Image 01 Image 03

Teachers in Minnesota Could Lose Licenses if They Don’t Affirm LGBT Identities

Teachers in Minnesota Could Lose Licenses if They Don’t Affirm LGBT Identities

“The standards appear to require teachers to adopt practices that could violate their constitutional rights.”

Tim Walz is still the governor of Minnesota. Thank your lucky stars he is not about to be sworn in as vice president.

The College Fix reports:

Minnesota may deny licenses if teachers don’t affirm LGBT identities

Current and aspiring teachers will need to ensure they are sufficiently in support of the LGBT agenda in order to have a license to teach in Minnesota under rules set to go into effect this July.

Minnesota’s new “Standards of Effective Practice” require teachers to “[foster] an environment that ensures student identities,” including “sexual orientation,” are “historically and socially contextualized, affirmed, and incorporated into a learning environment where students are empowered to learn and contribute as their whole selves.”

The standards, supported by the state’s Democrat Gov. Tim Walz, have drawn religious liberty concerns from a leading Supreme Court litigation group.

“In general, a state has the broad authority to determine curriculum for its public schools, and teachers typically cannot object to that curriculum,” Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Tyson Langhofer told The College Fix via a media statement. “This means that the state government can tell its public-school teachers to teach the theory of a certain ideology, political idea, or religion.”

Langhofer told The College Fix that the government cannot force teachers to agree with a certain belief or ideology through their speech or conduct.

“Minnesota’s new standards of effective practice for teachers appear to do just that. The standards don’t simply require teachers to teach a certain curriculum,” he said. “The standards appear to require teachers to adopt practices that could violate their constitutional rights.”

Langhofer said First Amendment protections could be used to push back against the standards.

“If teachers are forced to personally endorse ideas they disagree with or participate in teaching practices that violate their religious beliefs, they may be able to challenge these practices by arguing that their right to free exercise is being violated. It all depends on how these new standards are implemented,” he said.

His employer is no stranger to First Amendment and religious liberty lawsuits in the classroom. ADF has successfully defended a professor punished for refusing to use a student’s transgender pronouns, as previously reported by The Fix.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

That would be a religious test. BY DEFINITION.
And it needs to face a lawsuit immediately (not after some more visible harm is done) for “creating a hostile work environment.”

Sue the individuals involved until their wallets bleed.

It all depends on how these new standards are implemented,” he said.
No, actually, it doesn’t. Requiring people to use fantasy pronouns for people is, by definition, a religious requirement. The insanity that is transgenderism is a cult.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.