‘Killing America’ Documentary Exposes the Explosion in Antisemitism Post-October 7th
“Watch the film and you’ll see why extremist ideologues are doing everything in their power to censor the film and why I decided not to play their game and go straight to you, The People.”
A new documentary film called ‘Killing America’ examines the massive rise in antisemitism following the October 7th attacks in Israel and is worth your time.
The film focuses on a school district in California’s Bay Area and looks at the focus on DEI and the the rejection of merit-based programs such as advanced placement or ‘AP’ classes. In fact, the central thesis of the film is that the embrace of DEI and social justice in American education has devolved our society into tribes of oppressors vs. oppressed. It suggests that this view is Marxist at its core and that in addition to breeding the antisemitism we have seen on school campuses from students and teachers alike, it is killing the essence of what it means to be an American.
Unsurprisingly, this film was banned by YouTube. The filmmaker, Eli Steele, eventually released it for free on Rumble and Twitter/X.
FOX News reported:
Filmmaker releases ‘Killing America’ after YouTube pulled trailer amid cease and desist
Filmmaker Eli Steele released “Killing America” on all possible platforms to undermine what he believes are efforts to silence his documentary that explores whether an emphasis on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) and other race issues contributed to antisemitism plaguing a California school district.
“If we stand back and do nothing, then we are part of killing America,” Steele told Fox News Digital.
“We really have to stand up and question,” he continued. “Why do we let these people educate our children who are ideologues?”
The 38-minute “Killing America” examines widespread antisemitism in San Francisco-area schools after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7 and whether educational standards being lowered in the name of equity resulted in pushback against Israel and Jewish people. The film notes that racial equity is often prioritized ahead of merit at the schools in question, and honor classes were removed as ethnic studies were added.
But when the film’s trailer featured footage from a Sequoia Union High School District board meeting, Steele was hit with a cease-and-desist letter from a student newspaper of one of the schools in the film, Menlo-Atherton High School’s M-A Chronicle…
“These left-wing activists cannot stand dissent or opposition to the ideological order they seek to impose in our schools as well as our larger society. What you are witnessing here is the weaponization of the copyright law in these ugly culture wars to prevent my film from being shown in its full form. This is nothing less than suppression of free speech, which includes artistic expression and free thought,” Steele posted on X.
Eli Steele posted more about this on Twitter/X:
The “crime” that Killing America commits is telling the truth during these ideological times. Watch the film and you’ll see why extremist ideologues are doing everything in their power to censor the film and why I decided not to play their game and go straight to you, The People.
Lastly, I have made the point to release this film as widely as possible for free because I want the word out. We’ve been too far timid and we’ve allowed ourselves to be intimidated for too long, so please share this film widely.
The movie comes in under 38 minutes and again, this is worth your time. You can watch it on Twitter/X or Rumble below:
After enduring a week of unwarranted takedowns of the Killing America trailer on @Youtube and @Vimeo as well as receiving a baseless cease and desist letter that seeks to prevent my documentary from being shown in its original form, I’ve decided to release the full (38 min)… pic.twitter.com/KL6RxeJ3KE
— Eli Steele (@Hebro_Steele) April 5, 2024
Featured image via Rumble video.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Could we discuss Tucker Carlson’s part in it?
He is by far the most prominent anti-Semite on the right don’t you think we should?
Tucker Carlson’s anti-Semitism and anti-Israel message is word for word identical to the DEI crowd.
Of course typical leftist nonsense.
You MUST ignore the multiple prominent sitting politicians, leaders, university staff, students, campaigns, and large organized protests.
No no no, we MUST talk about the one single guy on the right that you claim is doing it, and then act like that totally absolves the WIDESPREAD hatred from the left.
“”Jews are under assault around the world, so @TuckerCarlson decides to stoke hatred by presenting false portrayal of Israeli Jews being responsible for decline of Christians in M.E. even though Israel the only place Christian population is growing.””
William Jacobson
Didn’t think I would be saying this to you but thank you, you do yourself a great deal of credit for wanting to adopt an ounce of prevention over a pound of the cure.
Downvoted for the smug condescension.
I was referring to your calling my agreement with you, and being glad you agree an ounce of prevention beats a pound of the cure smug condescension.
I get my news from people I have come to trust … until they give me a reason not to trust them anymore. Tucker has given me a reason.
That was meant, does vandetta over having disagreed with someone in the past matter so much to you you can’t even take a compliment in good faith?
The ounce of prevention over a pound of the cure is reffering to preventing Tucker from infecting the right, instead of being in the position of trying to get the anti-Semitism out of the right (when we could prevent it now by opposing/exposing Tucker).
I am glad you aren’t like Olinser, but seriously put your god damned faux victomhood at my hands to rest, we have never met, you don’t know a god damned thing about me other than we agree over 96% of the time on every single issue but disagreed strongly over who should have been the 2024 nominee and that now that it is resolved we are backing the same person.
You are not a victim of me, I have never done anything to you, and we have never even met.
All I did was quote the Prof. As far as the past is concerned, I don’t recall ever taking issue with anything you’ve posted, and I at least partially agree with you on some issues – so put your stupid overreaction to bed.
Tucker’s influence and standing makes him someone who has to be mentioned when discussing the post-October 7th anti-Semitism spike.
When it comes to anti-Semites if their influence is only bad because they are in the other party you are not against it, and you have no credibility in the discussion of it.
I am not on the left and the only thing I have to say to people fine with anti-Semitism is F and U
I’m curious — how do you defend Carlson’s decision to focus on the slanderous and utterly ridiculous accusation of alleged anti-Christian animus on the part of Israel, by inviting a crackpot pastor living under Islamofascist rule, to come on his show and vilify Israel, when everyone in the world knows that Muslims are responsible for 99.99% of anti-Christian violence and persecution, worldwide?
Why would Carlson choose to air this type of slander and pile on Israel, when the vile European dhimmis, American Dhimmi-crats and their Islamofascist/Muslim supremacist allies, have been toiling mightily, 24/7, to demonize Israel with the most baseless accusations? Carlson decides that he is going to reveal a “scoop,” which the rest of the Jew-hating dhimmis, Dhimmi-crats and Muslim supremacists, have somehow missed? Come on.
Carlson’s choice of subject and guest are totally indefensible and are shameful. They cannot be defended in any way, shape or form.
I don’t know what is in TC’s heart. I do know that this was an odd choice of topics. He usually allows the subjects of his interviews to meander around in their responses to his questions. I happen to prefer that style as opposed to there who interrupt the responses. Why he didn’t ask more penetrating questions and put the context of the Oslo accords into the interview which would reveal that Israel wasn’t in control of the areas this weirdo pastor was bitching about …I don’t have a clue. I can’t imagine that someone with his background and knowledge doesn’t understand that basic point. I am disappointed in TC for this failure on his part to be an honest broker.
Tucker has revealed his true colors.
Thank you, I couldn’t agree more.
Unrelated, I know it hasn’t been SUPER mainstream, but has the Professor looked at the Nicolae Miu case in Wisconsin? Verdict just came out today and has a lot of people up in arms that he was found guilty, the video being the particular sticking point.
I had never heard of this case until I saw a Matt Walsh video in which he discusses the case. The video is pretty poorly shot, but, it reveals the chaos of the scene. It seems clear that Miu was subject to belligerent behavior, before being physically attacked. The main issue that could could legitimately have come up at trial is one of proportionality, i.e., using deadly force (a knife) in response to being punched. That said, Miu is an older man and recent heart bypass patient, who was facing what appeared to be a gang assault by much younger and stronger assailants. In such a case, if he reasonably feared imminent bodily harm and/or death, using a knife would represent a legitimate and lawful act of lethal self-defense.
Scott Adams talks about the documentary effect. Always convincing because of telling only one side.
Even though it’s a very lonely rebuttal to the LSM’s overwhelming narrative?