Image 01 Image 03

TSA Facial Recognition Scanning Spreading, Part of Planned ‘Across The Board’ Biometric Future

TSA Facial Recognition Scanning Spreading, Part of Planned ‘Across The Board’ Biometric Future

“If that happens, this program could become one of the largest federal surveillance databases overnight without authorization from Congress,” said a bipartisan group of Senators in a letter to the DHS Inspector General.

I don’t fly that much, but I did notice in the last few months that when approaching the TSA agent checking i.d. the request was not just for your i.d. The agent asked me to step in front of a screen which took some sort of image. It wasn’t an ‘order’ but it wasn’t a request, it was just taken as matter of fact, part of the routine.

I hadn’t noticed it in the past. But with a lot of other travel worries on my mind, I thought it odd, but didn’t really think about it much at all.

Apparently you can opt-out of the scan, but that wasn’t presented as an option. Reportedly the scanners have a disclosure of the option to opt-out, but I didn’t see it (I also didn’t look for it).

TSA also is promoting the voluntary use of facial recognition to speed check-in:

A new program allows travelers to use their faces for identity verification at the security checkpoint—no driver’s license required. Situated at nine airports across the country, it’s often faster than other lines, and often the shortest.

Travelers flying Delta and United can already use the facial-recognition technology at eligible airports, while those flying American and Alaska should expect to see the option in the coming months, Transportation Security Administration officials say.

While some people express reservations about widespread use of biometrics, travelers on web forums across the internet joke that TSA PreCheck Touchless ID is the veteran flier’s best-kept secret.

“The first rule about Touchless PreCheck is you don’t talk about Touchless PreCheck,” one traveler wrote on Reddit.

Touchless ID allows eligible travelers to get past the security officer in an average of six to eight seconds, compared with 18 to 20 seconds for standard PreCheck screenings, TSA says. The program has read six million faces in its few years of operation.

Crowd facial recognition is growing around the world, with China the leader in using it for social control:

China’s facial recognition system logs nearly every single citizen in the country, with a vast network of cameras across the country. A database leak in 2019 gave a glimpse of how pervasive China’s surveillance tools are — with more than 6.8 million records from a single day, taken from cameras positioned around hotels, parks, tourism spots and mosques, logging details on people as young as 9 days old….

China’s aggressive development and use of facial recognition offers a window into how a technology that can be both benign and beneficial — think your iPhone’s Face ID — can also be twisted to enable a crackdown on actions that the average person may not even consider a crime. Chinese officials have used surveillance tools to publicly shame people wearing sleepwear in public, calling it “uncivilized behavior.”

The punishing of these minor offenses is by design, surveillance experts said. The threat of public humiliation through facial recognition helps Chinese officials direct over a billion people toward what it considers acceptable behavior, from what you wear to how you cross the street.

“The idea is that the authorities are trying to put in place comprehensive surveillance and behavioral engineering on a mass scale,” said Maya Wang, a senior researcher on China at the Human Rights Watch. “The authorities want to create a kind of society that would be very easy for them to manage.”

China used facial recognition for control during COVID:

A Chinese company says it has developed the country’s first facial recognition technology that can identify people when they are wearing a mask, as most are these days because of the coronavirus, and help in the fight against the disease.

China employs some of the world’s most sophisticated systems of electronic surveillance, including facial recognition.

There are no clear guidelines for TSA use of the scans it it taking, accorging to a letter from Senators sent in late November to the Inspector General of Homeland Security:

We urge you to conduct thorough oversight of the Transportation Security Administration’s (“TSA”) use of facial recognition technology for passenger verification from both an authorities and privacy perspective. This technology will soon be in use at hundreds of major and mid-size airports without an independent evaluation of the technology’s precision or an audit of whether there are sufficient safeguards in place to protect passenger privacy.

TSA reportedly plans to introduce next-generation credential authentication technology (CAT) equipped with facial recognition at over 430 airports nationwide.1 Yet the agency already deploys non-facial recognition devices, known as CAT-1 scanners, which are capable of determining if identification documents are fraudulent. TSA has not provided Congress with evidence that facial recognition technology is necessary to catch fraudulent documents, decrease wait times at security checkpoints, or stop terrorists from boarding airplanes….

While the TSA claims facial recognition is optional, it is confusing and intimidating to opt out of TSA’s facial recognition scans, and our offices have received numerous anecdotal reports of Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) becoming belligerent when a traveler asks to opt out, or simply being unaware of that right. Signage directing passengers to follow officer instructions and step in front of the facial recognition camera is prominently displayed, while the signage for opting out is often strategically placed in inconspicuous locations, making it challenging to read and locate. TSOs are inconsistently trained on how to respond to passengers who request to opt out and have told passengers they will face delays for opting out.4

Additionally, despite promising lawmakers and the public that this technology is not mandatory, TSA has stated its intent to expand this technology beyond the security checkpoint and make it mandatory in the future. In April 2023, TSA Administrator Pekoske admitted at the South by Southwest Conference that “we will get to the point where we will require biometrics across the board.” 5 If that happens, this program could become one of the largest federal surveillance databases overnight without authorization from Congress.

There are several hundred (maybe more) photos of me on ‘the internet’ from media and other appearances. My phone scans my face for access to some apps and websites, which lurks out there somewhere in the cloud. And when I got my license, the i.d. I generally use, my face is on it and in a state computer system.

So I hardly consider my face ‘private’ in any meaningful way. And I might even join one of those facial recognition fast-flyer programs if given more information and understanding of how it will be used.

But for some reason having TSA run that facial scan as a matter of routine and without clear and obvious disclosure that I could opt-out bothered me. A multi-dimensional facial scan is not the same as a Facebook photo. The government taking and using my digital image for facial recognition purposes without clear limitations is worrisome.

It is not at all far-fetched to imagine the federal government implementing wide-ranging facial recognition technology not just for people boarding an airplane, but also for other restrictive purposes during a ‘national emergency’ like took place during COVID.

Or worse, to identify behavior (e.g., standing on the Capitol lawn during a protest?) and using that to restrict access to travel and other services, such as banking, as happened in Canada during the truckers’ strike.

===============

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:
, ,

Comments

Bog brother is here
Guess will have to buy one of those super masks, like Biden’s double


 
 0 
 
 11
TrickyRicky | December 29, 2024 at 8:53 pm

No. Hell no. Simply look at the examples cited. Total social control in China and the debanking of truckers in Canada.

HELL NO

I always smile when going through a highway toll plaza. The surveillance state know where I am and where I have been.

Real-time AI analysis of ubiquitous surveillance data is coming, if not here already.

I feel much safer.

Watch the “Person of Interest” series on Amazon Prime. It is entertaining and prophetic.

nope.

Remember after 9/11 they couldn’t put any emphasis on profiling middle eastern men… despite the shoe bomber and few other episodes.

TSA is not about safety and making air travel a hard target…. it’s about social programming.

Why do I need to look at a camera? Points of entry already scan such documents as drivers licenses and passports. This happened with my wife and me when we traveled to the UK a couple of years ago. If that’s not sufficient, we can drive where we want to go.
.


 
 0 
 
 1
Recargador1 | December 30, 2024 at 7:06 am

I flew out on December 6th and came home December 8th. TSA took my picture at both airports…. I don’t remember being asked if I wanted to “opt out”…


 
 0 
 
 7
E Howard Hunt | December 30, 2024 at 7:55 am

Airport security would be greatly enhanced by the heavy use of evidence-based profiling employed by a far fewer number of better trained officers. It would cost a fraction of the current budget. It is indeed ironic that the screaming liberals who denounced profiling in the name of egalitarianism are now the ones screaming about the mass surveillance technologies which are necessary to effectuate the dystopian nightmare they insisted upon.


 
 0 
 
 7
CommoChief | December 30, 2024 at 8:14 am

Bureaucrats naturally drift into authoritarianism. The institutions have X mission. The folks staffing the Agencies want to make it easy to perform their mission. They start expanding their reach to encompass all sorts of ways to accomplish it, many of which are anti liberty.

Catching criminals would be easier if LEO could conduct warrantless searches but that’s not constitutional… Wait what about:
1. Financial regs requiring your institution to spy on your transactions and report them to the gov’t?
2. Facial recognition software becoming ubiquitous.
3. Cameras in public places.
4. Geo location on cell phones which telecom hands over.
5. Powerful CPU and AI to assist in comparing

This doesn’t touch on banks, financial institutions voluntarily handing over your transaction data to the gov’t. Nor financial institutions ‘debanking’ disfavored businesses and individuals, often with the approval of the gov’t if not at the outright gov’t request.

Add CBDC to this mix and we can see how easy it would be for gov’t to behave in very anti liberty manner to disfavored individuals. Then consider the recent ‘hack’ of cell phone data by what we are told were Chinese hackers was those hackers using the same ‘back door’ the Gov’t demanded be installed so our Govt could listen into conversations and grab data without going through the potential delay on rejection of a warrant. Then add the the many examples of Gov’t employees and contractors accessing data without authorization from their own supervisors, just out of curiosity.

IMO, the solution is to upend the current paradigm by requiring all consumer data to remain the sole property of the individual consumer/business. The bank, financial firm or tech platform is merely a custodian without any authority to collect, retain, sell, gift or transfer the data without specific permission of the user for each instance. The Gov’t can try to get a valid warrant narrowly describing the data they want to see.


 
 0 
 
 0
SeiteiSouther | December 30, 2024 at 10:12 am

I stopped flying when they started doing the full body scans. I’d rather drive to get to my destination than fly.

Omg! What am I going to do with those extra 12 seconds the invasion of my privacy bought?


     
     0 
     
     0
    The_Mew_Cat in reply to Eagle1. | December 30, 2024 at 5:33 pm

    That is an extra 12 seconds of movement for the 100 people in front you in the line too, and if the lines are long it adds up pretty quickly – a line of 100 people moves 20 minutes faster.

To Cat…
And locking you down into your house (and everyone else likewise) would protect us all from murders, theft, Covid, insults, and a myriad other “threats” to our safety … for our own good.

But it wouldn’t be Freedom of any sort.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.