Image 01 Image 03

White House Plans to Ease Restrictions on Marijuana

White House Plans to Ease Restrictions on Marijuana

The shift in marijuana classification could also be a lifeline for California’s struggling pot industry.

While polls are not to be trusted, they can be at least entertaining and sometimes align with observed realities. Take, for example, a recent poll that looked at Biden’s support among young Americans.

His support in that demographic has gone up in smoke.

In the 2020 election, around 60 percent of people ages 18-29 voted for the Democrat.

But according to a Harvard Youth Poll released earlier this month, Biden’s support among this age group has now declined, with 45 percent of 18-29 year olds planning to vote for him. While this is still more than the 37 percent who say they will vote for Trump, this shows Biden’s support among the youth has significantly declined.

This collapse has occurred after a myriad of actions to executive order away student loan debt.

It’s time for a new approach. Now the White House is planning to ease restrictions on marijuana.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration will move to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, The Associated Press has learned, a historic shift to generations of American drug policy that could have wide ripple effects across the country.

The proposal, which still must be reviewed by the White House Office of Management and Budget, would recognize the medical uses of cannabis and acknowledge it has less potential for abuse than some of the nation’s most dangerous drugs. However, it would not legalize marijuana outright for recreational use.

The agency’s move, confirmed to the AP on Tuesday by five people familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive regulatory review, clears the last significant regulatory hurdle before the agency’s biggest policy change in more than 50 years can take effect.

Marijuana would be classified as a Schedule III drug rather than a Schedule 1 substance. However, there are still many restrictions on Schedule III material.

Schedule III drugs — which include ketamine, anabolic steroids and some acetaminophen-codeine combinations — are still controlled substances.

They’re subject to various rules that allow for some medical uses, and for federal criminal prosecution of anyone who traffics in the drugs without permission.

No changes are expected to the medical marijuana programs now licensed in 38 states or the legal recreational cannabis markets in 23 states, but it’s unlikely they would meet the federal production, record-keeping, prescribing and other requirements for Schedule III drugs.

There haven’t been many federal prosecutions for simply possessing marijuana in recent years, even under marijuana’s current Schedule I status, but the reclassification wouldn’t have an immediate impact on people already in the criminal justice system.

“Put simple, this move from Schedule I to Schedule III is not getting people out of jail,” said David Culver, senior vice president of public affairs at the U.S. Cannabis Council.

However, the sound-bite is good, and Biden may think this is a smooth and suave play for the youth vote.

‘I think he’s probably grasping at straws in terms of how he’s going to appeal to younger people across the country,’ Sen. Mike Braun, R-Ind., told DailyMail.com.

‘They grab on to this or that to see if they can kind of bolster some of the support they’ve lost,’ he continued. ‘It is peculiar that they look at it right now. And to me, that’s probably mostly politically motivated.’

Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, agreed, telling DailyMail.com, ‘I assume everything is an election year gimmick.’

However, it may be a lifeline to a state that massively supports Biden – California. The move helps the struggling pot industry deal with the tax repercussions of selling a Schedule I material.

The tax burden, though, has been particularly onerous. Section 280E of the federal tax code bars businesses involved in “trafficking” of Schedule I or II substances from deducting the expenses they incur. As a result, they are taxed on every dollar they collect, not just their profits.

But if marijuana is reclassified as a Schedule III drug, “players in that industry for the first time will be able to take standard tax deductions that other businesses take,” said Paul Armentano, deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, also known as NORML, which advocates for cannabis consumers. “The biggest change is going to be how the industry does business.”

“The industry in California especially has been faltering in the last couple of years and this offers them a future,” Manzuri said. “It might be a lifeline that they need to continue operating.”

If Biden wins in November, the pot business may be one of the few growth industries that will exist. Who wants to go through another term of Biden completely sober?

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

E Howard Hunt | May 3, 2024 at 7:10 am

This should make it easier for Hunter to visit.

Halcyon Daze | May 3, 2024 at 7:22 am

Deck chairs and Titanic and something something.

    MattMusson in reply to Halcyon Daze. | May 3, 2024 at 8:53 am

    The White House is clearly pandering for votes. But, will the Democrat base be too stoned to show up at the polls?

      Whitewall in reply to MattMusson. | May 3, 2024 at 10:18 am

      Spread word among the young that on Wed. Nov 6th they can come for free pot and vote at the same time. After voting, free tacos will be available to ease the munchies.

        Paul in reply to Whitewall. | May 3, 2024 at 1:38 pm

        I’m pretty sure Biden*’s Stasi threw a guy in jail for something like this… sending out a text-message of similar sort in the run up to the 2016 election.

      I doubt it will make much difference. One thing the WH and Congress should do is allow banks to handle weed money in states where it is legal. The whole cash business with the corresponding tax evasion and criminality (robbery, theft, etc.), makes no sense.

      henrybowman in reply to MattMusson. | May 3, 2024 at 2:33 pm

      “too stoned to show up at the polls?”
      Show up at the where? Why?
      That’s what DROPBOXES are for, Mr. Natural!
      Stoned Soul Voting!

      diver64 in reply to MattMusson. | May 3, 2024 at 7:47 pm

      Not if Republicans hand out free bags of Doritos

    SeiteiSouther in reply to Halcyon Daze. | May 3, 2024 at 10:40 am

    Exactly what I was thinking. They at grasping at straws.

Wow, man! Election year!

Ghostrider | May 3, 2024 at 8:14 am

A general election year before us, it is. The light needs believers to succeed. Do. Or do not. There is no try. In the end, cowards are those who follow the dark side.

2016 – A New Hope
2020 – The Empire Strikes Back
2024 – The Return of the Jedi

AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | May 3, 2024 at 8:15 am

What difference does it make?

The Biden Administration is helmed by a knock off Cheech and Chong character who goes through life stoned, incoherent, and vacuous.

“Who’s there?”

“Hunter.”

“Hunter’s not here, man!”

“No, dad, it’s Hunter!”

“Hunter’s not here, man!”

Fade to pResident walking aimlessly around the room, trying to shake hands with people who don’t exist.

The Gentle Grizzly | May 3, 2024 at 8:40 am

Oh, this is terrible! There will be addicts everywhere!

-sigh-

I need a drink…

“Bread and circuses” is now “pot and riots.”

Is this the return to normal that Biden et al. promised?

The central argument of those who advocate the decriminalization of marijuana is that it will reduce crime. Is there any empirical evidence that supports this theory? Have there been any unintended consequences realized in states that have decriminalized and/or legalized recreational marijuana? Have traffic injuries or fatalities in those states increased or decreased?

I understand the small-government argument that says government shouldn’t be able to criminalize a literal weed. But, does that mean government has to endorse and facilitate the sale of that weed and the processing of that weed into other products, like edibles? If people want to legalize the home-growing of their own weed solely for their own use, that’s one thing. But, enabling and even incentivizing industrial production and commercial sale of marijuana and THC-infused products is going to be disastrous, if it isn’t already.

    Dimsdale in reply to TargaGTS. | May 3, 2024 at 9:28 am

    It will only reduce crime if it is decriminalized. Lefty judges will just free the pothead criminals, who will use the Ted Kennedy defense when they kill people using vehicles.

    The left doesn’t need evidence: it makes it up or ignores it. See: Pres. Trump.

    henrybowman in reply to TargaGTS. | May 3, 2024 at 2:43 pm

    “Is there any empirical evidence that supports this theory?”
    Yes.
    Canada spent $2 billion on a national firearms registry, which they maintained for nearly two decades.
    Throughout its entire lifetime, its data proved 100% useless for solving firearms crimes… EXCEPT for the new synthetic crime of “failure to register,” a crime created solely by the existence of the registry itself.
    When Canada finally scrapped this “law enforcement tool,” gun crime unquestionably decreased.

No it absolutely won’t help the quasi-legal cannabis sector in state like CA. Because the licensed growers will still be undercut on price by the unlicensed growers. The unlicensed growers are paying zero tax, so there’s “more love on the scale” for customers.

Yup, free pot, free viagra, free abortions equals a population of idiots. That’s the goal

    smooth in reply to Gersh204. | May 3, 2024 at 11:16 am

    CA actually gives homeless junkies free medical cannabis to help them with their “cravings”. Even though there is no documented evidence that it helps step them down from abusing other substances like fentanyl or meth. Paid for by CA taxpayers.

drsamherman | May 3, 2024 at 11:05 am

Let me just add this from a medical perspective:

A) THCs, the pharmacologically active constituents of Cannabis sativa (and some other plants) have a mixed history in medical literature—some studies proving a benefit, others proving a harm, and others saying equivocal results. Overall, most physicians don’t really see any medicinal benefit except in certain narrow circumstances (it is approved for improving appetite in chemotherapy, cachexia, etc.) and already is in Schedule III.

B) People often think Schedule III does not indicate high potential for abuse. Just a historical note: Vicodin (hydrocodone/acetaminophen combination) was Schedule III until moved to Schedule II because of its high abuse potential. Benzodiazepines (Valium, Klonopin, Ativan, Xanax) are all Schedule IV. While the language of the law says “lower potential for abuse”, the purpose of the Schedule III/IV language really was to allow for refills of prescriptions for patients using these medications for pain management, anxiety, etc. We know better now—these drugs are very commonly abused. So, don’t let the terminology of Schedule III/IV confuse you. They all have high potential for abuse.

    healthguyfsu in reply to drsamherman. | May 3, 2024 at 2:07 pm

    Epilepsy and glaucoma but the former is more CBD than THC.

    There is definitely a lot more hype than substance on the medical benefits.

    Ask a pothead and they will list of over a dozen things that it’s “cured”…maybe 1 is true.

      drsamherman in reply to healthguyfsu. | May 3, 2024 at 3:52 pm

      The glaucoma data is limited to very, very refractory cases and has always been a “last resort” authorization by FDA (for legally prescribed patients) prior to the states individually acting. Overall, the evidence was equivocal. For epilepsy, it’s a very narrow form, and is approved under the name Epidiolex (and some others), and hell, now that CBD can be had over mail order, almost doesn’t mean anything. What a world….

    Gamereg in reply to drsamherman. | May 3, 2024 at 10:33 pm

    Stupide question: Why are drug classifications called “schedules”?

destroycommunism | May 3, 2024 at 11:34 am

one way or another

the left will mind control the masses to achieve the goal

of the physical takeover

destroycommunism | May 3, 2024 at 11:37 am

THEN AGAINNNN

why isnt there a trade-off of we dont have to pay for others healthcare!!!?

why do we accept the socialist concept of life when its already been PROVEN

that we are NOT OUR BROTHERS KEEPERS

“However, it may be a lifeline to a state that massively supports Biden – California. ”

If China Joe* needs to shore up support in California, he’s in deep trouble.

“Section 280E of the federal tax code bars businesses involved in “trafficking” of Schedule I or II substances from deducting the expenses they incur. As a result, they are taxed on every dollar they collect, not just their profits.”

Why? Is it a legitimate business expense or not?

This is the sort of BS that drives me crazy about our tax code. Enabling the govt to put their thumb on the scale, for whatever reason.

    destroycommunism in reply to Gosport. | May 3, 2024 at 12:52 pm

    and thats why

    it drives those of us who believe in common sense and not emotion to set the laws

    that the left keeps their body weight on the scales as to shut us down in the

    “you cant fight city hall” mantra they love so much to push onto us

    henrybowman in reply to Gosport. | May 3, 2024 at 2:47 pm

    Well, according to the feds, MJ is still “illegal” regardless of what a state thinks, so the business selling it is not legitimate either.

destroycommunism | May 3, 2024 at 12:48 pm

Since the newest criminal defense is

“mental health issues”

what could be better than getting people more mental health issues as the courts will accept that pot has a negative affect on mental health ( on some peolpe they will add as to not affect their pro pot agenda)

so that blmplo axe murderer will be sent to a pot detox clinic ( run by lefty approved pro black nationalist “doctors”) as opposed to real prisons

which will be inhabited by mostly political prisoners that dont comply to lefty policies

(see dc jails for jan6 trespassers for proof)