Image 01 Image 03

To Save Cornell, Ditch DEI

To Save Cornell, Ditch DEI

My Op-Ed in The NY Post: “The July 2020 DEI initiative was a colossal mistake that cannot be tweaked around the edges. It must be removed wholesale, weeded out root and branch.”

Cornell University President Martha Pollack is “retiring” unexpectedly (i.e. resigning) at the end of June, after a year of turmoil that landed Cornell in the headlines in a bad way.

I wrote about the resignation including my Statement:

“Martha Pollack was the architect of Cornell’s disastrous race-focused DEI initiative that balkanized the campus, and inevitably led to targeting of Jewish and pro-Israel students. While I wish her well in her personal life, it is time for the Cornell Trustees to turn the ship around, to eliminate DEI programming as is taking place elsewhere, and to refocus the campus on the inherent dignity of each individual without regard to group-identity.”

I had a chance to expand on the resignation and the way forward for Cornell in an Op-Ed in The New York Post, President Martha Pollack is quitting but to save Cornell, ditch DEI.

Cornell University President Martha Pollack just unexpectedly announced that she’s stepping down at the end of June, after months of campus turmoil.

So she’ll be gone, but the destructive race-focused agenda she imposed on the campus that contributed to the problems will continue, unless the trustees take this opportunity to save the school from group-identity politics.

Pollack’s sudden departure almost certainly resulted from the post-Oct. 7 crisis on Cornell’s campus, which earned the school terrible press, the loss of donations and congressional scrutiny.

Immediately after the Hamas massacre, the campus exploded with support for terrorism under the banner of “decolonization.”

A student threatened to shoot and slit the throats of Jewish students; he’s now awaiting sentencing.

A professor declared that he felt “exhilarated” upon hearing of the Hamas attack. That prompted the crowd to break into genocidal chants of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.”

This embrace of violence has been repeated throughout the months since, with students at the Cornell tent encampment chanting, “There is only one solution, Intifada revolution!”

Multiple students testified before House committees as to the toxic atmosphere.

Things got so bad that Pollack eventually issued a statement saying calls for genocide violated the campus code.

But no one at Cornell wants to address what it was that radicalized the campus against Jews.

To understand Cornell post-Oct. 7, you need to understand the intense and all-encompassing race-focused initiative imposed on the campus by Pollack after George Floyd’s death.

I’ve been teaching at Cornell for almost 17 years and have witnessed how Pollack’s race-focused initiative marked a destructive inflection point.

In June 2020, Pollack assigned Ibram X. Kendi’s infamous book, “How To Be An Antiracist,” as suggested summer reading for the entire campus.

Kendiism set the tone: You are either with us or against us, either actively “anti-racist” or a racist, with no middle ground, and current discrimination is necessary to remedy past discrimination.

Pollack incorporated Kendi’s ideology into a campus-wide anti-racism initiative in mid-July 2020, including plans for mandatory Diversity, Equity and Inclusion training and course work for students, staff and even faculty.

The senior academic DEI official was elevated to Pollack’s leadership team, and may be next in line to become provost.

I spoke out against this forced campus activism and predicted it would set students against each other, but the administration ignored me.

A September 2020 Faculty Coalition list of demands called for Pollack’s initiative to include racial employment preferences for non-whites.

Though Pollack had not mentioned Israel in her initiative, the demands called for reconsidering Cornell’s relationship with The Technion in Israel, showing how the anti-racism initiative was used against Israel.

Since then, the DEI initiative, centering race and group identity, has permeated almost every aspect of campus.

Decolonization has become the campus religion, with a “land acknowledgment” — a statement acknowledging that the campus is located on the traditional homeland of the Cayuga Nation —   becoming the campus liturgy.

While the racialization of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute has been a common tactic elsewhere, it metastasized on Cornell’s campus, and it erupted viciously after Oct. 7.

It is now routine for anti-Israel groups at Cornell to form coalitions of “students of color” against Israel, trying to portray Israel as a common white enemy.

Decolonization rhetoric permeates the anti-Israel movement, including the encampment that still exists in the main quad as I write.

Adding modules on antisemitism to the DEI agenda, as Pollack proposed after campus disruptions, is not the answer.

Eliminating the group-identity focus is what’s needed.

It’s said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome. Cornell needs to stop the DEI insanity. It’s making things worse.

The school needs to refocus on the inherent dignity of the individual without regard to race or other group identities.

The July 2020 DEI initiative was a colossal mistake that cannot be tweaked around the edges.

It must be removed wholesale, weeded out root and branch.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

E Howard Hunt | May 13, 2024 at 2:10 pm

The strongest possible statement to halt this insanity and restore order would be the appointment of William Jacobson as president of Cornell.

    Nooooooo! Then he probably would have time for Legal Insurrection.

      Eric R. in reply to Leslie Eastman. | May 13, 2024 at 4:06 pm

      A price most of us would be willing to pay, as much as we would miss him. Such a role would be more important than this website.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to E Howard Hunt. | May 13, 2024 at 4:50 pm

    That is funny, but would probably be an injustice to Prof. Jacobson.

    “While I wish her well in her personal life”

    Too kind, she and others like her deserves to burn in hell.

    ConradCA in reply to E Howard Hunt. | May 13, 2024 at 7:40 pm

    DEI is inherently racist as it uses racism to determine who receives special treatment. MLK dreamed the people would be judged by the content of their character not the color of their skin and the Democratic Party has betrayed MLk and returned to try heir b racist ways. We would be foolish to trust any minority graduate of a DEI institution.

      bill54 in reply to ConradCA. | May 14, 2024 at 8:10 am

      I would say ANY graduate. The protesters seem to include a lot white women, too. Don’t judge them by the color of their skin…

Why should we WANT to save it, though?

Why should conservatives ‘save’ organizations that are utterly infested with leftists that have destroyed it.

Why should we care when unapologetically and rabidly leftist organizations self-destruct.

Stop saving them from the consequences of their own decisions.

Instead of saving them, create a new replacement and let the leftist rot die.

    There is, unfortunately, an obvious reason to save institutions like Cornell than to simply replace them. MONEY. I can’t afford to finance a new university. Even all of us together can’t out-spend the massive financial inertia tied up in Cornell, Harvard, MIT, etc, etc, etc.

    Eric R. in reply to Olinser. | May 13, 2024 at 4:09 pm

    Cornell is unique compared to most elite universities, especially the Ivies, in that part of the University is actually public and not private. I believe that it is a clear minority of students who attend the public portion but could conceivably provide an opening to enforce the first amendment on campus.

    The problem is that the school is in a far-left state, whose Attorney General is a crazed, race-baiting, Trump hating Communist who has no inclination to defend free speech for anyone whose views are to the right of Che Guevara.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to Olinser. | May 13, 2024 at 4:58 pm

    I agree, our educational system is corrupted beyond repair. If all the bad apples are removed, what would be left? Teacher certification will have to be abolished, hiring will have to be done outside the existing system. Why not, that is how America was built?

You don’t know what a metaphor means until you know what advice it is giving.

Perhaps digging deep and turning over the earth would be better. Then plant soybeans.

Professor,

You are the obvious person to ask. My understanding is that you cannot enforce the 1st Amendment at a private university like you can at a state school.

However, Cornell is part public AND part private. As I recall, the Agriculture and Biology (Life Sciences, but I am too lazy to look it up) and perhaps one or two other divisions are state while the A & S and Engineering colleges are private.

So, if you are in the Ag School, you can sue for infringement of your first Amendment rights but an engineering student can’t?

What if an Engineering student protests AT the Ag School? After all, I assume the Ag facilities are state financed.

    BierceAmbrose in reply to Eric R.. | May 14, 2024 at 12:09 am

    Not the professor, nor do I play one on Teh Interwebz, but…

    It’s yet more tangled up than you’ve said. Individual “private” academics, departments, labs, and centers get govt funds. “Private” schools get govt funds. Students at “private” institutions get govt funds, only to be transferred to schools for tuition, fees, board.

    More than the academic side getting entangled by the govt’s 1A problem, the govt gets clipped: “How hard can people anti-1A and you, govt op, can still fund them>”

destroycommunism | May 13, 2024 at 6:04 pm

why not make it race focused as the left does allll the time

hmmm ok

without anyyyy gov help

or excuses allowed

no added points etc etc

what would the actual

RACE BASED RESULTS BE?

go on publish THOSE RESULTS!!

UNC Board of Governors just got rid of DEI and moved its funding to campus security- to help vs Palestinian protesters.

Eddie Coyle | May 14, 2024 at 9:16 am

With a spouse in lower levels of admin, she has told me for YEARS when they are searching for new engineering professors, White males stand little chance of consideration, and this is in ENGINEERING. All candidates have to be women and the ‘right’ minorities, qualification is a lower priority, BEST qualified has NO priority. BURN IT ALL DOWN, America does not need the poison these institutions represent, it is infecting everything from FAA to Med Schools to Police Department, Military, Secret Service and the private sector.