Legal Insurrection readers may recall that “Disease X” was on the agenda at this year’s annual globalist shindig in Davos, Switzerland.
It comes after warnings from experts that a hypothetical new pandemic could kill 20 times more people than the recent coronavirus outbreak. It is hoped that with the correct research framework in place and enough knowledge in place on a global level, a future pandemic could be eliminated in just 100 days.
Canadian officials are now taking the “Disease X” ball and running with it, warning citizens to prepare for a hypothetical new virus that could lead to food and fuel disruptions in a new handbook its health officials have released.
The Centre for Occupational Health and Safety rolled out a second edition of their Flu and Infectious Disease Outbreaks Business Continuity Plan Handbook.The guide provides information for employers on what to prepare for in the face of another pandemic.In the new edition, released in June, they focus on a ‘hypothetical virus’, that they warn could trigger further disruption that Covid-19.It states that ‘based on trends from past pandemic flu, there may be a higher average number of illness and deaths in age groups different than what we typically see during annual flu seasons.’The guide also warns employers must be ready for a scenario like an disease outbreak or a pandemic which forces people to stay home….It adds that people should brace for disruptions like reduced labor, supply chain issues and shifts in consumer demand.Among those disruptions include telecommunications, banking, water, gasoline, medicine and food.
Socialism is more apt to cause disruptions in supplies of goods, medicine, and gasoline. But I digress.
What appears to have happened is that the Canadian Health officials updated their business continuity template to reflect a more comprehensive approach to dealing with a pandemic.
The document offers scare-tistics in addition with the checklists typically associated with a business continuity planning….which I do as part of my day job when I am not writing about viruses for Legal Insurrection.
The Public Health Agency of Canada also warns that, based on trends from past pandemic flus, there may be a higher average number of illness and deaths in age groups different than what we typically see during annual flu seasons.For example, the 1918 pandemic flu resulted in more illnesses among people under 65 and in particular people aged 20 to 40, unlike a “typical” flu that affects the very young and very old. If this historic pattern re-emerges, a large proportion of the workforce could be affected.Based on their model, an estimated 4.5 to 10.6 million Canadians would become clinically ill such that they would be unable to attend work or other activities for at least a half a day. Indeed, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in almost 5 million Canadian cases, and over 59,000 reported deaths that can be directly attributed.
The response to this update underscores the lack of trust in public health officials after the draconian and destructive COVID policies.
For those of you curious, the next Canadian elections are slated for October 2025. So, it’s a titch early for their election-time pandemic mania.
If the Canadian government were truly so interested in protecting the lives of Canadians, perhaps a reevaluation of the Medical Assistance in Death (MAID) program would be warranted.
A new report on assisted suicide in Canada – which the country’s government labels as “medical assistance in dying” (MAiD) – has found that the practise has risen thirteen-fold since legalisation in 2016 and has become a “routine” practise. It also found that the average time between request and an “assisted death” being carried out is about 11 days.Published on 7 August, the report titled “From Exceptional to Routine: The Rise of Euthanasia in Canada” says Canada is now far beyond the limitations expected or that were recommended to safeguard against potential problems when the practise was legalised.“The growing number of MAiD deaths, and the continued expansion of eligibility criteria, is far beyond the expectations set in Carter v. Canada, the court case that decriminalised assisted dying in 2015,” states the report.“Consequently, MAiD is now far more than exceptional: It is routine. Almost no MAiD requests are denied by clinicians, and the median time between written request and death from MAiD in 2022 was merely eleven days. Despite judges’ and policymakers’ claims or expectations, MAiD is no longer an option of ‘last resort’.
I will conclude with this thought:
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY