Wisconsin Gov. Evers Wants to Change ‘Mother’ to ‘Inseminated Person’
Image 01 Image 03

Wisconsin Gov. Evers Wants to Change ‘Mother’ to ‘Inseminated Person’

Wisconsin Gov. Evers Wants to Change ‘Mother’ to ‘Inseminated Person’

It’s not “biological” mother or father…it’s “natural parent.”

Wisconsin Democratic Gov. Tony Evers wants the state law to drop “mother” and use “inseminated person” instead.

I. Am. Fuming.

The bill also changes “paternity” to “parentage” and “father” to “parent.”

In cases of surrogacy, “mother” is now “parent” or “person” “who gave birth to the child.”

It’s not “biological” mother or father…it’s “natural parent.”

STOP. ERASING. FEMALES.

It is not just on those pages that cases of artificial insemination are discussed.

The changes are throughout the bill. I understand the changes regarding marriage since same-sex couples can have a legal union.

This bill also erases males.

Only females can carry and birth a human being. Only a male can impregnate the female.

For instance, the section about paternity cases.

Wait. I’m sorry…I mean parentage. Pages 1768, 1769, 1772, and 1773:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

amatuerwrangler | February 22, 2025 at 2:09 pm

These people are stark-raving mad. How do they get this way???

Wonder what Orwell would say to this fool.

Every time I look at this beady eyed little freak I immediately think of an evil Mr. Rogers and that someone should check his basement and hard drives.

Gov Evers is proof that there is a result to anal sex.

Can the people of Wisc. not do something about this clown?

    Milhouse in reply to Whitewall. | February 23, 2025 at 6:24 am

    They seem to like him for some reason, so they don’t want to do anything about him. Other than reelect him in 2026, if he wants a third term.

I wonder if a case could be brought against him or the State for causing psychological damage to “mothers”?

    Milhouse in reply to jb4. | February 23, 2025 at 6:27 am

    First of all no, it would be ridiculously frivolous and anyone who brought such a case would be begging for sanctions.

    Second, even if that weren’t the case, still no, because of free speech, legislative immunity, and about a dozen other reasons.

LibraryGryffon | February 22, 2025 at 2:51 pm

I can’t decide if that sounds like livestock or sexual assault. Either way, gross.

Before you know it, May 11 will be here, and time to send those Inseminated Person greeting cards. Be sure to include a Whitperson’s Sampler.

Do they make “Happy Inseminated” cards for Mothers Day? I am sure Governor Twit’s mother would really delight in her ‘inseminated offspring’ s endearment and thoughtfulness…how about bashing a rolling pin on his head or pouring some identifiable bodily fluid, like urine or sperm, on his clueless noggin?

Besides the stupidest remarks ever made, it’s Cultural Marxism

As my mother would say, “That’s just stupid”.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair | February 22, 2025 at 3:19 pm

Not to be gross … but male homosexuals are inseminated, too. Not to any practical effect, but inseminated, nonetheless.

Leftists are crazy with language and they have no sense and no taste, in addition to their nihilistic insanity.

ThePrimordialOrderedPair | February 22, 2025 at 3:21 pm

On the bright side, they left “Indian” in the bill.

Remember when the Communists were trying to say that we on the right have no respect for women?

I would like to propose a change to the language as well. AP Style guide take note please. From now on wherever you would use “democrat” please use “idiot”. This change shall take effect immediately. Failure to comply will result in much ridicule.

There is tomfuckery going on in Wisconsin politics

I dont believe for a moment he ever won the Governorship, and certainly not re election

Milwaukee and Madison made sure they hold back votes till they see how many they need

Trump had to win by an avalanche just to win by a few thousand

And the SC of Wisconsin has an election in the next few weeks, it will be a disaster to lose another seat to Democrats ( or have one stolen)

The voters are the problem.

Dumb*ssery at its worst.

“Inseminated Person’s Day” just doesn’t have the same ring.

I was wrong! After seeing Evers I know now that there is third sex.

I don’t really mind the term “natural parent” in regards to paternity laws as it takes much more than the sex act to make a man a father or a woman a mother in actual practice. “Inseminated person” is just insulting nonsense. Why not simply use the term “surrogate” or “legal mother” whichever applies?

What really scares me is this shows me the idea that children are commodities is not going away anytime soon.

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to JRaeL. | February 23, 2025 at 9:18 am

    So, how does one differentiate between an inseminated person in the front hole compared to the back hole?

    Perhaps transvestite1156 can explain.

BigRosieGreenbaum | February 22, 2025 at 5:00 pm

Inseminated person is just yuck. My god, now we’re all farm animals.

What’s frightening is that almost half the country voted for this bs. Democrats are a Party of totalitarian fascists implementing a new patriarchy that is eliminating women from existence.

irishgladiator63 | February 22, 2025 at 5:32 pm

So…this Democrat wants women to be defined only in relation to what men do to them… interesting.

Dolce Far Niente | February 22, 2025 at 6:56 pm

“Do you, Inseminated Person, take this Turkey Baster, to have and to hold, from this day forward?”

This sort of kooky wokiesta crap is gonna backfire on the d/prog. It already is in more sane jurisdictions. Even in the upper Midwest there’s gotta be a limit to the willingness of most folks to play along with this crap.

Trapped in Davis | February 22, 2025 at 9:02 pm

If a mother is an “inseminated person”, then a father must now be an “inseminator”. Thus we have the new perjorative “inseminated person inseminator”.

Request denied.

If Democrats are perverting the language this badly, then can’t Indian-Americans start demanding their rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act etc? If fathers are no longer fathers, mothers no longer mothers, then how can Indian retain its archaic exclusive definition?

ThePrimordialOrderedPair | February 23, 2025 at 12:18 am

“Inseminated person”

Actually, the expression was “c*m dumpster” but I was led to understand that that expression was a bit on the tasteless side. Now, it’s legislative language for leftists.

However, it’s still not as bad as that inane “front hole” stuff.

These are truly evil 3 year olds we are dealing with.

AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | February 23, 2025 at 9:26 am

The best part of this inseminated person’s offspring leaked out of its inseminated persons front hole and became a brown stain on the mattress.

Evers is what survived.

AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | February 23, 2025 at 9:34 am

It’s a good thing that the inseminated person who spilled Tony Evers out of its front hole died 15 years ago instead of the shame it would experience with what her offspring is doing.

https://pantagraph.com/news/local/obituaries/jean-gorrow-evers/article_d16fde2a-80b3-11df-8f70-001cc4c002e0.html

Samuel L. Jackson hardest hit.