Image 01 Image 03

Experts Predict Illegal Aliens Will Cast Almost Three Million Ballots in Election

Experts Predict Illegal Aliens Will Cast Almost Three Million Ballots in Election

“A 2014 academic journal found that 6.4% of noncitizens voted in 2008”

That is more than enough to sway the election and this is why Democrats have allowed this invasion.

The Daily Signal reports:

Experts Predict Up to 2.7M Votes Will Be Cast by Illegal Immigrants

Do you plan to vote this November? You’re not alone. Experts say somewhere between 1.5 million and 2.7 million illegal immigrants are likely to cast a ballot in the 2024 elections, affecting races from dogcatcher to president of the United States.

The historic flood of illegal immigrants during the Biden-Harris administration has also padded voter rolls, thanks to controversial federal legislation from the Clinton administration. If illegal immigrants and other noncitizens vote in the same proportion as in previous U.S. elections, the number will range anywhere from 1.5 million to nearly 3 million votes.

“A 2014 academic journal found that 6.4% of noncitizens voted in 2008,” Kerri Toloczko, executive director of Election Integrity Network and senior adviser to the Only Citizens Vote Coalition, told The Washington Stand. “There are about 24 million noncitizens in the U.S. right now. If they voted only at the same rate of 6.4% this year as they did in 2008, they would account for 1.5 million votes.”

That ponderous number of unlawful votes may just be the tip of the iceberg. “Based on the increased noncitizen activity at state DMVs, and the work of left-wing voter registration activists, this 6.4% could be much higher than it was in 2008. We could be looking at over 2 million unlawful noncitizen votes,” she told the Washington Stand.

Her estimate largely dovetails with a previous study showing 2.7 million noncitizens are likely to vote in the 2024 election.

The author of that study—James D. Agresti, the president and co-founder of the think tank and fact-check website Just Facts—confirmed to the Washington Stand that “the most comprehensive, transparent, and rigorous study on this matter found that about 2 [million] to 5 million noncitizens are illegally registered to vote, and aggressive attempts to debunk the study have completely failed.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

And while we’re on this topic, my tinfoil hat suggested to me that it’s possible the “SAVE Act” is another piece of gaslighting.

This bill requires individuals to provide documentary proof of U.S. citizenship in order to register to vote in federal elections. Specifically, the bill prohibits states from accepting and processing an application to register to vote in a federal election unless the applicant presents documentary proof of U.S. citizenship. Further, the bill (1) prohibits states from registering an individual to vote in a federal election unless, at the time the individual applies to register to vote, the individual provides documentary proof of U.S. citizenship; and (2) requires states to establish an alternative process under which an applicant may submit other evidence to demonstrate U.S. citizenship.

Not that I’m against this, I’m all for it. My question is about how much of this is eyewash and gaslighting?

As a gun activist, I’ve seen this dance dozens of times. There’s some tragedy. Goo-gooers get together and pass “Skibidi’s Law”* making some element of the crime illegal (e.g., shooting into the sky) — despite it having already been illegal (e.g., public endangerment, reckless discharge, etc.) at the time the original guy did it. But everybody makes a big fuss and votes for it, so they can tell their constituents all about how they Did Something. Once they’ve successfully made it Double Plus illegal, they can all go back home to bone the cute Chinese spy.

So my question is: am I suppose to believe that the “rule” of restricting Election Day to citizens was never actually the law, but just a “convention?” That we’ve been conducting our secure elections on nothing more than a “gentlemen’s agreement” for the past 200+ years? if anybody can answer yes to this, please explain to me how.

*There’s a saying in the brotherhood that any law named after a victim is a bad law. The research and proof is an exercise left to the reader.

The invaders, who are working, paying taxes and Social Security, under a stolen identity, feel this gives them the right to vote, even though, were they to do this in their home country, they’d be imprisoned for twenty years or more, if they were lucky.