Image 01 Image 03

UK University Museum Worries Paintings of British Countryside Might Evoke ‘Dark Nationalist Feelings’

UK University Museum Worries Paintings of British Countryside Might Evoke ‘Dark Nationalist Feelings’

“implication that only those with a historical tie to the land have a right to belong”

Landscape paintings are controversial now? In some ways, England has a worse ‘woke’ problem than America.

The College Fix reports:

University museum: Paintings of British countryside could elicit ‘dark nationalist feelings’

A British museum owned by the University of Cambridge recently “overhauled” its displays with “new signage,” one of which states paintings of the British countryside can conjure up sinister “nationalist feelings.”

According to The Telegraph, the Fitzwilliam Museum underwent a “refurbishment” over the last half-decade with “an emphasis on reflecting the ‘evolution of its collection.’”

The museum reopened last week with galleries based on themes rather than chronology. A sign for the new “Nature” gallery reads

Landscape paintings were also always entangled with national identity.

The countryside was seen as a direct link to the past, and therefore a true reflection of the essence of a nation.

Paintings showing rolling English hills or lush French fields reinforced loyalty and pride towards a homeland.

The work “Hampstead Heath” by John Constable (pictured) has more: The “dark side” of its alleged nationalism carries the “implication that only those with a historical tie to the land have a right to belong.”

According to the report, signage for such images comes not long after the group Wildlife and Countryside Link complained to legislators that the British countryside is viewed “as a ‘racist colonial white space.”

Fitzwilliam Director Luke Syson said signage for images like Constable’s “suggest some new ways of looking, without insisting on them.” He scoffed at the notion the museum was becoming “woke.”

“Being inclusive and representative shouldn’t be controversial; it should be enriching,” Syson said. “I would love to think that there’s a way of telling these larger, more inclusive histories that doesn’t feel as if it requires a pushback from those who try to suggest that any interest at all in work by women artists or artists of colour – or subject matter that takes us into the world of LBGT culture – is being ‘radical chic’ or what would now be called ‘woke.’”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The Gentle Grizzly | March 18, 2024 at 11:42 am

Britain becomes more castrated and whipped with each passing day.

caseoftheblues | March 18, 2024 at 6:23 pm

The English have a long history of being somewhat comfortable with a boot on their necks

implication that only those with a historical tie to the land have a right to belong

With statements like that replacement theory is looking more like outright progressive policy than “far-right conspiracy mongering”.

Oh sure. Looking at a romanticized painting of some national park now has me wondering where the throngs of tourist buses, litter and morons trying to hand-feed bears or take selfies with bisons are.

Nowadays any art, no matter how benign, must contain trigger warning if it was created by white males?

Living people with ancient, historic and contemporary ties to the land where they live are invalid stakeholders in a land acknowledgment.