Student Groups at UC-Berkeley School of Law Create ‘Jewish-Free Zones,’ School Dean Responds to Report
“by amending bylaws to ensure that they will never invite any speakers that support Israel or Zionism”
This story is positively nuts. What is going on at UC-Berkeley?
Kenneth L. Marcus reported at the Jewish Journal:
Berkeley Develops Jewish-Free Zones
If it wasn’t so frightening, one might be able to recognize the irony in the sight of campus progressives trying so hard to signal progressive virtue that they fall victim to a deeper moral shame.
Nine different law student groups at the University of California at Berkeley’s School of Law, my own alma mater, have begun this new academic year by amending bylaws to ensure that they will never invite any speakers that support Israel or Zionism. And these are not groups that represent only a small percentage of the student population. They include Women of Berkeley Law, Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, Law Students of African Descent and the Queer Caucus. Berkeley Law’s Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, a progressive Zionist, has observed that he himself would be banned under this standard, as would 90% of his Jewish students.
It is now a century since Jewish-free zones first spread to the San Francisco Bay Area (“No Dogs. No Jews”). Nevertheless, this move seems frightening and unexpected, like a bang on the door in the night.
Berkeley law students are not the first to exclude Zionists. At the State University of New York at New Paltz, activists drove two sexual assault victims out of a survivor group for being Zionists. At the University of Southern California, they drove Jewish student government vice president Rose Ritch out of office, threatening to “impeach [her] Zionist ass.” At Tufts, they tried to oust student judiciary committee member Max Price from the student government judiciary committee because of his support for Israel.
These exclusions reflect the changing face of campus antisemitism. The highest profile incidents are no longer just about toxic speech, which poisons the campus environment.
The dean responded to the article:
Response from Dean Chemerinsky:
Kenneth L. Marcus’ article, “Berkeley Develops Jewish-Free Zones,” paints a misleading picture of what happened at Berkeley Law. There is no “Jewish-Free Zone” at Berkeley Law or on the Berkeley campus. Indeed, as Mr. Marcus advocates, and as I explained in a recent message to the Law School community: “The Law School has an “all-comers” policy, which means that every student group must allow any student to join and all student organized events must be open to all students.” I know of no instance in which in this has been violated or there has been any discrimination against Jews. I have been in regular contact with our Jewish students about this.
The author didn’t buy the dean’s angle.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Save your children. Make Aliyah now. http://Www.Nbn.org.il.
Where do the goys go?
Possible options to investigate might include Australia, New Zealand, Caribbean island nations, UK, Ireland, Poland, The Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Greece, Canada, Mexico, Japan.. My understanding is that every country’s rules and requirements vary w.r.t. one’s place of birth, parentage, finances, circumstances.
“Australia, New Zealand, …, Canada”
I don’t think you’ve been paying attention to the news.
Costa Rica is nice. I think they have a program to grant residency to people of reasonable means.
Or check out http://MasaIsrael.org.
👍
Clarification: Jew-free zones mean Jews can go there for free.
If the Berkeley Law School organizations that adopted these noxious policies are officially recognized by the School, receive funding from the School or any other benefits from the School, then the School must suspend the organizations until they repeal these policies. Moreover, the Dean and the Chancellor of the Berkeley campus must be more forceful in opposing these policies. And, where is the Board of Regents?
I don’t think the Dean’s statement really answers the question–have the student law groups established policies to prohibit supporters of Israel or not? The question isn’t whether Jewish students can participate in groups or attend speeches–does the law school engage in viewpoint discrimination or not? The Dean should be able to answer that.
And the Jewish establishment in its zeal to be as woke as possible says and does nothing