Biden Demands Gun Control After School Shooting But Pardoned Hunter for Gun Crimes
You don’t get to scream for gun control after you pardoned your son for gun crimes.
President Joe Biden demanded gun control after a shooter killed four people at a Christian school in Madison, WI.
Mark Hemingway had the perfect response:
HE LITERALLY JUST PARDONED HIS SON FOR GUN CRIMES! https://t.co/IpGvieaSAI
— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) December 16, 2024
You don’t get to scream for gun control after you pardoned your son for gun crimes.
Biden said:
My administration has taken aggressive action to combat the gun violence epidemic. We passed the most significant gun safety legislation in nearly 30 years, I have taken more executive action to reduce gun violence than any other President in history, and I created the first-ever White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention. But more is needed. Congress must pass commonsense gun safety laws: Universal background checks. A national red flag law. A ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
You pardoned your son. The juvenile suspect used a handgun. Schools are gun free zones. The juvenile could not legally own the gun.
The killer was a prohibited possessor in a g*n free zone and used a hand g*n.
None of this would apply. https://t.co/dRGQVKh6DH— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) December 16, 2024
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
“You don’t get to scream for gun control after you pardoned your son for gun crimes.”
LOL. Of course you do.
You can also scream gun control while your DA’s ignore lots of gun charges that could put eventual murderers in prison before they get around to actually committing murder.
But remember as long as there is still the possibility of non-government ownership of guns the left doesn’t believe they have “gun control”. They want more gun control before they start actually mass enforcing it, primarily on Republicans.
Lefties know what they want,
https://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/148444/80458529.jpg
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/62/80/fb/6280fb7f37edc14b1376c5b71306ca76.jpg
They can try to make the case….but it just got much more difficult. By issuing a pardon for basic offenses in illegally acquiring a firearm he has removed any vestiges of ‘high ground’ for supporting basic firearms regulation. Tough to make the case for ‘common sense’ gun control when the US Attorneys won’t aggressively prosecute violations and where the Executive hands out pardons to the few they reluctantly prosecute.
The only word the pedophile needs to hear in answer is no
7,000 Americans die on an average day. Some of them might have been children, say in traffic accidents. Car control is not mentioned, no soap opera story.
So the Federal Gun Control Act of 1968 isn’t operational in WI? A teen can’t buy any firearm until 18 for long guns and 21 for the handgun used. IOW a prohibited person and background checks don’t apply. Restrictions/bans on semi-automatic rifles and standard capacity magazines won’t stop handguns being used. And a person who can’t buy or legally possess the firearm used won’t be bothered by any “red flag law” passed anywhere in the country.
Same old Same old from the gun grabbers. They want what they want and logic has nothing to do with their gun grabbing. They can’t disarm the population by tailoring their demands to the situation.
By the way, the shooter is a 15 yo female student whom I won’t name.
The guns not the issue here it never is. It’s always some clown that can’t deal with what the rest of us deal with
She was 17
15 according to the most recent reports I’ve read.
No, she was 15, as Edward said. And she was NOT trans. Just generally crazy.
“can’t buy … [until] 21 for the handgun”
An 18 year old can’t purchase from an FFL. It’s entirely lawful for an 18 year old to purchase from a private party. That’s how I purchased my first pistol.
I forgot about some private sales and you are correct. With restrictions varying from state to state, it is Federally legal depending on state statute.
Come and take it you stupid fu*king retard.
Joe Biden can kiss my parkerized metal ass.
Wow, it took almost 5 hours for the calls for Gun Control, they are slipping on their game.
Yeah, they got hypnotized by Luigi.
The two button meme.
Liberal must choose between
1. School shootings mean we need more gun control.
2. Heroes like Luigi need guns to shoot CEOs.
Also why doe Biden look like he is filling his diaper in that photo?
I think it’s become difficult for the
newspropaganda media’s photographers to catch Biden at a time when he is not filling his diaper.Whether it is a scalpel, a gun, an SUV, or something else, the problem stems from liberals entertaining, celebrating abortive ideation under the Pro-Choice religion in progressive sects that socially justify ethical relief of “burdens” h/t Obama through homicidal affirmative action.
If Hunter didn’t pay his federal tax, that means he didn’t pay his state(s) tax. Why isn’t he being criminally prosecuted for that? The Governor(s) can always pardon him.
That depends which state the income was earned in, and whether that state has an income tax.
California for one. Virginia for another.
Was the income earned in those states? Was it taxable in those states?
California tax law is clear that if you reside in the state, all income is taxable by California regardless of where it was earned.
And? Did Hunter legally reside in California during those two years?
Multiple taxing states most likely and income would be apportioned.
Democrat AG’s don’t prosecute Bidens, unless it is for the purpose of making sure they do not get worse than a slap on the wrist.
Those states mayn’t know Mum, but they will keep her.
Must ban those high capacity assault handguns with the shoulder thing that goes up…..is Matlock on now?….
I will say that stiffer penalties for either negligent entrustment, or, negligence, generally (if the weapon wasn’t directly provided to the juvenile) need to be imposed. Juveniles should not be able to get their hands on firearms, if the adult in the household follows basic and common sense storage security rules. There should be stiff penalties imposed for adults who either intentionally or negligently allow juveniles to procure and criminally use firearms.
Intentionally? If you mean they deliberately provided a firearm with full knowledge that the person would use it unlawfully that would make them an accessory to crimes committed. So it’s already covered.
Negligently? Presumably you mean a situation where the firearm wasn’t secured. The same logic would compel locking up all sorts of things that can be used to to har.m;
1. kitchen knives
2. all tools
3. all household chemicals
4. All over the counter medication
5. All RX medications
Anything and everything can be used as weapon to injure or kill with a little bit of ingenuity. The blame for acts of violence rests entirely on the person who chooses to initiate violence not the tool they use nor on anyone else.
I would haggle over only one possibility: they know the juvenile is wack, but leave those things unsecured. THAT could make it negligent or reckless.
Not until there is a societal shift to accommodate involuntary commitment and greater access to mental health care for dangerous individuals. If someone is well enough to not be in a facility or monitored in a half way house then they don’t need extra precautions. If society won’t make the effort to make it easier for troubled folks to get care then society shouldn’t shift blame, IMO.
Yeah. Only really, really stupid, criminal adults leave dangerous weapons unsecured in places here the unauthorized can access them… like Afghanistan.
Well, a juvenile could theoretically use a knife to inflict mass casualties, but, let’s acknowledge the basic principle that a pistol or a rifle is more dangerous in terms of lethality, than a knife, for the purposes of harming multiple victims. I don’t think that should be a controversial principle. And, given the inherent mental/emotional/hormonal instabilities of teens, generally, I think there should be stiff penalties for adult firearms owners who, through negligent storage, allow teens to have unsupervised access to firearms.
How about driving an automobile through a parade? How about poisoning the punch at a school function? How about using ammonia and bleach as a chemical attack in an enclosed area? All could create mass casualties.
The common denominator is an individual determined to do violence to others. It isn’t the particular tool used. You keep ignoring this in your quest to create a stigma around firearms and demand penalties related to storage/access for them but not other dangerous tools that could also be misused.
The perpetrator is to blame. No one else.
“let’s acknowledge the basic principle that a pistol or a rifle is more dangerous in terms of lethality, than a knife, for the purposes of harming multiple victims. I don’t think that should be a controversial”
Yup, that’s liberal “common sense.” Meaning that it’s dead wrong.
When I started out collecting data as a 2A activist in the late ’80s, the largest mass murder on US soil was the Happyland Social Club fire, an arsonist with a jar of gasoline.
Then came Waco.
Then came OKC.
Then came 9/11.
Then came COVID (much less qualifiable, but clearly the record-holder).
In a country with 250 years of history, all this escalation in just 30 years. My God.
Most people never consider that NONE of these mass murders were committed with guns.
Ranting of an irrelevant demented old fool.
Well, duh.
It’s good to be king.
The first time I shot a rifle was at the local high school’s shooting range.
How things have changed over the years.
Breaking: “Biden: ‘I pardoned Hunter? Huh. When did I do that?'”
Because Biden is a stupid douchebag.
Joe doesn’t even know this statement was put out in his name