Image 01 Image 03

Vanderbilt U. Multicultural Leadership Council Rejects Pro-Israel Student Group

Vanderbilt U. Multicultural Leadership Council Rejects Pro-Israel Student Group

“Groups that were accepted included Jewish Voice for Peace at Vanderbilt, the Vanderbilt Iranian Student Association, and Vanderbilt Pride Serve.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV_j4Dh9koA

The students who make up this council probably believe they’re against hate. They can’t even see the irony.

The College Fix reports:

Vanderbilt multicultural council rejects pro-Israel student group

The Vanderbilt Multicultural Leadership Council denied a pro-Israel student group a spot in its organization back in March, but some members just recently opened up to the student paper about their reasons for voting “nay.”

According to The Hustler, Students Supporting Israel was rejected by the Vandy MLC, the only group to receive a majority “nay” vote — 76 percent — of 11 organizations that applied this spring semester.

One other group was denied membership, the Vanderbilt United Mission for Relief and Development, but it fell just shy of the two-thirds majority required for acceptance, getting 60 percent of votes in favor.

Both groups were the only MLC rejections “in at least the past few years,” MLC President Zack Maaieh said.

Groups that were accepted included Jewish Voice for Peace at Vanderbilt, the Vanderbilt Iranian Student Association, and Vanderbilt Pride Serve.

According to its constitution, the MLC is an “’umbrella organization’ of Vanderbilt’s social justice, identity-based and multicultural student organizations.”

Various MLC members admitted that the denial of SSI’s membership was due to it being “antithetical” to the “Palestinian cause.” As such, the SSI does not want to work “toward unity” and “does not truly want to collaborate with other student groups.”

A member of the Jewish Voice for Peace noted they voted “nay” due to SSI being a “secular” organization; however, so is Vandy’s Students for Justice in Palestine — which is a member of the MLC.

The JVP member added that SSI’s “pitch” to join the MLC was “unconvincing.”

An executive board member of the Association of Latin American Students was particularly outspoken against SSI, saying the group doesn’t have “a culture or an identity” because it “support[s] a nation-state built on the ideology of political Zionism.”

The ALAS member also alleged accepting SSI would have “obstructed” the Multicultural Leadership Council from being a “safe space” for other member groups.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Has anybody noticed that there never seem to be any adverse consequences to those who

—exclude supporters of Israel

—slaughter Christian’s

—rape and mutilate Jews

—advocate murder of whites

—kidnap Yazidi girls

—torch Christian churches

—torch Hindu temples

—etc etc etc etc

Wheerd.

Maybe it must be my imagination. What’s on tv tonight

destroycommunism | June 14, 2024 at 12:49 pm

fear of a blmplo planet taking place

PostLiberal | June 14, 2024 at 8:23 pm

Various MLC members admitted that the denial of SSI’s membership was due to it being “antithetical” to the “Palestinian cause.” As such, the SSI does not want to work “toward unity” and “does not truly want to collaborate with other student groups.”

Funny thing, these lefties are always informing us how much they are in favor of “diversity.” Here they deny membership to a group- a form of “cancelling”- with the “diverse” opinion. After all, “unity” of opinion is MUCH MORE important than “diversity” of opinion.

Regarding the “unity” of the pro-Palestinian students, I am reminded of countless videos of those pro-Palestinian students exhibiting their gross ignorance of the facts. Here is a recent example: Trump-loving drag queen ‘Lady Maga’ schools anti-Israel Pride marcher in viral video.

I am once again reminded of that William F. Buckley, Jr. quote:

Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover that there are other views.

But muslim nations with horrific human rights records, consumed by civil wars with muslim against muslim violence, and muslim against non-muslim violence, are all welcome?

Double standard much?

May I remind everyone here you are paying for Vanderbilt?

The fact that we are paying for it definitely entitles us to a voice in how it conducts itself.