Arizona State Journalism Prof Suggests the Media Should Continue ‘Abandoning Objectivity’
“newsrooms are debating whether traditional objectivity should still be the standard for news reporting”
![](https://c3.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Campus-News.jpg)
Does someone want to clue in this professor on the fact that the media has already done this?
The College Fix reports:
Media should abandon ‘objectivity’: ASU journalism professor
The media currently is too neutral and values “objectivity” too highly, according to a journalism professor at Arizona State University.
Professor Leonard Downie, the former executive editor of The Washington Post, recently wrote that “newsrooms are debating whether traditional objectivity should still be the standard for news reporting.”
He wrote in the Washington Post that “increasingly” some journalists are abandoning objectivity.
Downie argued that this is a good change of pace.
He wrote:
But increasingly, reporters, editors and media critics argue that the concept of journalistic objectivity is a distortion of reality. They point out that the standard was dictated over decades by male editors in predominantly White newsrooms and reinforced their own view of the world. They believe that pursuing objectivity can lead to false balance or misleading “bothsidesism” in covering stories about race, the treatment of women, LGBTQ+ rights, income inequality, climate change and many other subjects. And, in today’s diversifying newsrooms, they feel it negates many of their own identities, life experiences and cultural contexts, keeping them from pursuing truth in their work.
In his own time at the paper, Downie said he never considered objectivity to be a “standard.”
“My goals for our journalism were instead accuracy, fairness, nonpartisanship, accountability and the pursuit of truth,” he wrote.
Times have changed, according to Downie.
He wrote:
Now, the mainstream news media is coping with economic and digital disruption, along with increasing competition from misinformation on cable television and the internet. Meanwhile, American society itself has been in upheaval over discrimination against and abuse of women; persistent racism and white nationalism; police brutality and killings; the treatment of LGBTQ+ people; income inequality and social problems; immigration and the treatment of immigrants; the causes and effects of climate change; voting rights and election inequality; and even the very survival of our democracy. Reporting reliably on all of this has critically challenged newsrooms, calling into question their diversity, values and credibility.
![](https://c1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/subscribe-ad.jpg)
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Objectivity and fairness is “whiteness.”
Let’s all adopt some OTHER culture, where lying to each other every day about everything is encouraged.
“EXTRA: HUNTER DINDU NUFFIN”
Once they can move it into the court system, they win.
“newsrooms are debating whether traditional objectivity should still be the standard for news reporting”
A standard. The problem isn’t what they’re standard is; it’s claiming one standard while executing another.
I, myself, am a fan of advocacy, propaganda, and polemic, when up-front about what they’re doing and well done. More fun than Alien Bat-Boy stories from The National Enquirer.
Real journalism, as defined by the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics, requires objectivity. In fact, like the scientific process, objective fact finding research and reporting is essential to truth telling and basic understanding. Everything else is opinion, apologetics and propaganda.
Ideally this ASU professor is fired and replaced with a professor that teaches actual journalism.