Image 01 Image 03

Big Education Needs Big Oversight

Big Education Needs Big Oversight

Big Education shows no desire to police itself, therefore, it is incumbent upon Congress to enact the appropriate oversight to rein in the abuses.

The Wizard of Oz was exposed as a fraud when the curtain was pulled back. The curtain has now been pulled back on Big Education exposing fraud and abuse. The American people are ready to have a critical review of academia and a new level of regulations of Big Education in America.

The spectacle of Congressional hearings on rampant and revolting antisemitism on the campuses of colleges and university was quickly followed by the exposure of Harvard President Dr. Claudine Gay as a serial plagiarist.  Dr. Gay was also exposed for having a thin body of academic publications.

This suggests that an ideologically driven faculty at Harvard and other academic institutions have endeavored to cloak like-minded individuals, like Dr. Gay, with the respect and imprimatur of “doctor” with scant academic rigor; certainly, far less academic rigor than would normally be applied to a PhD candidate, or a candidate that does not share the same ideals or biases as the faculty.

Loss of intellectual honesty, the very reason for these colleges and universities, is not the only problem facing Big Education.

First, there is the problem of the massive amount of questionable student loans, many of which will default. The consensus estimate is that there is $500 Billion in outstanding student loans, and the American taxpayers are likely to be left holding the bag for the bulk of those loans. One factor in this massive student loan problem is bloated tuition; tuition that outpaced inflation year after year as colleges and universities padded their administrative staff and paid them quite handsomely.

Second, the Supreme Court of the United States held that Harvard University violated the Equal Protection Clause of United States Constitution with its affirmative action admissions practices. Affirmative action admissions practices are, at their core, a variation of “Diversity Equity. and Inclusion” or DEI. Rather than obey the Supreme Court ruling, and follow the United States Constitution, many colleges and universities sought to circumvent the spirit of that ruling and the Constitutional mandate in novel ways, including eliminating standardized tests and other objective admissions criteria.

Third, rather than focusing on teaching and academic research, the core missions of colleges and universities, many of these institutions have taken to espousing virulent anti-Western civilization and anti-American rhetoric. Indoctrination has replaced education as the core mission for Big Education. In large part this has been driven by large foreign contributions from nations hostile to western civilization in general, and America in particular. That’s a problem.

Clearly Big Education cannot cure the problems plaguing it today, or it would have started to do so in earnest already. So, here are a couple of suggestions to cure the problems ailing Big Education today.

First, there should be taxation of foreign contributions of designated hostile foreign countries. This should be monitored by the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Education. Better yet require Big Education to disclose all foreign contributions on publicly filed Form 990’s. That would allow third party watchdog groups to have access to this information on the Internal Revenue Service websites; currently all charities are required to file Form 990’s with the Internal Revenue Service and anyone can view those filings online.

Second, colleges and universities that engage in political activities should lose tax-exempt status. The Internal Revenue Code already has provisions prohibiting political activity by charities, but these rules are rarely enforced against liberal colleges and universities. Hillary Clinton, Bill DeBlasio, Lori Lightfoot, Paul Krugman and many other current and former politicians use college campuses and lecture halls as platforms to promote their political agendas with the imprimatur of legitimacy. Likewise, Columbia School of Journalism has engaged in politics in awarding the Pulitzer Prize. Columbia awarded the Pulitzer Prize to the New York Times and the Washington Post for sensational reporting on the great Russian Hoax, but never revoked that prize after the Russian Hoax was thoroughly debunked. Nor did the Columbia School of Journalism see fit to award the prize to Miranda Devine for her reporting on the Hunter Biden laptop. The common thread is rank partisan politics.

Third, Congress needs to establish an Equal Educational Opportunity Commission (styled after the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) to review and sanction colleges and universities that engage in discriminatory admissions policies in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. The EEOC should have the authority to supervise, or even take over, the admissions at colleges and universities that routinely and systematically discriminate in violation of the Supreme Court Ruling. In the past similar actions were taken against businesses engaged in insidious behavior and to rectify discrimination based upon race, religion, and other protected categories.

The American people have a vested interest in restoring education to its core mission. Colleges and universities have enjoyed tremendous tax advantages as exempt charities over the years, and taxpayers will soon be bailing out the ballooning student loan fiasco. Clearly Big Education shows no desire to police itself, therefore, it is incumbent upon Congress to enact the appropriate oversight to rein in the abuses.

——————-

Phil Vecchio is a Christian, a husband, a father of three grown children, a proud grandfather, an attorney, and a certified public accountant.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

It just needs dissident voices inside. Congress will make it worse by saying what dissident voices are legitimate.

    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to rhhardin. | January 15, 2024 at 7:45 am

    Yes. Just what we need: yet still another further different government agency.

    pdulchinos in reply to rhhardin. | January 15, 2024 at 11:11 am

    Let the universities underwrite their own college loans not the government. They should assume the default risk for bad outcomes based on awarding useless degrees. Colleges should lose their tax exempt status and then they might operate like a profit center and be forced to keep the costs of higher ed lower for all its consumers.

    Danny in reply to rhhardin. | January 15, 2024 at 11:25 am

    The idea you change major institutions without use of power is just silly.

Oversight? No. Just cut all Federal funding to education. All of it. Every single penny. That includes government backed student loans. Shut down the Dept. of Education.

Mandatory plagiarism audits of all DEI hires such as claudine gay.

Exactly ass-backwards.

It doesn’t need ‘oversight’. It needs to stop being shielded from the consequences of its actions.

Universities can charge anything they want for tuition because of the federal government pretty much automatically granting full loans to any student regardless of their background or evaluated ability to ever pay back the loan. Because they know goddamn well that no bank would give a Gender Studies major with zero work history a $200k loan for a degree whose ONLY job prospects are teaching others the same major.

Why? Because they claimed it was ‘racist’ that banks were refusing to loan money to those poor minorities with bad grades to go to college.

We need LESS government involvement and let the universities have to actually convince banks that they are providing value for money to students.

    BierceAmbrose in reply to Olinser. | January 14, 2024 at 10:52 pm

    “Universities can charge anything they want for tuition because of the federal government pretty much automatically granting full loans to any student…”

    Oh, you should hear them whine when the increases they want aren’t covered. “This is what it takes to program the polyps into the right, righteous world. Pay up.”

    Danny in reply to Olinser. | January 15, 2024 at 11:26 am

    While that is true making college cheaper doesn’t change any of the other issues.

Philip J. Vecchio | January 14, 2024 at 8:55 pm

Elite academic institutions have long been the sacred cow of the Left. Faculty at these institutions have long promoted government regulation of the private sector and the free marketplace in general. I say it is high time that they got a large dose of their own medicine.

    For starters, we do not have to voluntarily give them our money.

    Why Are You Still Sending Your Kids to School?: The Case for Helping Them Leave, Chart Their Own Paths, and Prepare for Adulthood
    Author: Blake Boles
    Year: 2020

    The Case Against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money
    Author: Bryan Caplan
    Year: 2018

    The Teenage Liberation Handbook (Third Edition): How to Quit School and Get a Real Life and Education
    Author: Grace Llewelyn
    Year: 2021

    Inside American Education: The Decline, The Deception, The Dogmas
    Author: Thomas Sowell, PhD
    Year: 1992

angrywebmaster | January 15, 2024 at 5:59 am

Here’s a thought. Go after all those endowments they’re sitting on. Havard’s endowment is so huge that they could pay for every applicant right through a PHD for decades.

Perhaps it’s time to end their tax exempt status.

E Howard Hunt | January 15, 2024 at 7:05 am

A woman’s place is in the kitchen, not in the college president’s office.

    ChrisPeters in reply to E Howard Hunt. | January 15, 2024 at 10:21 am

    Such statements get us nowhere, or worse, set us back.

    If a woman has the appropriate skills and common sense, she would be able to perform well as a college president.

    If only our system of higher education had many Margaret Thatcher-type women serving as college presidents!

      E Howard Hunt in reply to ChrisPeters. | January 15, 2024 at 11:20 am

      No, it is your weakling desire to appear reasonable to an implacable enemy that keeps us back. It is not a biting, satirical comment on one of the few conservative websites that still allow them. Man up.

    Harvard president larry summers forced to resign because he made accurate observation about women and STEM. Only men who are permitted now are male feminists and gay males.

“sanction colleges and universities that engage in discriminatory admissions policies” Right. Definitely. But you didn’t mention the BIGGER problem: discrimination in HIRING AND PROMOTING college teachers (up through administration). It was that very EEOC itself in the 1970s that pushed “Affirmative” [sic} Action illegally upon the college teacher hiring process to force preference for anyone-other-than-white-males. Why don’t we get that same EEOC to behave LEGALLY now, to eliminate that form of discrimination, right?

This country needs less gov’t meddling in the private economy, not more meddllng in the form of a new federal agency to police the higher education industry. The industry’s sad state today began with the federal subsidization stemming from the passage of the Higher Education Act of 1965. This legislation ushered in the many billions of student financial aid, including student loans, that then caused institutions to increase tuition levels well beyond general levels of inflation. While well-intentioned, these subsidies have led to negative unintended consequences. But as is so often the case with well-intentioned gov’t subsidies and favors, outcomes are not salutary for individuals or the country at large. The problem now is how to unwind higher ed subsidization without doing any more damage to students, institutions, and taxpayers. The answer is not massive student loan forgiveness. But it’s unclear what the correct future policy decisions may be looking ahead..

“Second, colleges and universities that engage in political activities should lose tax-exempt status. ”

I’m with the Blue Knights, we’re a Law-enforcement motorcycle club, a 501c registered non profit. A member of our chapter wanted to have our club donate to the incumbent sheriffs campaign. I said we can’t do that, our 501C status says we cannot engage in politics. I have no doubt most of the members voted for the man, and we did pass the hat around for him, but a direct check from the club to him we cannot do. Have a small club we have 50 members can’t write a check to a politician, I think the same should apply to Harvard University and it’s endowment larger than multiple nations.

Philip J. Vecchio | January 15, 2024 at 3:07 pm

Colleges and universities enjoy tremendous benefits from tax-exemption at the expense of everyone else. That includes federal and state income tax exemption, as well as property tax and sales tax exemptions. (Have you checked how much you pay in property and sales taxes lately?). Furthermore, contributions to colleges and universities are deductible by the donors as charitable contributions, and most of those donors are in the highest income tax brackets. Finally, state and local governments annually grant large sums of money to these organizations for various purposes.

Accordingly, the American taxpayer has every right to demand accountability from colleges and universities, and every right to demand that these “private” colleges and universities respect equal protection of applicants and employees as incorporated in the United States Constitution by the 5th and 14th Amendment. That accountability cannot occur without government oversight or a private right to sue.

The article’s subheading says, “Big Education shows no desire to police itself, therefore, it is incumbent upon Congress to enact the appropriate oversight to reign in the abuses.”

I know this may sound trivial, but I wish people would learn the difference between “rein” and “reign”.

Yes! Let’s get The Gubmint to do more! They do such a good job. They wouldn’t f*ck this up at all. There’d be no graft, no corruption. It’d really be so much better, if we just got Congress (more) involved.