Image 01 Image 03

New York Times Tech Staffers Strike Before Election Day

New York Times Tech Staffers Strike Before Election Day

One staffer: “Today I’m supposed to be in the NYT newsroom putting the finishing touches on a system pushing live election updates to your phone. But NYT management refuses to give us the same just cause protection our NewsGuild peers have so @NYTGuildTech is on strike.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl_v0yaPGyU&t=3s

This morning, the New York Times tech staff, which includes software developers and data analysts, went on strike.

The strike could affect the paper’s coverage of Election Day:

The two sides negotiated until late Sunday. The sticking points in recent days were over whether they could get a “just cause” provision in their contract, which means workers can be terminated only for misconduct or another such reason; pay increases and pay equity; and return-to-office policies.

Times management said in an email to workers on Sunday that it had offered a 2.5 percent annual wage increase, a minimum 5 percent pay increase for promotions and a $1,000 ratification bonus. It also said that the company would maintain its current in-office work requirements of two days a week through June 2025, while allowing employees to work fully remotely for three weeks per year.

The protests started at 9 AM ET.

“They have left us no choice but to demonstrate the power of our labor on the picket line,” Kathy Zhang, the guild’s unit chair, announced. “Nevertheless, we stand ready to bargain and get this contract across the finish line.”

“We are disappointed that the Tech Guild leadership is attempting to jeopardize our journalistic mission at this critical time,” said Hannah Yang, the NY Times’ chief growth and customer officer, and Jason Sobel, the chief technology officer.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

So….what? They don’t want to post election results? Weird.

    henrybowman in reply to Virginia42. | November 4, 2024 at 3:45 pm

    I once took over a lease on a business premises that was previously a pet shop (qua illegal apartment conversion), from which its hippie proprietor was being evicted for nonpayment. Disgustingly filthy and smelly, flying animal crap on the walls and floors. When the hippie realized too late that the owner was serious about the eviction, he had nowhere to unload his livestock, including over 100 fancy rats (pets or snake food, whichever you needed). So he just let the rats go loose into the neighborhood. For the first couple weeks, they would come back into their old home, looking for food and water, crapping all over my equipment and chewing my cartons. I finally had enough, so I bought a bucket of poison bait blocks and began laying them around the various rooms. I was astounded when I entered one room (where I discovered the hole to the outside was) and the little mice began approaching me, standing up on their hind legs, practically lining up, begging, “give me one of those!” With each block I handed out, they fought each other over who would get to take the poison home with them. It was like the French Revolution had come to Disneyland.

    Anyway, I recount this reminiscence because after reading this story about the commies eating each other at the NY Times, I was immediately reminded me of this quaint animal behavior.

    Ghostrider in reply to Virginia42. | November 4, 2024 at 5:44 pm

    That’s the plan, right? The election results must be postponed until the NYT strike is resolved. More time to add provisional and absentee harvested ballots.

destroycommunism | November 4, 2024 at 9:58 am

Like I have been saying for some time now

what happens when the msm CHOOSES what news to tell us
well they already do that

so the next step
how about when they decide to say ,,as an example,,biden won when in fact he didnt

happened with dewey vs truman

and now we have a wayyyy more aggressive partisan left wing media who knows that especially in this day and age where they have lost power to
social media

they have to stand out and make a difference to satisfy their egos

I mean bragging to your friends that you helped fix the election or withheld info or gave false info
“for the cause” is high status

John Galt appears in a Pierre Delecto manner.

I’m trying hard, with unsure results, to care.
.

destroycommunism | November 4, 2024 at 10:37 am

this is how cnn (nyt kid sista) describes the whole election:

This election has been a tale of unexpected events, featuring a convicted felon who survived two assassination attempts,

an aging president who ditched his bid for a second term a few months before Election Day,

and a vice president handed an 11th hour mission to save the White House from a rival who Democrats see as a wannabe tyrant.

people still read the NY slimes..
who knew …

UnCivilServant | November 4, 2024 at 11:34 am

Shutter the whole paper and lay them all off, alongside the ‘journalists’

    JackinSilverSpring in reply to UnCivilServant. | November 4, 2024 at 12:55 pm

    Better: Izvestia on the Hudson.

    Like Reagan did when the air traffic controllers went on their illegal strike. Ronnie brought in military ATCs and the system didn’t even hiccup.

    And then he fired every one of the strikers for breaking their no-strike contracts. I remember seeing a photo of their union president with a totally puzzled look on his face, obviously wondering “what just happened?” Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy.

It’s too bad it was only the Tech Guild.
If it had been a general strike, emptying the building, it would be our turn to debate in serious tones, “It would be OK because you know they have fire insurance.”

So does this mean the NYT won’t be able to report on the election very well? Will those seeking news be forced to go elsewhere e.g. Fox, Newsmax, or well (frankly I’ve no idea)?

If so kudos to these NYT staff. Stick it to the NYT. Let real news companies handle the election news! 🙂

I suspect this isn’t about labor at all. This is about preventing the problem we saw several times in 2020 where live results were altered in Biden’s favor. Hundreds of thousands of votes disappeared from Trump’s ledger and were added to Biden’s. This way they can just give you the final total as fait accompli.