WHY are the two decisions linked to abortion?
Someone “accidentally” posted the Supreme Court’s decision for Moyle v. United States.
The case relates to an Idaho law that bans abortions in emergency situations.
The opinion shows an affirmative vote, 6-3, with Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas dissenting.
That means Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh vote yes.
SCOTUS’s press office said the court has not been released.
“The opinion in Moyle v. United States, No. 23-726, and Idaho v. United States, No. 23-727, has not been released,” said spokeswoman Patricia McCabe. “The Court’s Publications Unit inadvertently and briefly uploaded a document to the Court’s website. The Court’s opinion in Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States will be issued in due course.”
Idaho’s law allows abortion if a mother’s life is at risk.
If the opinion is authentic, then it is the second time this term SCOTUS has “deflected ruling on the merits of abortion.”
The majority said that “women could retain access to emergency abortions as the case works its way through the courts.”
However, I want to bring attention to Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s concurring opinion.
Jackson uses the phrase pregnant patients.
Justice Elena Kagen said pregnant women in her opinion. Jackson?
Pregnant patients.
Senator Blackburn: "Can you provide a definition for the word woman?"
Judge Jackson: "No. I can't…I'm not a biologist." pic.twitter.com/TRlqUeDGs6
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) March 23, 2022
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Hey, PregPerFo!
“That means Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh vote yes.”
Who continue on following the all-too-typical R choices: nominated by an R but reject R principles. Like, Brennan (Ike), O’Conner (Reagan), Kennedy (Reagan), Souter (Bush 1), and the all-time-leader of being nominated by an R with the expectation of following the Constitution but refusing to do so is Harry Blackmun (Nixon) known as the architect of the American holocaust (410 U.S. 113).
Guess who picked two out of those three. Is ACB auditioning for the RBG seat?
I know, I know. He allowed himself to be snookered. He was too much a babe in the woods filled with wolves.
It’s worth noting that the ruling is not on the merits, but addresses only whether a preliminary injunction during the pendency of the case should stand or not, until the merits of the case are finally decided in the trial court. It makes sense in terms of timing. The case issue addresses the interplay between a piece of state legislation and a federal statute dealing with emergency room care. The last thing conservatives need in play before November is a scotus ruling asserting in a procedural context, that state laws banning abortions takes precedence over federal legislation that may or may not preserve a statutory form of an right to abortion under federal legislation addressing emergency room services. Hobbs had a real impact in the midterms adverse to the conservative cause. There’s no need, in the non- merits setting of a procedural issue relating to injunctive relief, to create a casus belli for the left before this election. The ruling is a proper one and helpful to the cause.
Don’t forget Hugo Black (Ike) who is such an embarrassment to his fellow Alabamians.
.
“Someone “accidentally” posted the Supreme Court’s decision for Moyle v. United States.”
And why not? Because there are never any consequences.
Put the FIB on it. It will be buried in no time.
Why don’t they accidentally post the decision on presidential immunity I wonder?
Roberts is either complicit in these abortion leaks, or incompetent in properly addressing (and preventing) them. A pattern seems to be emerging where this happens only with abortion-related cases and, the more it happens, the more Roberts appears complicit. He was either covering up the previous decision’s leak, or didn’t want to know who did it and how.
Once the leak was done without anyone caught, it’s a free for all
I always get a kick out of this. Farangi Jackson Brown was too stupid to realize that she was saying exactly the OPPOSITE of what she wanted to say. If she defers the definition of “woman” to a biologist then I am with her (though it just goes to show she’s too dumb to be able to bring up an easy biological definition of “woman”). But whata Farangi Jackson Brown was TRYING to say, in her very un-clever way, was that it is NOT up to biology to determine what a woman is, but only the fleeting feelings of some mental case for any given moment.
This tiny exchange showed that Farangi Jackson Brown is not just a demented pervert who likes to claim that she doesn’t know what a woman is but that she is also so incredibly stupid that she gives an evading answer that is 180 degrees opposed to what she is trying to say.
… But, then … maybe she’s just a satirical genius and her whole life is one big piece of performance art satire?!
They aren’t women. They are Front Holes, according to the left.
Yeah … I couldn’t believe it the first time I heard someone say that seriously. Crazy.
I had to tell her that guys have “front holes”, too. That’s why we can write our names in the snow. I explained that she probably meant “gash”, which used to be the slang term.
No, women have vaginas. Mutilated men have “front holes”.
That’s all women are to them. Meat sacks with a convenient hole.
I wonder how Jackson knows she(?) is a woman? I presume she(?) thinks she is.
Can I be black now, and get reparations?
The Court now has a 6-3 liberal majority.
Robert’s compromised
Amy, a liberal all the time
Kavanaugh, a coward wuz
Amy Phoney Barrett’s FIRST act as SCOTUS justice was to recuse from the all-important Pennsylvania mail-in ballot/drop-off box case, where the governor was writing new law every day and demanding that anything resembling a ballot, from a dirty napkin to a soiled piece of toilet paper, with the name “Biden” on it somewhere must be accepted and counted as a legitimate vote. Barrett bowed out and let the Court hang on that and side with the lower court, leaving Pennsylvania to have the Governor making new law at his whim – since legislatures are just for show, anyway … That’s was Amy Phoney Barrett’s first official act as a SCOTUS justice.
one of my biggest pet peeves from the court amongst the many that we all ( well, us pro americans that is) have is that PA case
a clear violation of the law took place
It’s because of Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominees. He chose these people.
Reminder: JR, the purveyor of fake quotes, was praising the same justices after the Dobbs decision and crediting Bitch McConnell for them.
Daily reminder to you that your TDS has left a hideous rash where your face was, and I strongly urge you to get (medical) help.
Trump is responsible for all of these Supreme Court decisions. Do you really think that if he is re-elected that anything will change? Of course not. He never learns. He is a real estate developer. If a Supreme Court vacancy occurs, he will nominate someone just like Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh. We will be worse off than we currently are. God help us.
I forgot to mention that Trump was also a television reality show host. That’s another one of his qualifications to be President of the United States. He was also a regular on Saturday Night Live.
First of all, quit upvoting yourself.
Trump ain’t the one casting the votes, dumbass. His picks came with bona fide conservative credentials, and Gorsuch has been a great addition.
I suspect that Kavanaugh is still impacted by what he went through during his nomination process. Coney Barrett is what you get when you nominate a woman for the Supreme Court, so I’ll grant you that..
The fact that Trump is a developer, TV star, USFL mogul, and billionaire businessman makes him FAR more qualified than your hero FJB.
Face it, dingus. Your TDS makes anything you say about Trump completely irrelevant.
As for me, I’m in alignment with what Lincoln said about Grant:
“I can’t spare this man, he fights.”
You? You roll over onto your belly while wringing your hands and whining “But Trump.”
Begone.
they didnt do anything about it the other time(s) so why stop now
ironic,, that it was leaked
they scotus just ruled in favor of government over the people/free speech
and now someone (again) used their unethical /illegal powers/actions to usurp the court!!
how fitting
liberals are socialists and socialism leads to communism
abortion and leak
somehow go together
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM6SPWGQs-A&t=223s
Try this on ketanji non woman ashhole.
Last time the regime created the charade of an investigation to identify the specific leaker. Time to just fire the employee who “accidentally” released the post. Guilty or not guilty of the actual leak—who cares? The firing would be strictly pour encourager les autres.
Not just fire – prosecute.
There are no accidents in government functions — the intelligence agencies have a reach inside SCOTUS
Sotomayor’s clerks have done it again. Too bad there aren’t any consequences.
Leave a Comment