Biden Administration Continues War on Cigarettes to the Bitter End
Biden’s FDA is pushing regulation lower nicotine levels in cigarettes, which would end up banning most kinds.

The Biden team has conducted several different domestic wars throughout its pathetic administration. Two examples are the War on Appliances and the War on American Energy.
And, unlike its foreign endeavors, these engagements have succeeded…enough to make life more complex and expensive for our citizens.
Biden has been conducting a War on Cigarettes that began early in his administration. At first, menthol cigarettes were in the crosshairs, with a plan to mandate eliminate them from the market. Then, the administration backed off on this proposal after it faced a backlash from Black communities, which are a key market for this type of smoke. That was in April, 2024.
Interestingly, once Biden abandoned the presidential race, the plans for the menthol cigarette ban were back on.
Back in 2022, Team Biden also began moving forward on an ambitious plan to mandate the elimination of nearly all nicotine in cigarettes, a policy that would upend the $95 billion U.S. cigarette industry.
Unlike the menthol cigarette proposal, this measure still appears on the table. Biden’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just announced that the Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Certain Tobacco Products has just completed its regulatory review process.
The standard continues the FDA’s control over cigarettes, which Obama initially established. From Fox News:
“The proposed rule, ‘Tobacco Product Standard for Nicotine Level of Certain Tobacco Products,’ is displaying in the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) ROCIS system as having completed regulatory review on January 3,” an FDA spokesman told Fox Digital.
“As the FDA has previously said, a proposed product standard to establish a maximum nicotine level to reduce the addictiveness of cigarettes and certain other combusted tobacco products, when finalized, is estimated to be among the most impactful population-level actions in the history of U.S. tobacco product regulation. At this time, the FDA cannot provide any further comment until it is published.”
…Former President Barack Obama signed the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act in 2009, which granted the FDA the power to regulate tobacco products.
In the years since, the agency has worked to lower nicotine levels, including in July 2017 under the Trump administration, when then-FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb announced it would seek to require tobacco companies to drastically cut nicotine in cigarettes in an effort to help adult smokers quit.
Experts are already warning about the unintended consequences of these proposed rules. They assert that lowering nicotine levels could lead to increased illegal tobacco trafficking and potentially benefit organized crime.
“Biden’s ban is a gift with a bow and balloons to organized crime cartels with it, whether it’s cartels, Chinese organized crime, or Russian mafia,” Rich Marianos, a former assistant director of the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, told Fox News.
“It’s going to keep America smoking, and it’s going to make the streets more violent,” Marianos said.
The Biden admin is working to effectively ban cigarettes in 11th hour proposal – a former ATF agent says this is a ‘gift’ to organized crime cartels. pic.twitter.com/GoloVHH4L5
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 7, 2025
There aren’t any imminent changes to nicotine level rules. The rule-making process is going to continue through the Trump administration, and it is not known what type of reception it will receive from the new team.
However, the virtue-signalling bureaucrats warn they will continue to push for these rules that they assure us will significantly impact the nation’s smoking habits.
The Office of Management and Budget’s approval process can take months. There will also be a public comment period, and the tobacco industry often sues the government to stop new regulations.
It’s also unclear what the FDA will do with such a proposal under President-elect Donald Trump. During his first term, the agency signaled that it wanted to limit nicotine, but the tobacco industry donated heavily to Republicans ahead of this year’s elections, and Trump’s pick for chief of staff worked as a tobacco lobbyist.
Robertson says her association wants this last-minute FDA effort to work.
“We’re hopeful, but we’ll be there if it doesn’t move forward, and we’ll continue to be there,” she said.
Hopefully, this time, Trump will be able to smoke out the Deep Staters before we start suffering even more unintended but foreseeable consequences from over-reaching regulations.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Lowering nicotine levels just requires addicts to smoke more cigarettes.
Watch Amtrak railcams at smoke break stations (#5 at Galesburg, #3 at Ft Madison, for example) to see how urgent smoking is to how many people.
Any bets on the tobacco lobby being in back of this move? What’s nicotine means more cigarettes which means more sales.
They can just smoke two at once or roll their own.
I do not smoke, dip, chew, or vape,
so personally I do not care. However
it is not the place of the federal
govt to be mommy or daddy …
it is the individuals responsibilities
to inform themselves and take care of themselves and accept the consequences of their behavior.
for good or ill.
I agree but feel similar for weed. Additionally though legalized drug vices can’t be an excuse to live off the govt dime.
Cigarettes killed most of my contemporaries’ parents along with my parents, and far too soon. In that generation, cigarettes were glamorized and even advertised as “healthy.”
Much like a clock, slo joe gets something right once in a blue moon. A miracle.
I have no sympathy for this industry. If only we could have had more time with our beloved parents.
Today tobacco/nicotine, tomorrow sugar or saturated fat or alcohol or any other substance that TPTB deem “unhealthy” for you. I don’t smoke, never have, but this is pure nanny state crap.
C.S. Lewis was precisely correct:
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.
It’s liberatarian question—
c’mon – everyone KNEW it was bad for them, and they chose to do it anyone.
I support that choice.
I also support higher health insurance premiums for tobacco usage because I don’t want to pay for that choice.
anyone—anyway…
I know how to proof read, but I choose to do it after I hit submit.
Millions of people have quit if they want to. I have no sympathy for anyone asking Big Government to run their lives for them.
I don’t know what to think on this one… I don’t think there is any argument a out nicotine being addictive, and I don’t know of any evidence that says that cigarettes are not harmful to health.
I don’t like the idea of government intervention in the marketplace, but this is not a libertarian country, and this seems like a stupid place to make a stand on that subject.
“In 2022, 49.2 million (19.8%)—or nearly 1 in 5—U.S. adults reported current tobacco product use.”
That’s a lot of smokes sold in a year and a lot of voters. But how many of them will vote on the issue?
I DO know what to think on this one: Biden and his Marxist handlers have no right to do this.
I do not smoke, and I never have, but I know this sort of government overreach must stop.
In other news, menthol fentanyl still perfectly OK.
additionally
both my parents smoked
3 packs per day … it killed both
of them.
mom had 2 heart attacks and a stoke that took her in 1991
dad died in inches .. Emphysema
had some kind of bubbler and if
he left the house he had a O2 pony tank.
he died in 1999
But nicotine is not the thing making them addictive.
I smoked cigars for decades and quit in the last 36 months as I can no longer afford it
No symptoms, no nothing, no recidivism.
The chem package in cigarettes is a sophisticated, highly engineered package harder to kick than opiods
So I oppose this phony window-dressing fraud of a solution and the most corrupt cabal in American history trying to pull it off….
During my spring break of 1972, I remember seeing $2.00 cartons (yes, ten packs) for sale at gas stations on my way to Florida.
You are an anecdote not a statistical probability.
Nicotine, by itself, is mildly addictive. Cigarette smoke is VERY addictive.
Speaking as a former two pack a day–unfiltered king size– smoker who had one he’ll of a time quitting. 50 plus years ago. And a current user of Nicotine pouches. The “addiction ” to the pouches is similar to my two cup a day coffee habit.
I don’t use the pouches due to any addiction. I think it helps my geriatric brain work a bit better. (If I can remember to take them)
No sir, I’m a curmudgeon. Now get off my lawn!
I know of several others…
YMMV…
Nicotine as is does not cross the blood brain barrier. So the tobacco companies add ammonia to the mixture, crosses the blood brain barrier and is very addictive.. Note that the only thing free to soldiers in the world wars was tobacco. They knew that on coming home the fix was in.
I am curious, what impact, if any, of overruling Chevon will have on this proposal.
The Congress is the proper entity to make this change, and not a crazy dictator.
Chevron is only relevant to interpreting ambiguous statutes. If the statute this is relying on is clear then Chevron is irrelevant.
This has to be one of the dumbest things I’ve seen. You’re not going to get people to quit smoking by reducing the nicotine content of cigarettes. In fact, that will have the opposite effect because now they’ll have to smoke MORE cigarettes to get their fix, not less.
I say this as someone who smoked for quite a long time before I quit and it was hard, so I have a lot of sympathy for the people who try to quit and fail.
Yes, nicotine is a poison as is alcohol. Short of completely outlawing the things, which would only create a black market, they can’t control behavior. They can influence it by making it stupidly expensive which they already did years ago and it’s why I quit which was about the time the things broke $2 per pack.
remember k-12 kids.
Tobacco is bad and harmful, but sex changes are completely safe and a normal part of growing up (just like putting braces on your teeth).
Tobacco is bad and harmful, but sex changes are completely safe and a normal part of growing up (just like putting braces on your teeth).
All true but you forgot to mention that smoking pot is completely fine, and in fact good for your health.
Well …. have Democrats ever had a developing brain to be harmed by marijuana?
Smoking pot is bad for your health.
I apply this concept to proposed legislation/regulation: Just because it’s a good, even great, idea, that doesn’t mean it should become Federal Law.
Exactly my attitude towards seat belt laws. Great idea wearing seat belts, but I sure don’t want the government coercing me to buckle up. That logic could apply to an endless number of things that are “good for you”: mandated flossing, exercise, use of sunscreen, eating this but not that…. just use your imagination and you’ll see how overbearing things could quickly become.
And don’t dismiss the idea with “Oh, it could never happen here” – as soon as you say that, the government says “Hold my beer.” The past few years have demonstrated that.
Here is an idea, stop subsidizing tobacco. Or be honest and just outright ban cigarettes.
I do not smoke but I used to, a long time ago. Quitting is very unpleasant but withdrawal will go away, eventually.
“Let me just say this, about that”, as someone once said… What is sold as tobacco is about far removed from the actual product as you can get and still have something that will burn.
Pure tobacco has a very lovely smell and mild flavor. You cannot purchase pure tobacco where it is grown. Instead, at least when I was hand rolling very fine quality cigarettes, the tobacco was sent to the England, processed, packaged and then imported into the US and other countries.
A real handmade cigarette does not have that hideous stream of stink wafting from it, just to keep it lit. If you set a pure tobacco cigarette on an ashtray it will just go out. It takes about 10 minutes to smoke a well rolled cigarette though I found it handy enough to smoke one for a few minutes, wait for it to go out and then put the remainder back in the tobacco tin for later consumption.
Three Castles was my favorite brand and it was loved around the world for its purity and quality–made only from the finest Virginia tobacco..
When regulations became too great a burden the company simply ceased exporting to countries who inhibited the trade. Can’t say if they are still in existence in the U.K. anymore, or not.
Even it were available, I no longer have any desire, whatsoever, to smoke anything short of salmon, various portions of proquines, hamburgers, turkeys and such delightful table fare.
If smokers till want to smoke, let them cultivate their own tobacco and become proficient as they may for personal consumption.
The best hand rolling papers I ever used are ZigZag, truly a premium product and easy to work with.
Pure tobacco has a very lovely smell and mild flavor.
Is that related to why pipe smoke smells so much better than cigar/ cigarette smoke? Cigarette smoke smells bad, but cigar smoke is just plain horrible.
Nicotine, by itself, is mildly addictive. Cigarette smoke is VERY addictive.
Speaking as a former two pack a day–unfiltered king size– smoker who had one he’ll of a time quitting. 50 plus years ago. And a current user of Nicotine pouches. The “addiction ” to the pouches is similar to my two cup a day coffee habit.
I don’t use the pouches due to any addiction. I think it helps my geriatric brain work a bit better. (If I can remember to take them)