Trump Georgia Case: Cellphone Data Allegedly Contradicts Wade’s Testimony About Visiting Willis’s Home Before 2022

Trump Georgia Case: Cellphone Data Allegedly Contradicts Wade’s Testimony About Visiting Willis’s Home Before 2022

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that cellphone data might show that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade started their relationship before 2022.

According to the data, Wade made “at least 35 visits to the Hapeville neighborhood where Fani Willis was living before the district attorney hired him.”

This information is important for one main reason. It conflicts with Wade’s testimony:

Trump’s lawyers relied on data collected from Wade’s cellphone and cellphone tower transmissions to track his movements. It seems to contradict Wade’s testimony last week in which he said he had visited Willis at her condo in Hapeville no more than 10 times before he was hired in November 2021. It also indicates Wade twice arrived late at night at the condo and left early the next morning in the months before Willis and Wade said their relationship became romantic early in 2022.

Both Wade and Willis testified last week that they did not spend the night together at the Hapeville condo.

Charles Mittelstadt, a board-certified criminal defense investigator, used the CellHawk program to analyze phone records. The address and phone numbers are blacked out in the affidavit:

1) Generating a report, attached as Exhibit A, isolating all interactions (this includes voice calls and text messages) between Mr. Wade and Ms. Willis during the period of available records in 2021: The dates, timing, frequency and duration of these interactions are included as part of the report. That report revealed over 2000 voice calls and just under 12,000 text messages exchanged over the 11-month period in 2021. A heat map, attached as Exhibit B, highlights the interaction patterns which demonstrate a prevalence of calls made in the evening hours.

2) Focusing on geolocation near [Willis address blackedout], which was testified to by Ms. Yearti as the address of her condominium, and generating a report to reflect such activity, attached as Exhibit C: Given the urgency associated with the need to analyze this newly acquired data against the relevant testimony, |constructed a very conservative geofence which isolated the two cell towers in closest proximity to this address (one roughly 3000″ and the other 2000″ away). The purpose of this geofence was to conduct an inital assessment of whether Mr. Wade’s phone ever connected to these towers. Additionally, this modality was used to eliminate the possibility that his could be associated with routine travel on ether 1-75 or 185 or visits to nearby attractions or the airport. Following that initial conservative sweep limited to those 2 towers, I further constrained those findings to hits on [blacked out number] or [blacked out number] which pointed directly at the [blacked out address]. Additionally, the report was limited to those occasions when the phone was connected for an extended period.

The third video in the below tweet is crucial. On February 15, The attorney asked Wade if he went to Willis’s condo before November 1, 2021, no more than ten times.

Wade: “No, sir.”

The attorney then asks if it was fewer than ten times.

Wade: “Yes, sir.”

The attorney asked Wade if he would consider any phone records that clashed with his testimony wrong.

Wade: “Yes, sir.” and “They’d be wrong.”

In the fourth video, Willis contradicted Wade. She said, “I’d say more than 10, but I’m not sure that is even accurate.”

Here’s 3 instances of Nathan Wade admitting he committed perjury and the 4th being Nathan Wade saying he had been at the home of Fani Willis LESS than 10 times but Fani contradicting his testimony by saying it had been MORE than 10 times.

Perjury is still illegal right ?? pic.twitter.com/R60V4xtJVE

— CannaKingCA (@CannaKingCA20) February 16, 2024

I see others, including AJC, framing the story as the data called into question when Wade and Willis started their relationship, which is totally valid:

The filing, by attorneys for Donald Trump, raises fresh questions about the relationship between the two prosecutors, which the former president and other defendants argue has tainted the case against them and should result in Willis and her office being disqualified.

Trump’s lawyers relied on data collected from Wade’s cellphone and cellphone tower transmissions to track his movements. It seems to contradict Wade’s testimony last week in which he said he had visited Willis at her condo in Hapeville no more than 10 times before he was hired in November 2021. It also indicates Wade twice arrived late at night at the condo and left early the next morning in the months before Willis and Wade said their relationship became romantic early in 2022.

But relying on the data to prove that point is questionable. I know someone who was best friends with her now-husband before they dated. She visited his apartment many times to hang out before they dated.

The key is the testimony.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.