Image 01 Image 03

‘Noticing a Pattern Here?’: Trump’s Indictment Happened After Hunter Associate Confirms Biden was on Phone Calls

‘Noticing a Pattern Here?’: Trump’s Indictment Happened After Hunter Associate Confirms Biden was on Phone Calls

“There’s no such thing as this much coincidence and if you’ve been paying attention, you will realize that we have become a banana republic. Truly disgusting.”

https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1319465239365156866?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1319465239365156866%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3%2Ccontainerclick_1&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailywire.com%2Fnews%2Ftrump-the-laptop-from-hell-is-now-another-russia-hoax-you-gotta-be-kidding-me%3F3Futm_source%3Dtwitterutm_medium%3Dsocialutm_campaign%3Ddwtwitter

Donald Trump Jr. has a great point. So do a lot of other people.

Trump indictments and charges always seem to happen whenever news drops against Biden and his family.

Oh, you want to talk about election interference?

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

No doubt the timing seems too extraordinary to be a continuous series of coincidences.

Democrats must control the news cycle to control the “fake but accurate” narrative.

They hold back what they intend to do all along until a propitious moment.

Subotai Bahadur | August 1, 2023 at 7:56 pm

Does anybody here think that this builds confidence in the integrity or indeed the reality of anything that may be called elections in 2024? We have a little over a year to decide how we will react.

Subotai Bahadur

    alaskabob in reply to Subotai Bahadur. | August 1, 2023 at 8:33 pm

    The Left has planned, decided and implemented their campaign. Somewhere Lenin, Stalin, Beria, Mao, the wallpaper hanger all applaud their fellow travelers.

June 7: FBI releases documents to Congress alleging the Bidens took a $10M bribe from Burisma.

June 8: Jack Smith indicts Trump in Mar-a-Lago docs case.

July 26: Hunter Biden goes to court and rejects sweetheart plea deal after it was revealed DOJ tried to give him blanket immunity from future prosecutions.

July 27: Jack Smith adds more charges for Trump in the Mar-a-lago case.

July 31: Hunter Biden’s former business partner testifies to Congress that Joe Biden was on over 20 calls with his son’s business partners and that Burisma execs pressured them to fire the prosecutor

August 1: Jack Smith indicts Trump again for January 6.

    mailman in reply to Tiki. | August 2, 2023 at 5:49 am

    Come on Tiki…Im sure its all just coincidence and the straight shooters at Biden’s DoJ wouldn’t dare entertain the thought of indicting someone purely because they are Biden’s only competitor in the next election. This reeks of conspiracy!!

    MattMusson in reply to Tiki. | August 2, 2023 at 7:10 am

    On correction – the DOJ did give Hunter Biden blanket immunity. Because it was not part of the Plea Deal and in a separate addendum, it is still in effect and not part of the Deal that was put on hold. That is why the Judge objected so strenuously. She was not given an opportunity to rule on the immunity. It was separate and apart from the Plea Deal.

    The only thing Hunter can be prosecuted for are the two misdemeanors that he was already charged with.

Was it actually any surprise that the fascist pedophile in the would send his is gestapo after his political opponents?

Steven Brizel | August 2, 2023 at 9:19 am

Biden keeps on asking for proof of where is the money. 18 US 201(c) states:

“(c)Whoever—
(1)otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—
(A)directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or
(B)being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;”

This provision goes way beyond receiving cash directly and imposesliability for a quid pro quo that was performed by a public officical with the expectation of a direct or indirect value. Would this not be what happened with the money dispersed thru the Biden family LLCs?

2smartforlibs | August 2, 2023 at 11:51 am

Nice catch Mary. Did you get that from the at least months’ worth of comments I have been making here?