Male High School Athletes Dominate Female Track-and-Field Championships
Five males took titles from females.
The 2023-2024 school year ends with five males snatching track-and-field title events from females in Connecticut, New Hampshire, Maine, Oregon, and Washington.
Those who defend the insanity will say five is not a lot, but one is one too many. These titles belong to females.
The males followed the rules since the states allowed them to compete in female categories. From The Washington Times:
Lizzy Bidwell, a junior at Connecticut’s Conard High School, who won the triple jump with a leap of 36 feet, 8 inches, which was 14 inches longer than the runner-up at the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference Class LL Girls Championships in New Britain. Bidwell was also the runner-up in the long jump and high jump, amassing points that helped Conard take second place at the May 29 championship meet.
🧵Male athlete, Lizzy Bidwell wins GIRLS high jump below ⬇️
Had the male jumper competed in the boys' high jump event, he would have underperformed last place (21st) by 4 inches. The winner of the boys' event jumped over 7 feet compared to his 5'9" performance. pic.twitter.com/Y4hYtt4Yel
— ICONS (@icons_women) March 4, 2024
Maelle Jacques, a sophomore at New Hampshire’s Kearsarge Regional High School, who won the girls’ high jump May 18 at the Wilderness Track and Field Championship and also placed second in the 1600-meter run.
🚨New GIRLS state title falls to BOY‼️
Male jock Maelle Jacques tied female athlete Sya McKay for the New Hampshire GIRLS state title yesterday, both clearing a high jump of 5 feet. https://t.co/sCJ9sUsyir pic.twitter.com/kRrb0u3eZU
— ICONS (@icons_women) May 24, 2024
Soren Stark-Chessa, a sophomore at Maine Coast Waldorf School who competes for North Yarmouth Academy, took first in the 800-meter race June 1 at the Maine Class C State Championship in Standish with a time of 2.19.72. That finish was a full 10 seconds faster than that of the silver medalist, Natalie Johnson, who timed in at 2:29.84.
MAINE: A boy who identifies as a "girl" won the Women's Varsity 800m at the Maine Class C State Championships last week.
Soren Stark-Chessa would have come in 19th place had he competed with the other boys. pic.twitter.com/1yhE9Bfm9o
— REDUXX (@ReduxxMag) June 8, 2024
Aayden Gallagher, a sophomore at Oregon’s McDaniel High School, who took first in the girls’ 200-meter dash May 18 at the Oregon School Activities Association 6A Track and Field State Championships in Eugene. Gallagher also took second in the 400-meter run.
🔥Must WATCH: Oregon state girls 400m champion Josie Donelson scorches male athlete Aayden Gallagher to WIN in record time! #savewomenssports pic.twitter.com/VTXd0eLmuT
— ICONS (@icons_women) May 19, 2024
Veronica Garcia, a junior at Washington’s East Valley High School, who took gold in the girls’ 2A 400-meter run May 25 at the Washington Interscholastic Athletic Association’s 2A, 3A, 4A State Championship Meet in Tacoma. Garcia, who won the 400 at all seven meets ahead of the state championships, was also a top competitor this year in the 1600-meter, 3200-meter, 300-meter hurdles, and 4X400 relay, as shown on Athletic.net. Asked about the state victory, Garcia told a local reporter: “I don’t know. Maybe just another day in the office. Nothing special for me. I just run.”
Veronica Garcia won the girls' 400m at the Washington State Championship today!
Veronica is a male. If schools want to win Championships
they do this.Yes, the education system is failing your children even worse than past generations. pic.twitter.com/MZyIaeLMSC
— "Captain" Jack Harris🎙 🇺🇸 🇳🇿 (@AC_Black_) May 26, 2024
🚩 "Just another day at the office," says the BOY who bumped a teenage GIRL off the winner's podium at the Washington state track championships. @wiaa #TakeBackTitleIXpic.twitter.com/rKewpQyLmI
— ICONS (@icons_women) May 29, 2024
SheWon.org archives the times males took anything from females in sports. It is not just about first place. It is about everything. Second. Third. A girl not placing fourth could miss the cut in future events.
Thank goodness judges have issued preliminary injunctions against Biden’s rewrite of Title IX in ten states: Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
U.S. District Court’s Eastern District of Kentucky, Northern Division Chief Judge Danny Reeves’ decision is long, but he could have stopped with his first sentence:
There are two sexes: male and female.
I will die on this hill.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
These boys must be so damn proud of their accomplishments. Beating up on girls. It makes me wonder what part their parents played, or didn’t play, in their upbringing. I also wonder what they will turn out to be in twenty years. What a bunch of losers.
These boys should have their asses beat by the real boys who should be sticking up for their girl friends. The adults clearly aren’t going to stop this crap…. a bet a few solid ass kickings would work wonders.
Pretty much everything Progressives foist on us could be handled by a few solid ass kickings.
I think it would be more effective to have the girls and boys teams make a prior arrangement before the race. When the signal goes off, the girls step out and the boys jump in. Then your pretender suddenly finds himself running against the boys teams.
Repeat the lesson as often as necessary.
Serial killers
The better question is what was the path our society chose in order to arrive at this particular place. Another overlooked question is who made the series of decisions about which direction at nearly every turn. Another is who enabled these decisions. Finally we should ask who consistently opposed these choices and acknowledge they at least didn’t assist in getting us here.
There are several decades worth of deliberate decisions,.choices made opportunities to act in opposition that some were on the wrong side of. Many of the same people NOW demand to bailed out from the foreseeable consequences of the choices they made despite ongoing opposition and warnings. Very often those warnings were given by the same folks who are told they must NOW clean up the mess created by others.
It starts with the SCOTUS.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix
>June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court held in Bostock v. Clayton County that sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII) encompasses discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and transgender status. 140 S. Ct. 1731, 1741, 590 U.S. ___, ___ (2020).
Though Title VII and Title IX are two distinct statutes, their statutory prohibitions against sex discrimination are similar, such that Title VII jurisprudence is frequently used as a guide to inform Title IX. See Manual, Chapters I, IV. Indeed, in the months following the Bostock decision, several federal courts have reached the same conclusion as to Title IX, holding that Title IX protects transgender students from discrimination on the basis of gender identity.
The DOJ and apparently some courts immediately hopped from protecting minority students from discrimination to discriminating against women.
The beginning was fools giving in to the seductive call of d/prog ideologies which collectively worked to disregard and/or reject the very real differences between women and men. The denigration of masculine virtues in favor of some make believe, emotive, if it feels good do it, relativistic BS is how we got here. Those who voted for this crap for decades and are NOW upset at what they wrought need to enhance in serious self reflection. Especially before they, ironically, call upon those who opposed this crap from the jump and have already been its victims to rush in to aid the very sort of folks who previously condemned them.
You can’t have a woke weirdo SCOTUS making bizarre rulings without Senate confirmation and Presidential Nomination, usually on multiple occasions. Can’t get to SCOTUS without rulings by judges on the inferior district courts and Appeals courts. By giving political support to the candidates who backed this crap they got elected into power to nominate, confirm judges who made the leftist rulings and importantly maintain majority public acceptance during the process of confirmation which was the last real shot to block the Cray Cray leftist rulings downstream of all that.
Allowing transgender (biological) males to compete against other males would satisfy the requirement for “non-discrimination.” Pretty sure “non-discrimination” just means they must be allowed to compete. Girls have long been welcome to participate in male sports. The reason why they don’t is because they’re not competitive when trying to make male-dominated teams. This is why Title IX effectively mandated the establishment of separate girls’ teams (although if there existed a school where girls had teams and boys did not, it would work to assure the boys had an opportunity to play as well). Even throwing trans athletes into the mix, the mandate of Title IX remains the same – non-discrimination. Trans males aren’t excluded from playing on boys’ teams. I should think that satisfies the requirements of Title IX. “Discrimination” would exist only if they weren’t allowed to play at all. If trans athletes can’t make the cut, they would suffer the same “discrimination” faced by all the other biological males who likewise fail to make the cut. The latter group isn’t then permitted to switch to the girls’ teams, why should the trans athletes be allowed to do so? (It’s obvious the trans athletes wouldn’t be competitive with other males. That is so either because they were never capable of competing with other boys, or they screwed up their own native ability by altering their bodies’ chemistry. Should girls suffer the consequences of the trans’ athletes’ own decisions concerning what to do with their own bodies? I think not.)
The boys are not the problem –
Its the adults who make these mentally ill boys think they are girls.
Its the adults who indulge these kids in delusional believes that you can cure a mental illness by making these kids believe they are something they are not.
Mommy and daddy are gonna build a trophy case in the living room because they are so proud of their little girl
Look at me! I got a Participation Trophy for beating a bunch of girls! Highlight of my so called life and that will be the pinnacle, bro. In 20yrs try to wow the guys with your high school glory beating girls at track. Pathetic
Tell me that as a guy in high school you wouldn’t have tried anything to get into the girls locker room
Where the “F” is the football team? They should beat the crap out of these twisted jerks. Chivalry is dead.
I don’t see or hear you beating the crap out of these twisted jerks. Why not?
Because he’s a pathetic keyboard-macho p-word who spends his days here flexing his manly man bona fides in front of a captive audience of equally pathetic losers. Howard is a sad little emasculated loser who says we’re a “nation of nancy boys” but conveniently dodged military service and sits here bloviating about the decline of moral fortitude etc to compensate for his self loathing and assorted other shortcomings in life.
“Because he’s a pathetic keyboard-macho p-word who spends his days here flexing his manly man bona fides in front of a captive audience of equally pathetic losers.”
Yet here you both are, day after day, clicking Submit on inane post after inane post.
If you choad-garglers don’t like it here, don’t let the doorknob hit ya where the good Lord split ya.
What the male athletes should do at a school is try out for every girls’ team. When the biological boys lock biological girls out of a school’s teams almost entirely, the message will be clear – allowing biological males to compete in girls’/womens’ sports will destroy girls’/womens’ sports. There is no stronger way to send this message than to demonstrate it.
My point exactly. A good punch in the chops will demonstrate that these head sissies should stay away from women’s sports.
Why don’t you get the party started, tough guy?
LOL. He’s mocking the demented system with his name. Is he just pretending to be French, too??
My youngest child graduated from high school 7-years ago. She, and her older sister, were both athletes. It is absolutely terrifying how crazy things have become in the reasonably short period of time since her graduation. At this rate of societal decay, I don’t even want think where we’ll be in another decade. Critics said Obergefell would usher in the destruction of normalcy in America. The farther we get from that judicial decision, the more the critics seem to be proven correct.
targa- you make a good point with your mention obergefell. Even though I am very conservative, I am in favor of gay marital statutes. – which puts me at odds with most conservatives.
That said, Obergefell was a terrible decision from every constitutional analysis. The legal rationale was such that it is constitutional for three and four party marriages, marrying cousins, marrying brothers and sisters, marrying minors, etc.
Obergefell, however you think about the concept of gay marriage, was a judicial decision which has the same (fatal) flaws as Roe v. Wade;, namely, that the subject of marriage, gay or otherwise, is not mentioned in the Constitution, which these judges supposedly swore to uphold.
They, like the court in Roe v. Wade, made up an entirely new, previously unknown and nonexistant, “constitutional” right to gay marriage.
The founders would have had anyone suggesting such a bizarre notion tarred and feathered, or worse…
Both Roe v Wade and Obergefell were terrible decisions totally devoid of any US constitutional principles.
Doesnt matter whether you are pro or anti gay marriage or pro or anti abortion, both decisions were terrible.
What about the Ninth Amendment?
The Constitution doesn’t enumerate our rights, it defends them. If you look to the Constitution for your rights, and presume that rights not enumerated do not exist, you’re making the error that some feared our courts would make – disallowing rights that weren’t enumerated. The Bill of Rights’ answer to that problem was the Ninth Amendment (and its preamble, that clearly states the BOR was only meant as a guarantee that Congress had no authority to break into any of our rights).
Maybe we should take.the opportunity to reflect on the question of govt being involved in marriage at all? Why not rely upon purely Ecclesiastical solutions? If there wasn’t a piece of govt paper or need to show that piece of paper to gain access to govt advantages reserved for those with that paper….we would likely be better off as a society.
The short answer is ‘taxes.’ Absent some kind of marital recognition by government, everything exchanged between spouses that exceeds $18K annually (or whatever the annual gift tax exemption is ATM), would be subject to taxation. It would be one of the largest cash-grabs in the history of the Republic and a bookkeeping nightmare for families all over this country.
All a gift to anyone that is larger than the annual exclusion does is require you to file a gift tax form and pay no taxes unless the amount exceeds your estate tax exclusion of now $13.6M. It does then reduce your estate tax exclusion. (I had to go through that routine when I gave a child the downpayment for a house, a typical example.)
I get what you’re saying. For many people, this is a non-issue. BUT, we are talking about spousal gifts and inheritances. Think about how many men die and have a total estate greater than $13M (I think that exclusion is decreasing again in a couple years, BTW). Normally, that estate passes from the decedent without any kind of taxation to the spouse. Absent that spousal exception, estate planners are going to have a surge in new business.
That argument presupposes a clear and convincing case be made and accepted for the existing preferential treatment for Spouses which you haven’t yet made. Why should spouses v a child, a nephew, niece or other inheriting heirs be especially privileged for purposes of estate tax?
For that matter why use the framework of an Estate tax instead of a straight forward inheritance tax of X % (no more 10% IMO) above a Y $ threshold amount received by each heir ($5M seems like an easy sell politically) so:
$100 million dollar to ten heirs in equal amounts would see a total of $50 M taxed at 10% for a total of $5 million and $500K per heir. Leave it all to a single heir, 50 heirs or whatever else but each heir taxed the same % above the $5M exclusion.
Even that is assuming the legitimacy of argument in favor of taxes on transferred assets at death (or gift taxes) which IMO are both flipping ridiculous. It requires a very intrusive system to implement, monitor, collect and audit while it strikes me and many others as inherently unfair to tax, yet again, assets that were already subjected to a lifetime of taxes.
“Why should spouses v a child, a nephew, niece or other inheriting heirs be especially privileged for purposes of estate tax?”
Well, ignoring the common law tax spousal tax exceptions that predate the founding of the country, the biggest reason we have them today is because marriage benefits the country. The premise of marriage (in the west) has long been: What is mine becomes yours and what is yours becomes mine, is undercut when the government steps in and says: Not so fast.
I consider them “cheaters”. IMO that is basic nature of the Democratic party. Nobody gets what they deserve based on merit, but based on what class they belong to, even if it means taking it away from someone else – as in this, or student loan forgiveness being paid by people who did not go to college, or in letting in illegals at the expense of benefits to Black Americans (Chicago), or jobs to those here legally.
Cheaters or THIEVES? One of them took a five thousand dollar win from the girls in swimming and if there was a collective brain in the people that awarded him, they would have taken it all away for the highest scoring REAL girl, plus fined him for his thievery.
“Cheaters or THIEVES?”
“and”
huh??
it says “males”
males dont play in female sports
orrrrrr
do they??
ahhahahahahahaa
the sinister plot thickens
Yes, and good for LI for doing so.
Now, if we could get them consistent enough to stop capitalizing blacks.
Thank you. I refuse to use transgender. I refuse to even say “biological male” or “biological female.” It’s male or female. That is it. No other choices.
is this male winning against women phenomenon happening in the sports where poc dominate???
CAUSE NOW THATTTTTTT would be interesting
what about at the professional levels??
and if no
why not!!????!?!?!??!
The power of one!
The power of two!
The power of many …. taxpayer-funded abortions on demand!
There – having chanted the sacred and magic words feminists politicians will now go back to looking the other way.
Without Roe v. Wade and such abortions, concentrated in Blacks, Hillary Clinton would certainly have won in 2016.
I am reminded of this quote from Mark Steyn:
Progressive will eventually run out of disciples because they kill so many of their own potential replacements and in general work tirelessly to nullify their own existence.
Just sick, sick, sick.
I’d like to know where are the people who wrote and passed Title VII (1964) and Title IX (1964, 1972) of the Civil Rights Act.
DOJ got hold of it and has been twisting it out of recognition. https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ix
On March 26, 2021, the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division issued a memorandum to federal civil rights offices and general counsels addressing the application of Bostock to Title IX, determining that Title IX’s prohibition on discrimination “on the basis of sex” includes discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation. See Letter from Pamela S. Karlan, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, to Federal Civil Rights Directors and General Counsels (Mar. 26, 2021), https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/correspondence/stakeholders/educator-202106-tix.pdf.
Why are these female athletes competing against males?
1. They think it’s fair
2. They think they can win
3. They don’t care if they lose
4. They are afraid to say anything
5. They are brainwashed and don’t know any better
6. They know men are from Mars & women are from Venus, but these males claim they’re from Venus
7. ___________________________________________________
Former elite runner here. Obligated to weight in. I’ve wondered what I would have done if this were in my era and I think that looking back I would have switched over to prove the point. There is a caveat: The problem is that for any male – the switch key holes them into a women’s scholarship- and the point of running elite at the college level is to run against the best. So it would be a career ender for most elite males to do this.
The only thing I loved more than winning was pissing people off. So the only quote I would have given on the subject is “compared to me, everyone runs like a girl.”
The people switching over are not elite. I recall that Lia Thomas was ranked something like 300 among male swimmers.
They don’t have to be to destroy female sports
“The people switching over are not elite”
Understood. If the elite males switched over to make a point, this would end faster than the elite male mile time.
So long as continues to be creepy would-be-school-shooters, it will go on unchecked.
Following up on Andy’s comment – I am currently a competitive cyclists, though no longer truely competitive due to my age (68). I also played collegiate volleyball albeit at a low tier in the mid to late 70’s.
As Andy noted, the elite runners (and most all athletes) want to compete against the best. In my case, I got much more enjoyment playing hard and competitively losing against the better teams than beating a lesser team. That rule is generally true for all competitive athletes.
Are the Woke yet seeing any male can beat top females in sports yet?
The courts are part of the government. They are not going to save us.
Merit is being destroyed. Just look at UCLA med school. They do it because they can and we tolerate it. You can’t vote your way out of this.
That’s because the cause of gay marriage was argued by dull, unimaginative attorneys, whose go-to argument is always “it’s a constitutional right.” I’m a little ‘l” libertarian constitutionalist with conservative tendencies. I support gay marriage because I can’t see any foundation, in either the Constitution or the constitution of any state, for state discrimination against gay couples to prevent them from benefitting from civil marriages as do straight couples. That is to say, I am aware of no State that has the authority to confer marriage selectively on people because of their sex or sexual orientation. Indeed, I believe the state should have no role in marriage, and that all civil marriages should be based on private contracts that elucidate the responsibilities and obligations of the parties involved. The state should have no business in the matter. Divorces would take place in civil courts and/or with arbitration, like any other contractual dispute.
I much prefer the “no authority” argument to the “constitutional right” argument in many situations, because the latter requires the claimant to prove something, while the former puts the state on the defensive, placing the onus on the state to cite its authority. (Once you know their claimed authority it may be necessary to then dismantle it with your own arguments. But the state does so much it’s not authorized to do that most of their arguments for authority are usually surprisingly weak, appearing as legal Rube Goldberg machines of dubious engineering.)
the government over the people agenda is now in control of the usa
san fran chicago etc might get all the big attention with their encampments
and 3rd world embraces
but its the smaller towns ( under 500k) that have also capitulated as the local governments give corporations welfare etc
and have gone woke also fearing the lawlessness that has spilled over from their big city neighbors
this is all ties in to their school systems and how your children are being indoctrinated…acceptance of males in females bathrooms etc
you allowed the gop to continue empowering the lefty
I suspect that the day is coming soon when biological females will simply stop competing. What will be left are males competing as females.
I would also recommend that HR departments keep track of these false female competitors. If they will cheat to get a sports trophy, what says that they will not cheat to either get ahead in your company OR cheat to betray your company for profit? As the twig is bent, so it grows.
Subotai Bahadur
So your saying that the best person for the job is still a male? At least in sports is sure is. There is a reason outside of Little League females do not compete with males. Once that hormone wall is hit it’s all over on the field but it seems that those radicles in charge want to subject our kids to their ideology and to hell with the cost.
Move over Mary, that hill you want to die on will become crowded.
However, it won’t be necessary for you to die on it Just males in female sport will die.
That dude from Maine competing in the woman’s 800 meter is …slow.AF. I was interested (I ran the 800 in HS) so I just pulled the Alabama time sheets for the ’24 Track and Field State Finals. His time of 2:19.72 wouldn’t get him better than 4th in the Women’s 6A classification and was good for 9th in the Woman’s 7A classification. He wouldn’t have qualified for the Mens finals in 4A, 5A, 6A or 7A. Each had 24 runners and all with far better times. Can’t believe that slow ass time would be good for 19th at the Mens Maine 800 finals. I know Maine has a smaller population to draw talent from but dayum that’s far slower than I would have believed to qualify for any State Final.
Of course, even against girls, you have to be fairly fast. Not me.
I was so slow,
((How slow were you?))
I was so slow, when I put down a bunt along the third base line, the third baseman got an unassisted putout. (Think about it)
I was so slow,
((etc))
I got thrown out at first on a ground ball to left field.
I was so slow,
((ditto))
I hit a ground ball to the pitcher, and he was 3/2 on the next batter before I reached first.
I was so slow,
((never mind))
I got thrown out at first on a home run.
I was so slow,
(())
when I tried to steal second, the pitcher had already struck out the next batter.
We had a guy on our HS and Babe Ruth baseball teams that was…. large. Dude could launch the ball though …when he could hit it (sucker for a curve). Base running was definitely not high in his skill set. If he didn’t hit what would be double for anyone else he almost always got thrown out at first. Dude played JUCO and some single A for a couple years.
It’s a blast watching Oscar Wilde’s famous dictum of “Sometimes getting what you want is worse than not getting it” come around and totally bite the feminists in the posterior! Pretty soon, all those precious hard-won Title IX womens scholarships, and the academic free rides that go with them, will be going to biological males! Congratulations ladies, you brought the Ts into the big tent and they will soon be pushing your daughters back outside! HEH
Leave a Comment