Image 01 Image 03

Leftist Women’s Psychiatric Break Over Trump Leads to “MATGA” Movement Targeting Men with Poison

Leftist Women’s Psychiatric Break Over Trump Leads to “MATGA” Movement Targeting Men with Poison

“Make Aqua Tofana Great Again,” is TikTok movement featuring, a 17th-century poison used by women to kill abusive men. In turn, men are concerned about the online threats.

Before the first votes were cast, Professor Jacobson predicted there would be a psychiatric break among leftists, especially young women, if President Donald Trump prevailed in the election.

I’ve said this many times on Twitter (X) that we’re going to see a psychiatric break. We’re going to see a psychiatric break on the left, particularly among younger women, based on their behavior so far—something we may never have seen before.

His prediction was more like prophesy.

But for woke leftist women in the aftermath of Donald Trump’s sweeping victory on Tuesday, it was a day of mourning, a day to cry tears in their beers, a day to issue ominous warnings about imminent doom, a day to urge their fellow sistahs to go on a sex strike, and a day to reveal their inner urge to commit violence and murder upon the opposite sex.

A new movement has sprung from this lunacy: Make Aqua Tofana Great Again (MATGA).

The “Make Aqua Tofana Great Again,” or MATGA, movement is a recent online trend in which some women humorously advocate for “reviving” Aqua Tofana—a 17th-century poison used by women to kill and escape their abusive husbands.

Aqua Tofana, named after its alleged creator Giulia Tofana, was a deadly, undetectable poison used across Italy, gaining notoriety for its stealth and potency.

The MATGA trend has become synonymous with Tofana, seemingly emerging as a satirical expression of frustration over certain political issues, mainly targeting Trump and men who support conservative policies that affect women.

The trouble is, when you watch the video clips, it is quite easy to believe that some women might actually start brewing the combination of lead, arsenic, and belladonna, which are thought to be key components of this mixture.

At a time when a leftist man kills his entire family because Trump won the election, the psychological damage done to this nation from Tik Tok, the mainstream media messaging, and the Democratic hate campaign cannot be overstated.

In the interest of protecting innocent men and hopefully getting some women to walk away from the needless hate brewing in their souls, I will share my knowledge as a chemical safety expert and provide some facts that may be helpful.

Aqua Tofana is colorless, odorless, and tasteless, making it easy to slip into food or drinks undetected. It was reportedly quite potent, with just a few drops being enough to kill a person.

Some symptoms arise, as the poison was apparently given in a series of doses. Aqua Tofana was designed to mimic the symptoms of a natural illness: The first dose caused cold-like symptoms; the second dose led to stomach aches, vomiting, and diarrhea; and, the third or fourth dose would be fatal.

Unlike in medieval days, we have the toxicological tools to detect the components.

  • Lead can be detected through blood or urine samples.
  • For arsenic, blood, urine, as well as hair and nail samples can be used.
  • Belladonna poisoning, which is primarily due to its content of atropine and other tropane alkaloids, can be detected through blood or urine tests for atropine and its metabolites.

If you brew Aqua Tofana and use it, you will be discovered.

Now, our elite media may assert this is dark humor. And I sure hope it is. But given what happened with the FEMA crews ignoring the homes of Trump voters and the incidents of violence against Trump supporters, I am not taking any chances.

And it turns out men are taking it seriously, too.

Some men appear to be taking it seriously, with one advising fellow conservatives to “keep your head on a swivel”. Another writes: “Wives are threatening to poison their husbands. Waitresses are threatening to poison their conservative customers.”

Asked about the trend, the FBI said that it encouraged members of the public to report threats of physical violence to local law enforcement. “The FBI investigates federal crimes and threats to the national security,” a spokesperson said. “We will never open an investigation based solely on First Amendment-protected activity.”

My advice to any woman who jumped on the MATGA train: Delete your videos, head to church, make an appointment with a mental health professional, and get your news from some other sources.

The life you save may be your own.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 11
thalesofmiletus | November 13, 2024 at 9:13 am

Seems like encouraging people to poison each other would be a violation of social media TOS, but maybe it’s (D)ifferent.


     
     0 
     
     7
    mailman in reply to thalesofmiletus. | November 13, 2024 at 9:17 am

    Would also seem to be breaking any number of state and federal laws that a newly taken over DoJ may be very interested in follow up on?


       
       0 
       
       0
      Milhouse in reply to mailman. | November 13, 2024 at 5:35 pm

      So long as it stays on the level of mere advocacy, it’s protected speech. But if it moves beyond that there could be a chargeable offense.


         
         0 
         
         0
        SField in reply to Milhouse. | November 13, 2024 at 5:59 pm

        But is advocating for the murder of a large demographic of people over a platform with massive reach and then also naming the method/poison to be used still protected? Honest question, I don’t know law, that’s why I hang out here.


 
 0 
 
 1
rhhardin | November 13, 2024 at 9:21 am

Avoid tomato sauces if you have an Italian wife. That’s belladonna right from the start.


     
     0 
     
     0
    henrybowman in reply to rhhardin. | November 13, 2024 at 12:59 pm

    Technically true. When you deal in animal care you learn about all sorts of things you enjoy eating without a thought, that will kill your four-footed friends. Chocolate, peanut and macadamia products, garlic, onion, grapes, avocados.


 
 0 
 
 6
MarkSmith | November 13, 2024 at 9:25 am

make an appointment with a mental health professional,

Well that is not going to help. There was a study out there that found the most liberals on the medical spectrum were mental health professionals. I think heart docs and brain surgeons were the most conservative.

They are SOL. Darwin with take care of then.


 
 0 
 
 9
Idonttweet | November 13, 2024 at 9:32 am

“We will never open an investigation based solely on First Amendment-protected activity.” says an FBI spokesflak.

Everybody who believes that, get off your unicorn and raise your hand.

If these were conservatives, would anyone be surprised to see the FBI or local law enforcement scouring these posts, looking for gun owners, deciding they’re threats to society, and seeking Red Flag warrants to strip them of their 2nd Amendment rights and take their guns away?


     
     0 
     
     0
    henrybowman in reply to Idonttweet. | November 13, 2024 at 1:10 pm

       
       0 
       
       0
      Milhouse in reply to henrybowman. | November 13, 2024 at 6:08 pm

      Not impressed.

      The first story is from Reason, which can sometimes go crazy in its hostility to law enforcement, about a terrorism supporter who once worked for a terrorist-affiliated organization, getting all upset because someone at Facebook was concerned enough about something she had posted there, took a screenshot of the public information, and sent it to the FBI who sent some agents to pay her a polite visit and chat about it. The writer calls it “hassling”, but provides no basis for that construction, so I’m entitled to put my own, less paranoid construction on the facts.

      The writer tries to make something appear sinister by telling us that “Meta’s official policy is to hand over Facebook data to U.S. law enforcement” only in limited circumstances, but what was submitted in this case was not “Facebook data”; it was a screenshot of someone’s public posts.

      In an update he cites a FBI official’s statement that “Every day, the FBI engages with members of the public in furtherance of our mission, which is to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States. We can never open an investigation based solely on First Amendment protected activity.” and wants us to think that this story somehow contradicts that statement, or that the first to sentences somehow contradict each other.

      He is deliberately ignoring, and hoping his gullible readers will not notice, the difference between “engaging with members of the public”, which is what these agents did and what they said they spend all day doing, and “opening an investigation”. The FBI claims it never opens an investigation based solely on First Amendment-protected activity. I hope that is correct and I see no evidence here against it.

      But it does not claim, and in fact denies, that it never engages with members of the public over such activity. It has every right to do so, and it has the duty to do so if it has any concerns. Most people will agree to talk to the agents, explain whatever it is they want to know, and they will walk away knowing (or at least hoping) that there’s nothing bad happening. I can recall several cases where that happened and then it turned out that the concerns were correct, there really was something bad happening, but the agents unfortunately didn’t pick up on it, and thus didn’t investigate further, and didn’t find out what was really happening until people got hurt. And then the public, including right here on LI, is angry at the FBI for having “missed obvious red flags”. Well, if you think it shouldn’t even be allowed to talk to someone without reasonable and articulable suspicion of a crime having been committed, then it will never see any red flags, and more people will be hurt.

      The second link impresses me even less. First of all it”s Infowars, but just looking at the video I didn’t see any support for the poster’s claim that he had shamed the agents, that they felt embarrassed, or “owned”. They look more like they’re patiently having to deal with a nut case, which is part of their job, so they just politely back away. He could have just politely declined to talk to them, instead of going on a rant about the constitution, which they are fully obeying.


 
 0 
 
 8
CommoChief | November 13, 2024 at 9:39 am

Those dumb enough to let their attention seeking narcissism override common sense and post this sort of thing should have zero complaints when employers, family members, or just random people they encounter shame them, fire them/ refuse to hire them, isolate, ostracize or shun them. Start the dragnet, find and dismiss public employees who advocate poisoning people who disagree with them.

Any woman who would actually do this will likely get on TikTok and brag about it. They are broken.

Just curious-Why hasn’t Youtube deleted the video and the account associated with this craze? Seems like it would be against the community standards, especially given what they’ve deleted/shadow banned conservatives for.

It makes perfect sense that the homicidal maniacs of the Dhimmi-crat Party gleefully ally themselves with genocidal, goose-stepping, Jew-hating, Christian-hating and Hindu-hating Islamofascists, Muslim supremacists and terrorists.

These ideological bedfellows are all members of a death cult.


 
 0 
 
 3
LibraryGryffon | November 13, 2024 at 10:27 am

I’m guessing that Newsweek didn’t actually watch any of the videos, because the few I saw were anything but satirical.

Centuries ago, our ancestors burned, or drowned wicked women like these who practised such occluded evil, but our modern enlightened selves cannot fathom how our ancestors could possibly do those horrific acts…

Snap….


 
 0 
 
 1
ThePrimordialOrderedPair | November 13, 2024 at 12:07 pm

Hysterical Paralysis >> Homicidal Psychosis


 
 0 
 
 1
ThePrimordialOrderedPair | November 13, 2024 at 12:09 pm

Just the punchlines:

“Why did you beat your 4th husband to death?”

“Because he wouldn’t eat the soup.”


 
 0 
 
 0
scooterjay | November 13, 2024 at 12:10 pm

I suggest they chug the glüg and remove themselves.


 
 0 
 
 1
scooterjay | November 13, 2024 at 12:11 pm

The real Bitches Brew!


 
 0 
 
 4
E Howard Hunt | November 13, 2024 at 12:21 pm

Just Remember:

The pellet with the poison’s in the vessel with the pestle, the chalice from the palace has the brew that is true.


 
 0 
 
 2
nordic prince | November 13, 2024 at 12:37 pm

Yet more reasons why women’s suffrage was not such a great idea. These wackos should not have the franchise.


 
 0 
 
 0
alaskabob | November 13, 2024 at 1:00 pm

Lucrezia Borgia Brigade


 
 0 
 
 2
irishgladiator63 | November 13, 2024 at 1:31 pm

So…they’re planning to murder both their significant others and/or random men and they justify it because these men “abused” them by possibly voting for Trump.
That sounds completely logical to me and will definitely be an airtight defense at trial.


 
 0 
 
 0
ThePrimordialOrderedPair | November 13, 2024 at 1:33 pm

Anorexia >> Homicidal Psychosis

The moment a single man dies (or is only saved by medical intervention) of this concoction, you have a direct line to incitement for every single one of these women. I would love to make my name as a famous prosecutor by dragging all of them into court, possibly even as a RICO, and send a bunch to prison.

I can also see some man now concocting this brew and putting it in something and eating just enough to get a little sick, and accusing his significant other of doing it. I mean there are actually toxic men out there, to whom they have now given ideas. Stupid.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.