognize this, which is why they overwhelmingly support the efforts of the Department of Government Efficiency. It’s also likely why the small percentage who benefit from unchecked government spending are fighting so fiercely to maintain the status quo.


Elizabeth writes commentary for The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation and a member of the Editorial Board at The Sixteenth Council, a London think tank. Please follow Elizabeth on X or LinkedIn.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

These political NGO’s need to be hammered like a Sunday morning pick up and people need to be put away for their financial fraud!!

Getting the money back would be helpful, but until grifters like Abrams are forced to do a perp walk, this is mostly Kabuki theater.

Stacey Abrams, campaigning in North Georgia, finds herself lost and pulls into a roadside general store for directions. A little white-haired granny working the store counter greets her and asks how she can help. Stacey asks, “Can you tell how to get to 283?” Granny replies, “Honey, I’d lay off the vittles some ….”

“Nonprofits, states, tribes, cities.”

Unfortunately, as I have learned, tribes are nothing but another grift under the progressive umbrella.

Of course, native Americans were treated horribly by our ancestors but, as is true in the case of black Americans too, there can be no forgiveness as long as there’s a gravy train in place feeding the fraud.

irishgladiator63 | March 9, 2025 at 12:35 pm

In my state, stealing $200 is punishable by up to five years in prison. But $20 billion we just write off.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to irishgladiator63. | March 9, 2025 at 8:00 pm

    A way must be found to prosecute, give the F ers the J6 treament, is nothing else, bankrupt them.

    The problem is that they didn’t steal $20 Billion. The Biden regime, whoever was running it, just gave it to them. If fraud with the money can be proved then maybe the DOJ can go after them for that but it looks like there were no strings attached to the money so I don’t know what can be done other than to make everyone who got this type of money famous and reform the procedures so it never happens again.

Should have gone to Tunnels to Towers, not another scam where people get rich and the intended beneficiaries get screwed. Because the actual beneficiaries are the scammers.

“Is this a kickback? Is it theft? Is it graft?” Zeldin replied it was all of the above…

These are crimes. These people at USAID, EPA, NGOs, etc. are criminals. Put these people in prison for these crimes, or it’s still just *clown world* where we only gladhand it to perpetual outrage pr0n, so we can own the libs.

PUT. THESE. PEOPLE. IN. PRISON.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to LB1901. | March 9, 2025 at 8:23 pm

    We will need a lot more prison space, and we need to do this cheaply. With that in mind, we should create large areas of space enclosed with razer wire, above and below ground in the middle of a desert. Use RFID to despense food and water. There should not be any buildings, electricity, fire, ect.

    If you think this too exteme, think about J6 and their overall conduct.

    diver64 in reply to LB1901. | March 10, 2025 at 6:18 am

    For what? These NGO’s were obviously engaged in handing out money for every left wing fantasy they could come up with but was it illegal for them to do so? I’m not sure of that. A microscope needs to be brought into their offices though and a thorough audit done. If Brandon gave an NGO or agency like USAID money to advance “justice” and they gave some group $50k for gay swimming lessons and gay swimming lessons were given then I’m not sure that’s fraud. Bad use of the money but unless there is a paper trail of that money going right back to politicians pockets it’s pretty much gone.

Democrats are maintained by theft, graft and money laundering. Vote fraud is the icing on the cake. Three quarters of their Congressional caucus knows it and the other quarter doesn’t want to know it.

      steves59 in reply to tjv1156. | March 9, 2025 at 3:00 pm

      Shut up, you idiot.

      DaveGinOly in reply to tjv1156. | March 9, 2025 at 4:43 pm

      Can’t tell the difference between taxpayer’s money and money that passes in private transactions. Obviously not a tax accountant.

      DaveGinOly in reply to tjv1156. | March 9, 2025 at 5:03 pm

      As I’ve written before here, I’ll vote for a scoundrel who loves his country before I’d vote for a puritan who doesn’t. It’s not a popularity contest, it’s a difference between who will do right by the country and who won’t that decides how I vote. So far, I’m liking what I’m seeing.

      Milhouse in reply to tjv1156. | March 9, 2025 at 8:39 pm

      1. Whom did the foundation defraud?

      2. “Trump University” was indeed a scam, but the essence of that scam, the reason it was a scam, was that Trump had almost no involvement. The scam was that he allowed an outside organization to use his name, and he narrated advertisements for them that deliberately gave the impression that he was personally running the “university”, choosing and training its faculty, planned its curriculum, and was frequently present to meet students personally. The more you claim he was involved, the less of a scam it would be.

      3. Fraud requires a victim; no one was defrauded, so there was no fraud.

        tjv1156 in reply to Milhouse. | March 10, 2025 at 3:13 pm

        You should be one of ‘the moron’s ‘ lawyers. LOL you sound like Roy Cohn- the sleazebag lawyer who alway said his sleazebag clients never did anything wrong-the Government was picking on them. Defending the lying sleazy orange blob is just not a good look. Makes you look ….you guessed it….kinda sleazy yourself.

      ChrisPeters in reply to tjv1156. | March 10, 2025 at 1:28 am

      Seriously, you have made yourself out to be a Trump-obsessed Democrat fool.

        thalesofmiletus in reply to ChrisPeters. | March 10, 2025 at 4:25 pm

        His performance is so on-the-nose that I’d think him a false-flag to make his side look terrible, but we all know that Democrats really are that idiotic and truculent.

      Evil Otto in reply to tjv1156. | March 10, 2025 at 6:30 am

      Notice that this troll has nothing to say about Abrams or any of the other Democrats who have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar. He’s not opposed to government fraud. He just hates Trump.

        tjv1156 in reply to Evil Otto. | March 10, 2025 at 3:15 pm

        I am not defending her . I never liked her. She has not gotten her hand caught in any cookie jar though. Yet.IF she does I will be the first to condemn her.

          Evil Otto in reply to tjv1156. | March 10, 2025 at 8:11 pm

          Not what I said, troll. I said you had nothing to say about her at all. I didn’t ask whether you liked her or not. She has been caught. Her organization, the one that got $2 billion from the Biden administration, previously had $100 in its account. It basically doesn’t exist except as a name, a web page, and a few employees. Nothing there that is worthy of TWO BILLION DOLLARS. Hell, for that matter, what expertise does she bring? Is she an expert in green energy? Recycling?

          And no, you won’t condemn her. You don’t care about any of that. You don’t oppose government waste, fraud, and abuse. You just hate Trump. That’s it. There’s nothing more to you than that.

    tjv1156 in reply to Whitewall. | March 9, 2025 at 4:41 pm

    oh so now you’re AGIANST theft graft and money laundering?

Another fat black female democrat grifter. “Color” me surprised.

This massive scale of theft was the sole purpose for having Biden in the White House. They were doing it the whole time he was (allegedly) president. This sloppiness in the last few weeks just shows us the tip of the iceberg. There will be MUCH more.

Well Elizabeth , you never say. Did she at least buy and give out the appliances or not?

    DaveGinOly in reply to tjv1156. | March 9, 2025 at 4:52 pm

    I’d wager you’re not supportive of an investigation to find out. It would cost too much, like removing illegal aliens, right?

Such a brazen grift by the shiftless, stupid, incompetent and obese daughter of Idi Amin.

henrybowman | March 9, 2025 at 2:27 pm

I wonder how many years of electric bills the townspeople could’ve paid with that $1.9 billion? I haven’t seen an electric bill under $400 in two years, and yet nobody’s sending me government money to upgrade my appliances.

Appliance upgrade to commercial deep-fat fryers, obviously.

    DaveGinOly in reply to tjv1156. | March 9, 2025 at 4:59 pm

    Reposting the same comment, esp. to just stir the pot, is abusive. It will legit get you booted off this site. Then there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth, but we won’t be able to hear any of it.

    Also, I see you’re not a mathematician either. If you were, you would have noticed that all three of your citations don’t amount to but a small fraction of what Abrams likely grifted. And if there’s graft of this scope going on elsewhere in government, there’s far more money involved, and it will condemn an entire party, not just one man (or woman).

    While you’re still talking about millions, we’re already talking about billions. You keep on doing what you’re doing. It’s really working out well for you.

“Vitalizing DeSoto”, if properly implemented for the right reasons, could be a valuable experiment. But I can’t find any detailed information about what was done, for what reasons, and how much it cost.

Here is the main website: https://www.rewiringamerica.org/stories/vitalizing-desoto

I says that Rewiring America supported 74 “household electrification” projects in DeSoto. The projects consisted of providing one of the following items: electric induction stove, heat pump, heat pump water heater.

A rough estimate for the cost of these project can be made by taking a high estimate for the cost of the most expensive item (heat pump, $20K) and multiplying it by 74. One gets $1.48M.

Not only is this one thousandth of the grant, but the project also would not scale to a national project. And the motivation is “meeting our climate goals” by convincing homeowners to use electricity instead of natural gas. I strongly doubt that this saves homeowners money OR helps “the climate”.

This organization needs to be examined under a microscope.

However, I’m very happy for the people who got free stuff!

Earlier reports were that Abrams’ “decarbonization” organization received $2B (President Trump in his Joint Address said it was $1.9B). If each household received, say, $5K in appliance upgrades–that would cover 400,000 homes. Saying, or at least implying, that her project was complete, Abrams said on MSNBC (3/6/25), that they upgraded 75% of homes in “a tiny town in South Georgia.” What town? How many homes are there in that “tiny town”? What do the records of the organization’s expenditures show? Let’s see the books of account.

    DaveGinOly in reply to eb6430. | March 10, 2025 at 1:38 am

    Overall, I believe the damning part is DOE could have just issued rebates (or even doled out the cash directly). This would have had two great advantages to passing it through an NGO:
    1. The money never leaves the government until it goes to the beneficiary
    2. The money’s distribution is overseen by people already on the government payroll, there’s no additional overhead (esp. in the form of salaries) involved in its disbursement

    Of course, the converse of these reasons is exactly why it goes to NGOs.

Abrams left wing jobs project shows how you can spend $10,000 to buy someone a washing machine.

That’s like 2.7 million stoves… Well then, show me the big fat 1.9 billion dollar paper trail and let’s move on. Uh huh, that’s what I thought.