In Latest Blow to Military Effectiveness, U.S. Navy Will No Longer Require Sailors to Pass Physical Fitness Tests
Old standard forcing sailors out after 2 failed PT tests rescinded; Navy claims new rule has nothing to do with recruiting challenges

It has long been the case that U.S. Navy officers and sailors were required to pass twice-yearly physical fitness tests consisting of core (sit-ups, or more recently, forearm plank), upper body (pushups), and cardiovascular endurance (1.5 mile run or other equivalent cardio) testing.
Until recently, sailors had two chances to pass the PT test, but after that, they were forced out—not immediately, but forced out in the sense that they would no longer be allowed to re-enlist or be promoted, so they would eventually be forced to separate from active duty, in most cases short of their 20-year retirement eligibility.
But now that is all changed.
Military.com has the story: Sailors Who Fail 2 Consecutive Fitness Tests Will No Longer Face the End of Their Career, Navy Says:
Sailors who fail two consecutive fitness assessments will no longer automatically have their Navy careers brought to an end, according to a new service policy unveiled this week.
Under the old system, sailors who failed one physical fitness assessment, or PFA, lost their ability to be promoted until they were able to pass another test, but their careers would largely proceed onward. However, failing another consecutive PFA would end a career by taking away the ability to be promoted or to reenlist.
The Navy will now allow those career-ending actions to come at the discretion of a sailor’s commanding officer instead of a fleet-wide mandate, the service said in an administrative message explaining the new policy that was sent out Tuesday.
I can tell you that as a former Commanding Officer of an operational attack submarine, constantly dealing with manning shortages, that it would have been awfully tempting to let a sailor slide on their PT test results, rather than losing that person, especially if we were soon departing on deployment.
And that’s not the only benefit for sailors under the new program.
Military.com continues:
“Commanding officers can now evaluate a sailor’s physical readiness progress or lack of progress in performance evaluations, giving them the ability to manage risk, recognize earnest effort, and best take care of their people,” Vice Adm. Rick Cheeseman, the chief of naval personnel, said in the administrative message.
The new policy says sailors who fail any PFA no longer have to have it noted on their annual evaluation — though they still lose their advancement eligibility until they are able to pass another test.
Dropping this requirement means that sailors who fail once are not necessarily forced to address it when applying for programs where their evaluations are considered, which in turn keeps them more competitive.
Meanwhile, enlisted sailors who fail their second consecutive PFA are no longer required to receive the lowest possible score in the “Military Bearing/Professionalism” category and to be denied the ability to reenlist.
Retention “eligibility for enlisted members will be at the discretion of the CO,” the memo says. In exercising that discretion, commanders should consider a sailor’s “qualification for continued service,” “their overall ability to contribute to Navy missions,” and “the likelihood of improvement in meeting PFA standards within the next 12 months.”
[emphasis added]
Not having a failed PT test noted on a sailor’s annual evaluation is HUGE: This means promotion boards might now be promoting sailors to leadership ranks and positions who are fat and out-of-shape. Who cares, I guess.
And why the big push now to drop the “get in shape or get out” requirement? Does it have anything to do with the Navy’s abysmal recruiting (“U.S. Navy, Faced with Recruiting Nightmare, Begins Accepting High School Dropouts“) and retention numbers? Of course not!
The change, according to the message, is part of the Navy’s push to revamp its culture of leadership and service and is an effort to modernize “our PFA policy to acknowledge our diverse population, increase sailor trust, and enhance quality of service.”
I’m not sure if this new policy enhances the “quality” of a sailor’s service when they suffer no ill-consequences of being fat and out-of-shape to the point of not being required to pass the PT test (twice).
And what does it mean that the new policy “acknowledges” the Navy’s “diverse population”? Are they saying that minority sailors can’t pass the PT test? Sounds pretty racist to me.
And, while the previous policy might seem a bit onerous, it has already been loosened up over the years in a number of significant ways:
It is the latest in a series of changes to the fitness test that has come in recent years.
In February, the sea service announced that it was resetting the counter on PFA failures fleet-wide, enabling up to 1,500 sailors to keep serving.
In November, the Navy decided to ditch a postpartum PFA that new mothers would typically be expected to take less than a year after giving birth.
Ever since emerging from the restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Navy has also kept to the pandemic-era change of conducting only one PFA per year instead of two. Tuesday’s message also continues this trend into 2025.
Think about what that means: if the PT test is only given once a year, even under the old policy sailors had two years to get in shape if they were overweight. All they had to do was avoid failing two tests in a row. How hard can that be? You can’t put the donuts down for two years? WTF?
And of course, the Navy made even more excuses for the new policy:
Critics have argued that many of the changes were the Navy relaxing its standards in the face of a challenging recruiting environment and an increasingly overweight population of Americans.
Officials in Cheeseman’s office, however, provided data to Military.com in November that showed the number of sailors failing PFAs had remained very low.
So what? That doesn’t address the question. Why now?
I’m so disgusted by the current state of the U.S. military, and the Navy in particular, I’m not sure how I’m even continuing to post military updates anymore. Ucch.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
USN’s Meal Team 6,
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0d4cad085be7dcc4baef28041dfee818f53b55f7a4b15940c5db63d3fa1f98a4.jpg
Let’s apply it to medical students who fail their medical exams but display “earnest effort.”
Have you seen the stories about UCLA Medical School the last few months? They’re already doing this…to satisfy their DEI initiatives.
Things are so bad, even The Atlantic is writing about it…The ATLANTIC.
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2024/06/ucla-woke-medical-school-dei/678606/
The US Medical Licensing Exams are now pass-fail. They used to be scored and very relevant in applying for residencies. But now students can almost-fail and it’s just as good as being in the top 10%.
What do you call a doctor who is the lowest one in his graduation class?
Answer: Doctor
I call him “ boy.”
I want a doctor that is at least 50yrs old. Don’t care color, sex or where they are from. Younger ones, no thank you
Likewise, although maybe 40 if it’s absolutely necessary.
.
Real Social Justice would be a supreme court justice who promoted affirmative action wheeled into an operating room for heart surgery and for the doctor to say,” Hi I’m your biggest fan. I was a pothead in high school and a drunk in college and if it weren’t for affirmative action programs I would have never gotten into or through med school or been considered for this job. So, just relax, and I’ll be doing your heart surgery.”
Navy claims new rule has nothing to do with recruiting challenges
Uh-huh. “Nothing to do with recruiting challenges. Riiiiight.
They just spew the most obvious lies now while thinking no one will stop them. Unfortunately, they seem to be correct. Orwell saw it coming.
I agree. The ability to tag this action with a DEI sticker may just be cover for recruitment issues the Navy would rather not admit it’s having. The fact those issues can be papered over with virtue signaling is just icing on the cake.
Good lord, that looks like people trying to keep their org chart full, without caring too much with what.
Hey Taiwan Philippines Israel Australia Africa: South Korea and everywhere else:
America is sending you a message loud and clear:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ka1wkXjeEz8&pp=ygUhQmxhemluZyBzYWRkbGVzIHlvdXJlIG9uIHlvdXIgb3du
You’re on your own.
While the ht/wt standards are sometimes asinine the actual physical fitness tests are not. I had an NCO who I had write up every time we did a ht/wt screening. The guy was by the book ‘overweight’ at 6’1 225 but wasn’t fat, dude was built like a tank and maxed out his physical fitness tests. Downplaying the significance of a PT test failure is Cray Cray. Morale is going to suffer and good solid troops are gonna either get out in disgust or start slacking off b/c why bother if it is no longer a priority.
Similar thing happened to an acquaintance back in my active Air Force days (late 70s). Built like a bulldog, but technically overweight & forced out.
And your good, solid troops are going to get out; they have too much self-respect to slack off.
Might as well dock the ships, park the tanks and ground the aircraft. We no longer have a military.
Happened to me but I was not forced out. My BMI was over the max allowed due to my weight training. That I ran a 4:20 mile and The All American Marathon didn’t matter. Took my Top, a 101 Airborne Vietnam Vet who backed down from nobody, to step up and come to my defense. The Brigade Commander just said OK after he showed up.
Top was funny but a hard man reminding me of my Grandfather who went onto Omaha. No one wanted a piece of him. Jeez, 40yrs ago and I’m laughing remembering him running over every officer in sight.
If you’re old enough to remember the Carter Administration, everything that’s happening right now look eerily familiar; inflation, anemic growth, unending foreign policy failures and a military that is broken, fat and on drugs.
I was just old enough to start being interested in politics. Yeah I remember. I also remember the pendulum swinging back the other direction, and what we got after Carter. Dare we hope?
The pendulum isn’t swinging so much as it’s returning to the center. Why? Demographics. In 1980, Reagan won 56% of the white vote and that produced a 489 Electoral Vote landslide, one of the three or four biggest victories of the last 100-years. He only lost 6-states. In 2020, Trump won (at least) 58% of white voters….and still ‘lost’ the election, winning only 232 EVs and half the states.
Most polls project Trump winning between 56% and 58% of the white vote again this year. Even if he has a significant improvement with Black & Latino voters, it’s still going to be a razor-thin margin in the popular vote and at best, he can win 300(ish) Electoral Votes. As the white vote continues to erode – as it has been for the last 30-years – it will become increasingly difficult for GOP candidates to win, unfortunately. The 20th Century cycles where America saw HUGE swings of the ideological pendulum from one party and then back to the other, are likely over for the foreseeable future…because of racial division.
Of course Reagan didn’t have to deal with widespread cheating and fraud–as we’ve been doing now since at least 2020. I predict it’ll be worse in 2024.
He probably did, actually, it just wasn’t enough. Recall what the Democrats did to Nixon. They’ve been doing it for a very long time.
You can thank Zero for making the race issue 1000x worse.
I’m old enough that I served during the tail end of the Ford administration and through most of the Carter administration. A bad time for having aspirations of a military career. I was crushed by what I found (in the Army) and had to leave to prevent my brain from eating itself.
It all started coming apart with the Tailhook Scandal. Men were no longer welcome.
I wonder if Captain (retired) Nault shares your apparent belief that punishing sailors’ drunkenness and sexual assault was an error.
and the “solution” from the lefty???
make the military more female
so they punished america
It shouldn’t have become necessary for the Left — or anyone else outside the navy — to deal with drunken sailors who damaged property and committed sexual assault.
?
those who broke the law need to be punished
that punishment should not have extended to making america weaker
More female? More like more feminine.
.
This is the worst scandal of the navy.
I would have been correctly removed if I had failed.
The U.S. Navy has never had trouble finding enough recruits prior to going woke and frankly the amount of trust you have to have in the navy is enough that I don’t blame the young men who see what the navy is telling them and say “F U”.
Instead of allowing people who have no business being anywhere near the navy in they should be asking to go back to equality.
The physical requirements are there for very good reasons.
The PRT is not difficult to pass, even for out of shape and even obese sailors, so I get the objection to the change in policy (and the contention that this has nothing to do with recruiting woes is transparently BS), but the Navy has had a strained relationship with physical fitness for as long as I can remember.
When I was in “A” school almost 50 years ago, they were only using height vs weight as the determining factor on who was “out of shape”, they hadn’t fully instituted their (inaccurate as heck) body fat measurement system yet. One of my friends in school (he was actually one of the groomsmen in my wedding) was a competitive power lifter. He was only about 5’6″ tall but was built like a brick sh1thouse and was solid muscle. His biceps were literally the size of my thighs (ask me sometime about trying to get a tux tailored for him for the wedding…that was an adventure). He was always on mandatory PT (physical training) because he was “overweight”. He was good-natured about it. He always said the hour of mandatory calisthenics every morning was a good warm up for his real work out.
On the other end, my brother ended up getting out of the Navy not because he couldn’t pass the PRT, but because he got tired of constantly having to fight to keep his body fat under the limit.
He legitimately has had a weight problem most of his life. He took after our mom and some (if not most) of his weight issues are just genetic and metabolic. He struggled with it for years to stay in the Navy, but promotions were slow and he got tired of struggling with it so he got out as an E-5 after 12 years in.
He was an Electronics Tech who specialized in secure communications and easily secured a six figure income job with AT&T as a network engineer before the ink was dry on his DD214 (this was back when a six figure income was still a lot of money…easily twice what he was making in the Navy).
The Navy isn’t infantry. Reasonable physical fitness is important for safety and emergency response on board ships for sure, but a Secure Comms tech doesn’t need to be a world-class athlete to be able to design, build and maintain a secure communications network.
If your task is to provide an effective, secure, reliable and redundant communications network would you rather have the best comms tech that’s 30 pounds overweight or a marginal tech who looks like Adonis? I know what my answer would be.
At that time the Navy disagreed. AT&T was happy to have him.
Apparently times are changing.
Stand Navy out to sea, fat! our battle cry!
This is the logical result of allowing women to serve in combat roles.
Lowering standards, DEI, affirmative action will all bring in our demise.
The days of Wooden Ships and Iron men are long past. Now it’s kind of the opposite. Apparently expectations are being set appropriately to what’s available.
How much load can a ship carry before capsizing? Depends on how many sailors are on board.
Total displacement of a navy vessel + weight of the crew = total displacement. These days the crew is the heavier part.
Stumbling mumbling biden, international symbol of weakness. I feel sorry for americans serving in biden’s military.
“hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times”
Where does everyone think we are at? My wife and I were talking about this the other day in reference to one of her kids. Her and I are the last generation that remembers being raised by and knowing The Greatest Generation. We never realized how special they were until too late. Every year we go home on vacation and I visit my Grandfathers grave with the Military Stone and PFC WW2 inscription then go to the VFW Post that has his name and many others I knew as a kid on the wall as a founding member. Great men, all of them.
Back then — We had leaders to lead the fighting men.
Starting with FDR and George C. Marshall; Chester Nimitz, Hap Arnold, others (obviously)
Those leaders have been gone for 50+ years, and nobody really remembers them.
But they had to make many many decisions — some that are easy to second-guess years later — but they were the ones imho who really won that war.
(Along with those 20,000,000 Russians.)
Just my opinion, as the son of a long-gone WWII combat vet.
Don’t agree?
I take no offense. It’s all good.
Several of my uncles (on my mother’s side – a large family) served in WW II. I didn’t really know what that meant when I was a kid, but after my own service and 50+ years of reading about the war it now makes me furious to have some understanding of what they sacrificed and risked only to have our nation become what it is today.
What do whales and sailors have in common?
They’re both filled with blubber. Whereas the focus used to be on “Save the whales,” it’s now on “Save the sailors.”
I wonder if the tiny and short CNO must do the PT test?
What U.S. Navy regulations must be met, for the Commander In Chief to be keelhauled?
Hopefully the USN doesn’t relax the strict requirement for correct pronoun usage and gendering of superior officers.
Life Approaches Art.
Meanwhile, the NY Times reported recently that “ Congress is weighing proposals to update mandatory conscription, including by expanding it to women for the first time and automatically registering those eligible to be called up.”
They noted “ the idea of adding women to the draft has for years run into a brick wall of opposition among conservative Republicans, and at least one G.O.P. Senate candidate is seeking to use the issue to attack his Democratic opponent.”
The Times, inexplicably quoting Cardi B, who may know about WAP and such, said “These new kids? You want to send these new kids to fight these wars?”
“All I want to say is to America is: Good luck with that.”
Oh oh, I smell trouble ahead, trouble with a capital T.
How can you add women to the draft without first deciding what a woman is?
Meh. It is past time that every 18 year old was subject to selective service requirements. Either we believe in basic equality for both the privileges of Citizenship and the duties of Citizenship or we don’t. IMO, we should leave the penalties in place for refusing to register with selective service but include women AND enforce the penalties at age 19; no federal jobs, no student loans and so on for failure to register. Allow folks to choose not to do so but make sure there is a price to their failure instead of turning a blind eye. For that matter ensure everyone under full SSI retirement age has registered and suffer penalties of they don’t; no student loans(existing loans called in) no federally backed mortgage, no federal jobs and so on.
All these arguments about women being conscripted into the infantry and being handed a bayonet to form the all female Valkyrie Brigade and conduct a bayonet charge are BS. There are plenty of non combat roles women are perfectly capable of performing which in turn frees up the men who would otherwise have to do those jobs to instead serve in the pure Combat MOS of Infantry. Armor, Field Artillery.
You could be right about this one. The mottivation is right, and it plays out well, at least as a thought experiment.
People get way more concerned about military adventurism if they might end up in the crosshairs. Plenty of gasping heads among the chattering class all wee-wee’d up about “provoking a nuclear power” in Ukraine are really just freaked to realize that they, themselves might be at risk.
In the immortal words of Joe Biden: “Hey fat!”
Next up: “Navy no longer requires sailors to know how to swim.”
just saw that
posted the same!!
no real need to swim when your in the navy
ahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhaaaa
I think the wnba could beat up the usa military
so kust liek the afirmaction
doctors lawyers pilots etc etc
you will get the pay and ALLLL THE HONORS but you really dont have the actual meritable skills
but if you dont say “dr.’ or ilot etc
you will go to jail
its a coming
correction:
so just like the affirmaction
how come submarines are equipped with private restrooms/showers etc for women
BUT MALES ARE ALLOWED TO SHARE RESTROOMS/SHOWERS in the public sphere
I’ve never been well muscled. This caused problems on paper off-and-on while in the AF and AirNG because I’ve never been able to keep up with so many others doing pushups and pullups but I got past the PT requirements since I could run with the best of them. I never had trouble doing my job, which included picking up and moving the attack radar modulator-receiver-transmitter for the F-111 aircraft, a unit that (IIRC) weighed around a hundred pounds, when bench testing in the shop. Nor was there a problem with reconfiguring the camera suite in the nose of an RF-4C.
.
Standards? What standards?
It has nothing to do with failure to meet recruiting goals just like lowering the standards in previous years had nothing to do with increasing women in all of the Services.
I served 21 years in the Marine Corps as an infantry officer with 3 years in combat. My first job out of college was as a Marine platoon commander in Vietnam 1969. I absolutely guarantee that except for women who were cross-fit professionals or Olympic athletes could have survived the mental and physical stresses in Vietnam. The physical loads (ammo was more important than food) were heavy and the terrain made it many times worse. There there was no sneaking into the bushes to relieve yourself. You did where you stood. Diseases and infections were a constant problem as well as diarrhea, leeches, ring worm, and lack of resupply in those days. Water was always a problem because there was no such thing as bottled water. We filled canteens with whatever was available but during the monsoon season rain water was the best..
The services can make all of the excuses they want to cover the fact that they are lowering standards because they can’t recruit. They done it for decades.
When I was in the Navy (’70s-’80s) the PT test was something of a joke. Maybe it’s tougher now, but I doubt it. I was hardly what you would call an athlete but I never had any trouble with it.
The body fat measurements were pretty useless; as others have noted a trained athlete could be out of specs while a dough-bellied Chief would pass.
I agree with having a physical fitness requirement, but it should be reasonable. Testing should be related to one’s job or what one might be called on to do under battle conditions.
For instance, unlike in WWII German U-Boats, we don’t require submariners to run to the front of the sub for a crash dive, and even if we did, who would running a mile and a half be a relevant test for submariners?
[need and edit function]
‘even if we did, HOW would running a mile and a half be a relevant test for submariners?”