Trump Guilty Verdict: “There are some serious constitutional problems with this case”

Twitter (X) law is like the broken clock that is right twice a day.

I saw multiple people tweeting that a video released by Yale Law Professor Jed Rubenfeld was a must watch on the basics and potential constitutional problems of the Trump ‘hush money’ trial guilty verdict.

They were right.

I know nothing about Rubenfeld, but he doesn’t come across as partisan on either side. And a lot of his arguments are consistent with the arguments we made in our Telegraph Op-Ed (though he makes them better, but in fairness, we were under a 650 word limit).

I don’t have a transcript of his video, but here’s a handy guide from his YouTube posting:

The Trump hush-money criminal trial verdict is in—and it’s guilty. What does it mean? And what’s next? In the debut episode of my new show—Straight Down the Middle—I will walk you through it all. As a professor of law, one-time federal prosecutor, and constitutional law scholar, I have over three decades of experience with complex constitutional issues and I want to share everything I know with you and how it applies to the issues we see in the real world. In this episode, I walk through The Basics of the Trump verdict, The Constitutional Issues facing the conviction, and the Next Steps. Chapters: 0:00Intro 0:48The Basics 7:45The Constitutional Issues 16:28Next Steps 22:37 Outro

WATCH. THE. WHOLE. THING.

Tags: Trump Manhattan Indictment

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY