Image 01 Image 03

Judge Rejects RFK Jr.’s Attempt to Withdraw From Michigan Ballot

Judge Rejects RFK Jr.’s Attempt to Withdraw From Michigan Ballot

Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher P. Yates: “Elections are not just games, and the Secretary of State (SOS) is not obligated to honor the whims of candidates for public office.”

A Michigan judge rejected RFK Jr.’s request to remove his name from the Michigan ballot, citing insufficient legal grounds since RFK Jr. met the state’s requirements to be listed as a candidate. Kennedy, who suspended his campaign on August 23rd, had argued that staying on the ballot would mislead voters and undermine election integrity.

It’s ironic because Kennedy claimed he dropped out due to Democrats trying to silence him, but now that he’s endorsed Trump, they seem eager to keep him on the ballot. Despite Kennedy’s request, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson refused to remove his name.

His attorney, Eric Esshaki, noted that Kennedy had given adequate notice by August 30 for removal and pushed for a swift resolution, especially with absentee ballots set to be mailed soon.

Bloomberg Law: 

Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson (D) “acted well within the bounds of the law” when her office denied a last-minute attempt by the third-party candidate to remove himself from the ballot, Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher P. Yates wrote in a three-page opinion.

“Elections are not just games, and the Secretary of State (SOS) is not obligated to honor the whims of candidates for public office,” Yates wrote, adding that state law says third parties can’t switch their candidates after the state’s primary election in August.

 

 

 

 

 

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

What about all the ballots completed on Sundowner for the election?


 
 0 
 
 3
scooterjay | September 4, 2024 at 4:18 pm

fighting to keep Trump off the ballot and denying a “traitor” the desire to get off the ballot while installing a candidate no one voted for on the ballot.
Okay.


 
 0 
 
 2
SeymourButz | September 4, 2024 at 4:22 pm

How can you force someone to run for office against their will?

“…is not obligated to honor the whims of candidates for public office.”

Except when that person is No. Longer. A. Candidate.

These nitwits need to be curb stomped (politically speaking, of course)


 
 0 
 
 2
henrybowman | September 4, 2024 at 4:26 pm

“adding that state law says third parties can’t switch their candidates after the state’s primary election in August.”

Note that. Third parties.
There’s always a Torricelli Exception available to the Uniparty. Always.


 
 0 
 
 5
Peter Moss | September 4, 2024 at 5:03 pm

I’m of the opinion that the laws dealing with our elections are being routinely flouted in order to give advantage to a particular political party.

I’m also of the opinion that if we don’t put a stop to it there won’t be much need to hold elections.

Further, I am also of the opinion that punishment for election fraud and interference is *much* too light.

For instance, those gentlemen putting up paper to conceal tabulation during the 2020 election should have received 20 years at hard labor. If you conspire to defraud by electronic means (you know what I mean) I think the punishment should be death?

Why? Because that kind of activity deprived millions of their liberty by nullifying their vote.


     
     0 
     
     2
    mailman in reply to Peter Moss. | September 4, 2024 at 5:08 pm

    There seems to be no good reason to cover up counting votes like the Democrats did that night.

    Sadly this only stops when there are more people with a vested interest in enforcing laws than there are to turning a blind eye.

Look at that photograph again. RFK Jr. is Blacker than Obama. Now that he has endorsed Trump, he should change his face color to Orange.


 
 1 
 
 0
destroycommunism | September 4, 2024 at 5:44 pm

so what!!

people are going to vote for who they want to

pro americans for trump

commiunistlovingnazighouls for dems


     
     0 
     
     0
    mailman in reply to destroycommunism. | September 4, 2024 at 7:12 pm

    It’s important because believe theye are those who will vote for JFK instead of Trump and Democrats are figuring that this number is big enough to move things in their favour.

    Hence why they’ve moved heaven and earth to remove people from the ballot that could hurt Kamala’s chances in the election.

RFK, Jr. wants off the ballot in Michigan, but not in other states.
From,
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rfk-jr-ballot-battleground-states/

On Aug. 23, Kennedy suspended his campaign and endorsed Trump. Kennedy said his name would remain on the ballot in many noncompetitive states. But in the seven battleground states and three others that he considers competitive, he would request to have his name removed from the ballot.

“Our polling consistently showed that by staying on the ballot in the battleground states, I would likely hand the election over to the Democrats, with whom I disagree on the most existential issues,” he said.

I think we could agree this reeks of gamesmanship.
If RFK, Jr. wanted off the ballot in all states, that would be a different matter.


 
 0 
 
 0
E Howard Hunt | September 4, 2024 at 6:59 pm

RFK, Jr is a senior now.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.