Image 01 Image 03

ILA Longshoremen Strike at East and Gulf Coast Ports

ILA Longshoremen Strike at East and Gulf Coast Ports

“An analysis by J.P. Morgan estimated the daily cost of a port strike by East and Gulf Coast port workers would cost the U.S. economy between $3.8 billion and $4.5 billion per day as operations slow.”

The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) members at East and Gulf Coast ports left the job at 12:01 AM ET.

The strike concerns an expired “master contract with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX).”

From CNBC:

In a last-ditch effort on Monday to avert a strike that will cause significant harm to the U.S. economy if it is lengthy — at least hundreds of millions of dollars a day at the largest ports like New York/New Jersey — the USMX offered a nearly 50% wage hike over six years, but that was rejected by the ILA, according to a source close to the negotiations. The port ownership group said it hoped the offer would lead to a resumption of collective bargaining.

The 14 ports where preparations for a strike have been underway are Boston, New York/New Jersey, Philadelphia, Wilmington, North Carolina, Baltimore, Norfolk, Charleston, Savannah, Jacksonville, Tampa, Miami, New Orleans, Mobile, and Houston.

The longshoremen haven’t gone on strike since 1977.

The union exempted cruise ships and military cargoes.

However, the strike will likely disrupt the supply chain:

Those ports collectively handle about half of U.S. imports and are also critical hubs for exports from American businesses.

Imports of cars and auto parts, agricultural products like bananas, machinery, fabricated steel, furniture, apparel and more will be affected. East and Gulf Coast ports also handle significant percentages of exported cars and auto parts, pharmaceutical products, beef, pork, poultry, eggs, wood, plastics and other products or commodities.

An analysis by J.P. Morgan estimated the daily cost of a port strike by East and Gulf Coast port workers would cost the U.S. economy between $3.8 billion and $4.5 billion per day as operations slow.

President Joe Biden announced he wouldn’t use the Taft-Hartley Act to intervene.

The law would allow Biden to “take action that results in an 80-day ‘cooling off’ period for negotiations to resume while workers are back at work.”

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce wanted Biden to invoke the law to “protect our economy.”

Hurricane Helene already closed ports.

Companies anticipated the strike. Those in charge moved shipping orders to the West Coast, especially since the holiday season is coming up:

Logistics experts have told CNBC in recent months there has been an exodus of cargo from the East to West Coast, and companies moved up orders for peak shipping season due to the strike risk. Both economists and logistics executives say the impact of the strike depends on how long the work stoppage lasts.

“A disruption of a week or two will create some backlogs but the broader consequences will be minimal outside of a handful of very port-reliant areas, including Savannah,” said Adam Kamins, economist at Moody’s Analytics. “But anything longer will lead to shortages and upward price pressures,” he said.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

https://gcaptain.com/port-workers-union-on-strike-in-36-us-ports-teamsters-warn-biden/

ILA UNION ON STRIKE IN 36 US PORTS – Teamsters Warn Biden To ‘Stay the F**k Out of This Fight’

IMO these union members are shooting themselves in the face. More automation is coming and now these goons have demonstrated another key reason for even more automation; the automated processes don’t strike. Normal folks don’t realize how bad this could get b/c they understand how dependent we are on imports. If you haven’t bought coffee lately you may want to do it today, same.for bananas as just two everyday examples.

    ALWAYS keep a 6 month supply of coffee on hand.

      rhhardin in reply to Andy. | October 1, 2024 at 9:47 am

      Around 1981 there was a coffee freeze in Brazil and supply dropped. Restaurants dropped the second cup free and bottomless coffee policies. The coffee section in Kroger shrunk to a small display at high prices. Yet you could always get coffee, all you wanted. How much you wanted was reduced, however. Nobody put price controls on coffee, so it was always available.

      The poor of course couldn’t afford coffee. Suppose as a nice guy you gave every poor person $10 to buy a pound of coffee as they walked into the store. What happens? They don’t use it to buy coffee. They buy something worth more to them than coffee with it. They can’t afford coffee at $10 a point even if they have $10, meaning that something else means more to them.

      gonzotx in reply to Andy. | October 1, 2024 at 10:03 am

      Caffeine pills work

Hmm. Back the union, and screw over the economy more, or use an 80 cooling off period to avoid a debilitating strike.

Biden picks door #1. Is this to mess with Harris with more abysmal economic decisions?

It sure won’t hurt Pres. Trump.

Empty store shelves and inflation spiking.

Dementia Joe is on the beach.

The union gets 77%, the rest of you can eat cake…well since there is no cake you can eat bugs! That will make Bill and Klaus happy.

Coulda been a contenduh, Charlie, instead of a bum, let’s face it, Charlie, that’s what I am

Good grief, this union is entitlement driven to the point of insanity.

JackinSilverSpring | October 1, 2024 at 10:23 am

The Brandon Administration is shooting itself in the foot by not invoking Taft-Hartley. If this strike continues for several weeks, then prices will rise and people will be laid off. Come Nov. 1st a lot of people will find themselves in a worse place than a month earlier. That should not help improve Harris’ chance of getting elected.

Dolce Far Niente | October 1, 2024 at 10:43 am

Why not invoke Taft/Hartley? I imagine the Kamala/Abortion campaign thinks they can create an instant heroine if it can be stage-managed so The She can claim credit for ending the strike.

One can only hope the longshoremen remain intransigent.

Gotta admire his swagger. Fugetaboutit. There’s close to 20 million “Migrants” that would gladly take those jobs for one quarter the pay. Those jobs and many more like them. Part of the plan? And I thought Democrats were pro union!

I vaguely remember a longshoremen’s strike back in the early 1950’s when they were striking to eliminate the containerize cargo being implemented at that time.

destroycommunism | October 1, 2024 at 11:32 am

the fjb front is~~~ we dont care

behind the scenes….kamala is
hurry up and fix this

FJB COULD STRIKE BACK AT KAMALA and the rest of them for forcing him out by not allowing this to be settled which of course would make for her to even look worse ( thought that was impossible???!!)

Sounds like economic terrorism to me, especially since they state their goal is to inflict this on the economy.

    ThePrimordialOrderedPair in reply to slagothar. | October 1, 2024 at 2:15 pm

    You can drop the “economic” modifier. This is terrorism, plain and simple. It is an act of war.

Seems strange that according to the union itself the average wage is nearly $150,000 plus benefits and they want 77% more? No sympathy here. The Gulf and East Coast ports were benefiting from an increase in freight due to companies shifting over to them during the last west coast strikes having had enough. Extensive dredging and port improvements were bringing in the business and put the massive expansion of the Matamoros, Mexico plans for a port and rail facility on hold not to mention renewed interest in a second canal on the original route through Nicaragua to handle larger ships. Bet those plans for Mexico are revived now.
Highly efficient automated ports are the standard around the world and are coming whether those union guys like it or not

destroycommunism | October 1, 2024 at 11:56 am

the best thing would be to let all these migrants replace them at 80% less wage/benefits

win/winnnnnn

destroycommunism | October 1, 2024 at 1:58 pm

wonder if msm will show violent behavior by unionsits

ThePrimordialOrderedPair | October 1, 2024 at 2:13 pm

Harold Daggett and the ILA are waging a war on America, abetted by Triator Joe and his junta. There is no other description of this. This is what terrorism looks like and Daggett, the ILA, and the Biden junta are the terrorists looking to strangle America in pursuit of some idiotic labor negotiations that only a total retard would accept.

People need to put these traitors in proper perspective and recognize their explicit attempt to destroy America.

Ferfuggs eggs | October 1, 2024 at 4:12 pm

‘Nice little business you have hear… It’s be real shame if you ran out of products to sell and have to shut it down…’- Dock monkey mafia trying to gather support from the average citizen.

The Gentle Grizzly | October 1, 2024 at 4:36 pm

I’m reading some of the comments over at x. One would think that the longshoremen are all starving to death and living in cardboard boxes. Someone brought up the San Francisco strike of back in the ’20s or something along that line and fighting the “. Pinkerton bastards”.

If I had a job that paid me $160 to $180,000 a year to basically operate a giant forklift, I would consider myself lucky. Yes, the harbor is a dangerous place. But so is delivering pizza and all but the best neighborhoods. They get no sympathy from me.

star1701gazer | October 1, 2024 at 6:36 pm

Play along with me for just a minute and try to view this from the other side:

You are a 50 something union worker with a good paying (100k +/year), non-degreed job. You and the union understand that automation is coming to your job and will replace 70% of the current jobs. Your option is to lose your job (and your health insurance), go on unemployment (@ 35K/year), and try to train for a new job skill while not losing your house and your kids college fund; or you can fight to postpone the inevitable until you can make the magical age of 62 and qualify for early Social Security. Do you fight?

Now the Union is not stupid, they know they are fighting a rearguard action. The goal is not the pay raise (which is why they turned down a 50% increase, it was not ever about the pay). Do they want a raise? Yes. 77%, not really. The ridiculous ask was to force the important issue of protecting jobs. The union’s goal (IMO) is to try to protect their jobs at least for the length of the next contract. This will give the younger members the opportunity to find new jobs or train for a career change while still holding a good paying job that supports their family. It gives the older workers who are closing in on retirement to hold on until they can retire, with job losses going to attrition as people find other jobs or leave for other reasons. The Union knows automation is coming no matter what, as changes are inevitable. They see their job is to make the best moves for their workers as the change comes.

Now just ask yourself, do you fight to protect your career, or do you roll over, take unemployment and government assistance while moaning about how unfair life is?

I know this line of thought will not be popular as Unions are all evil and have never done one good thing for anybody anywhere…. /s

    ThePrimordialOrderedPair in reply to star1701gazer. | October 1, 2024 at 8:28 pm

    … and so, to serve your own little interests (not even that since you’re making far more than you warrant, right now) you threaten to cripple America – to wage war on America – to bring pain and suffering to all the citizenry.

    Lovely …

    The ILA is waging war on the nation. Plain and simple. They need to be automated away as soon as possible. Frankly, all of these current workers should get the air traffic controller treatment.