New Jersey Sues School Districts That Require Parent Notification of Child’s Gender Transition
“confident that the board’s amended policy properly balances parental and student rights”
It’s amazing that we have come to this point. The parents of New Jersey must remember that they are the ones who fund these schools.
The College Fix reports:
New Jersey sues school districts which require parent notification of ‘transitioning’ students
The state of New Jersey is suing three school districts that require parents be notified “when gender-nonconforming students wish to change their names, be called by new pronouns, or request other accommodations.”
New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin filed civil rights complaints against the Middletown Township, Marlboro Township and Manalapan-Englishtown Regional districts this past week, mere hours after the districts had approved the policies.
It’s the second time in 30 days that Platkin’s office has gone to court over transgender student rights, according to NJ.com.
Platkin said in a statement that the state “will not tolerate any action by schools that threatens the health and safety” of children. He called the districts’ policies “discriminatory” and said they were a “severe risk” to trans and non-binary students.
Five years ago the New Jersey Department of Education issued regulations making gender-based decisions dependent upon students, not parents. New Jersey and federal law “require schools to ensure a safe and supportive environment for transgender students.”
If a student wants a Tylenol for a headache, however, his/her parent must be notified.
Marc Zitomer, attorney for the Marlboro Township School Board, said his district “vehemently disagreed” with Platkin and added he was “confident that the board’s amended policy properly balances parental and student rights.”
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
This is what happens when the population has been converted to compliant sheep.
They accept human vivisection, child vivisection to be exact.
No, this is what happens when people do not care enough to vote and Murphy and Hochul narrowly win in NJ and NY, respectively.
I thought Murphy’s victory in NJ was highly questionable. The R guy said he’d appeal and told his supporters not to worry, then … nothing.
In NY I think Hochul won “fair and square” using some very hardball tactics. She forced a very tough Covid-vax policy on college students. That would drive conservative college students (who are voting age) out of the state. Then she did a big GOTV effort at the colleges, and won because of that college vote, now that the colleges were cleansed of conservatives. I have to admire the effectiveness of that strategy, dammit.
And the interesting thing is that it used to be that school personnel couldn’t do anything to/for children without getting permission from the parents. You almost couldn’t give them aspirin without notification, at least.
But that was back when actual care for the children was the highest priority, not the doctrines of hedonism and transhumanism.
where is Chris Christi cream on this
On the big questions, you’re lucky if Christie is merely absent.
On guns, he was an active antagonist.
How much of this topsy turvy nonsense is being handed down by committees comprising ugly unmarried women with piercings and men with what I call “designer label” beards and man-buns?
Your comment reminded me of this Branco cartoon… who (by the way) I haven’t seen featured here in over a year..?
Time to take names for the next round of elections in New Jersey.