Image 01 Image 03

Trump Georgia Case: Friend Said DA Willis, Special Prosecutor Wade Started Relationship in 2019

Trump Georgia Case: Friend Said DA Willis, Special Prosecutor Wade Started Relationship in 2019

Wade and Willis claimed they started their relationship in 2022 after she hired him to be the special prosecutor in the case.

The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s Georgia case is hearing arguments to disqualify Fulton County DA Fani Willis over her relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade.

I was going to wait until the hearing ended, but interesting information has come to light.

Former Friend of Willis

A former friend of Willis and an employee said Willis and Wade began their relationship in 2019.

Wade and Willis claimed they started their relationship in 2022 after she hired him to be the special prosecutor in the case. But it sounds suspicious due to a lack of experience in this arena.

Wade’s Testimony

Wade is not helping matters at all.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

What’s truly glorious about this is none of it would have happened if she had not sold her soul to go after Trump. So in essence this is all Trumps fault! 😂😂

    Another deranged prog mentally and spiritually broken by TDS.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to mailman. | February 15, 2024 at 5:31 pm

    Fat Fani Willis hired a gigolo with state funds It seems that was his only qualification.

      It does seem to be his only qualifications as he has no experience in cases like this. His testimony seemed to me to be of someone who got caught, knows it and is trying to get out from under the bus by stuffing Fani under it.

Well I would certainly believe an anonymous friend before I believe any communist a-hole like Fanny

I don’t see the interest in the case. You already knew she was a moral idiot.

    mailman in reply to rhhardin. | February 15, 2024 at 3:58 pm

    Because this case involves a blatantly political hack whose poor impaired judgement has made a mockery of the justice system in America.

    Secondly, this is what you get when you have low calibre people promoted in to positions of responsibility. They have no idea what accountability is and worse still, no respect for the tax payers who are paying for her poor decisions.

    Thirdly, this to me is the most important question that no one is asking, I want to know why her fuckboi was meeting with the Biden regime before charges were made? I want to know what was discussed at those meetings and whether what was discussed led to the charges being made. Because a bad answer (ie. they were strategising how to go after Trump) is incredibly dangerous ground for Democrats to be traversing.

    Eddie Baby in reply to rhhardin. | February 15, 2024 at 4:19 pm

    This case is tied to a prosecution of the leading GOP presidential candidate. Seems like news to me, ymmv.

    diver64 in reply to rhhardin. | February 15, 2024 at 4:21 pm

    Two morally compromised midwits playing patty cakes on our dime is disturbing but outside of the gift I’m not seeing how this actually affects the case against Trump outside both of them being disbarred

    It’s part of an election interference campaign, coordinated by the Joe Biden* regime. That’s not of interest to you?

    Ironclaw in reply to rhhardin. | February 15, 2024 at 11:41 pm

    So you think that defrauding the taxpayers is a good thing then? Or that you know prosecutors shouldn’t have any ethics?

      Milhouse in reply to Ironclaw. | February 16, 2024 at 3:24 am

      Of course he doesn’t think it’s a good thing! But the question remains valid: Why the interest? You don’t take an interest in every bad thing that happens in the world. You don’t even take an interest in bad things that Trump has done. Because they’re not relevant. So here we have two lawyers who are, as rhhardin says, moral idiots, and we find out that they behaved like moral idiots. Why the interest? How is it relevant to anything we care about?

      Mailman gave the answer: If they’re both replaced, the new DA, on reviewing the case with fresh and unbiased eyes, may realize that there’s no there there, and decide that it’s not in the public interest to pursue it.

Cheaters always get “creative” with their timeline. It works with casual acquaintances, but not in court.

Willis is a dissembler par excellence.

If you don’t live in Atlanta (Fulton Cty), you probably don’t have an accurate measure of how corrupt the city and county governments are. Fanni Willis isn’t an outlier. She’s the norm. Even if this case gets dismissed (justifiably), the chances of Willis or Wade facing any substantive consequence from their actions are just about zero. That’s simply not how things work here and that dynamic is compounded by the inaction of our limp-wristed governor. The governor and AG are terrified of shinning any light on ATL/Fulton county. They don’t want to be labeled racists.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to TargaGTS. | February 15, 2024 at 6:23 pm

    How about Federal charges?

      TargaGTS in reply to JohnSmith100. | February 15, 2024 at 7:33 pm

      I guess it would depend if Trump gets reelected. Absent that, I wouldn’t hold your breath. There have been a handful of federal corruption cases brought in the city. But, they’ve also passed on a lot of low-hanging fruit, as well. Even though the jail has been so poorly mismanaged (criminally so) that it’s been placed in federal receivership a couple times over the last two decades, no one has been prosecuted in spite of GIANT accounting failures leading to money that is simply gone missing. For some context, the Feds have been WAY tougher on Detroit and Chicago than they’ve been on ATL.

      From garland? Are you crazy? Why would that politicized asshole do anything?

This is starting to look like a movie.
The way her testimony is going I expect her to shout “Yes I ordered that code red.”

I tried watching today but I simply could not stand listening to her speak. I turned off the TV. What is plain to me is, if what we see in Willis is hero-worship by American progressives, coupled with affirmative action policies to select unqualified students for undergraduate and law school admissions but for the guise of reaching a goal of increasing the number of underrepresented minorities, then they accomplished their goals. Fanny Willis is what it is.

    Camperfixer in reply to Ghostrider. | February 15, 2024 at 6:32 pm

    It’s “Fah-Nee” doncha know. Geez, another incompetent DEI hire. Grateful her corruption and hubris is throwing a wrench into the Dems (including her paramour visiting with Biden’s Handlers) seditious game against PDJT…or at least hopefully is.

With $20,000.00 plus in trips that’s a lot of reimbursement and not just pocket money. Does her bank statement have coinciding withdrawals? If he used his business card there has to be evidence of the reimbursement or he may be looking at fraud and tax issues.

    Peabody in reply to ghost dog. | February 15, 2024 at 5:57 pm

    We’re talking five trips in six months. I thought they budgeted their money pretty well which allowed them to go on more trips and have more fun. A lot of people would’ve blown it on all one trip.

thalesofmiletus | February 15, 2024 at 5:23 pm

5 years in jail? What’s the punishment if you’re a Democrat?

Wow, just witness the content of character on display by Nat the Rat. He looks as if someone is feeding him answers to the wrong questions, or he is too stupid to pull it off.

My God, this is supposed to be a lawyer.

https://twitter.com/saras76/status/1758245287468953921?s=61&t=oH_tEr6S93iIsZXqTPNorA

Her courtroom demeanor is worse than Kamala Harris’ Senate hearing demeanor. She supposedly has 16 years’ experience as a prosecutor. How in the world did she manage to keep that job?

Oh Black Fani is about to get bam ba lammed

I have little faith in this judge. He let’s the inmates run the courtroom. He does not exhibit control over the room and seems scared to rule on anything.
Maybe he will surprise and do the right thing and remove this person for lack of candor.

He like his women phat.