‘Expand the Supreme Court’: The Left Goes Crazy Because Roe v. Wade *Might* Go Away
It’s not about abortion: “If you think these extremists from the radical right will stop with just Roe, think again. Contraception, LGBTQ+ rights, marriage equality…”
It’s not even official and the left has gone insane because SCOTUS might overturn Roe v. Wade.
Let’s see how the left is doing. Apparently not being able to murder your child will lead to the END OF EVERYTHING.
But some of these people let slip the endgame: No more filibuster, pack the court, codify Roe.
Abolish the filibuster.
Codify Roe.
Expand the Supreme Court.No one should be able to tell anyone what they can or can’t do with their bodies. Period.
— Nina Turner (@ninaturner) May 3, 2022
The Supreme Court is not only on verge of overturn Roe but they are laying the groundwork to overturn the right to birth control. This GOP Supreme Court is focused on ending self determination for women. #RoeVWade
— (((DeanObeidallah))) (@DeanObeidallah) May 3, 2022
If you think these extremists from the radical right will stop with just Roe, think again.
Contraception, LGBTQ+ rights, marriage equality…
Don’t think it can’t happen. It just did.#RoeVWade
— Heather Gardner (@heathergtv) May 3, 2022
An extremist Supreme Court is poised to overturn #RoeVWade and impose its far-right, unpopular views on the entire country. It's time for the millions who support the Constitution and abortion rights to stand up and make their voices heard. We're not going back—not ever.
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) May 3, 2022
If this draft opinion stands, it will destroy lives and put countless women in danger.
This won’t stop with choice and the right to privacy. They are undermining progress and erasing the civil protections and rights so many have fought for.
We have to fight.#RoeVWade pic.twitter.com/A81fWke5qd
— Office of the Governor of California (@CAgovernor) May 3, 2022
I used to be against expanding the Supreme Court.
Today is a new day.
Pack the f*cking Supreme Court with pro-women Justices until it’s standing room only.#RoeVWade #alito #istandwithplannedparenthood #wewontgoback https://t.co/ih5S6XlZxA
— The Miseducation of Carol Smith (@steelsnowflake1) May 3, 2022
The illegitimate right-wing majority on the United States Supreme Court is pro-rape, pro-incest, anti-woman, and anti-child. Are you cool with that?
— Mary L Trump (@MaryLTrump) May 3, 2022
Our daughters, sisters, mothers, and grandmothers will not be silenced.
The world is about to hear their fury.
California will not sit back. We are going to fight like hell. https://t.co/EhwSWXiZhx
— Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) May 3, 2022
“Get angry!”
“Cope and seethe, you guys lost”Tensions running high in the crowd gathering at the Supreme Court pic.twitter.com/qHj56oTTH7
— Nate Hochman (@njhochman) May 3, 2022
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
With all the focus on mental illness, the Democrats have made themselves poster children.
Be sure and check in on your Pro-Abortion relatives to make sure they are ok.
Here we have the first in a set of “manufactured crises” created by the left to attempt to maintain control over the sheeple.
This one appears to be directed toward white women based on the rhetoric.
If this assessment is correct, it clearly shows the left is in legitimate fear of both losing and potential retribution ( assuming the RINO group is also significantly culled)
“The illegitimate right-wing majority on the United States Supreme Court is pro-rape, pro-incest, anti-woman, and anti-child. Are you cool with that?”
Ketanji is pro-pedophile.
Help me keep track — is that pro-child, or anti-child?
In answer to your question, I don’t know. I’m not a biologist.
Some Twitter clown self-identifies as (((DeanObeidallah))). With the six parentheses and everything.
I bet he’s the noisiest in the room when someone starts picking on the Jews.
Bringing up the making of birth control illegal, I really do wonder if that will be returned to the states? Griswold versus Connecticut was every bit as bad a decision.
Griswold is unlikely to be challenged.
However, birth control has been a mixed blessing. The downside is that it empowers predatory male, and foolish female, behavior. Abortion is the backstop for birth control, and that’s why the child-sacrifice crowd is so angry.
Their real anger is toward God. He has failed to live up to their expectations.
There is a reason the years 18-27 for modern women are called the ho phase. Traditional women don’t fall into the trap of that lifestyle and there are some traditional women left so please don’t anyone project into my statement. Not every woman engages in that libertine behavior but for some the shoe definitely fits.
Predatory males? Come on now, it very definitely takes two to tango. Women choose to become ‘prey’ in your statement because they have rejected a traditional lifestyle in favor of the allure of feminism which offers them the ability to become just as sexually irresponsible as men but without the excuse of the genetic drive of men to procreate among many women.
With the additional side effect that they can get pregnant. That’s a complication no man ever had to deal with.
Alito’s opinion explicitly distinguishes Griswold and the other right to privacy cases as not implicating the rights of another living being. Repeal of birth control is another red herring.
I’ve been too tired and sick to even try to read the opinion. Thank you for the summary.
Not every bit as bad. There’s a good argument to be made that states aren’t free to just arbitrarily restrict people’s freedom, just because they feel like it. For instance to dictate to bakery workers that they may not voluntarily agree, for sufficient compensation, to terms of employment that the state thinks are too onerous. Or to dictate to married couples that they can’t use contraception. It’s ironic that the same people who celebrate Griswold denounce Lochner, since their reasoning is almost identical.
But states are certainly entitled to ban murder, rape, robbery, and other crimes that have identifiable victims. Nobody disputes that. So it makes no sense to prevent them from banning crimes against babies just because they happen to be below an arbitrary age.
“Griswold versus Connecticut was every bit as bad a decision.” Finally somebody dared to speak the truth about that decision! You are correct!
Ah, so! The string unravels. About time we recognized how much of SCOTUS jurisprudence is standing on a base of made-up law.
If this leak is not true intent of the majority, then it is a leak of villainy solely for the purpose of more turmoil and conflict domestically, ie, agitprop. Social turmoil on top of already tense conditions is the playbook of totalitarianism.
The leaker may have been a cabal. Several rabid law clerks may have orchestrated this, getting a wink and a nod from either the Wide Latina or Kagan or both.
This stunt has me puzzled. Does the leaker/s really think that stirring up the crazy lefties is gonna cause one of the five to flip? Was achieved, besides a countrywide first-hand demonstration that liberal truly is a mental illness?
Yes, they did.
Answer: yes, of course they think that two months of riots, mayhem and death threats will influence the judges – they already know that fear of riots made Roberts fold before.
obviously it’s pure villainy, an attempt to Mau-Mau the judges into changing their votes.
“An extremist Supreme Court is poised to overturn #RoeVWade and impose its far-right, unpopular views on the entire country.”
Why no, Liawatha — it’s poised to remove all federal imposition, and to allow each state decide for itself.
Oh oh — that’s freedom, isn’t it? We can’t have that!
By the way — wasn’t it your state that not only made birth control illegal, but made even talking about birth control to unmarried people a crime? Why, yes — yes it was.
This decision doesn’t impose anything on anyone. It certainly doesn’t make abortion illegal. It just makes it more complicated for these abortionists to get their way. Instead of intimidating 9 judges in SCOTUS, now they have to persuade voters themselves state by state. Just as it should be. No short cuts.
Plus if you work for Amazon, they’ll now pay your expenses to travel out of state to get an abortion.
I am unashamedly pro-abortion but if the people of a State choose to ban it, that’s their choice to make.
Their consequences to live with too.
Curious if there will be “an insurrection” at the Capitol today, with the FBI “helping”, and the CapPol inviting people inside?
And Pelosi and crew are in Ukraine visiting with the Actor to keep the grift under wraps.
Why would there be one at the Capitol? If anything there might be one at the Supreme Court.
Yes, of course, was making an analogy. They did fence off the Court building in “preparation”. Rats, weasels, and cowards. All of them.
No one should be able to tell anyone what they can or can’t do with their bodies. Period.
Except, of course, when it comes to compulsory vaxxes and mask wearing (and who’s to say they’ll stop there?)…..
There are two problems with this abortion rights trope.
First, there are more than one “body” involved.
Second, neither body belongs to itself. They both belong to God.
Look objectively at this.
“Presumably” this was circulated on 10 February ( written before then and reviewed by the author) so that’s 3 months in round figures.
That tells me the content is not that explosive ( or it would have been leaked then) and most likely has been known by both the left and the RINO since then.
If that’s correct, then this “leak” is no such thing. It is a premeditated prepackaged “crisis” waiting to be deployed.
I don’t believe in coincidence so the puppet masters ( I hope nobody believes this was accidental or “spur of the moment”- this was a planned release) decided to deploy this diversion now.
The unique thing about this is that it is an emotional plea rather than a science based appeal. That tells me the main purpose is to excite the left base and get them rioting again to force decisions.
Expect more on this.
That, or they waited to leak it until the warmer months. Warmer months bring bigger riots.
That’s kind of my thinking too, they want people out there rioting and burning down cities again to intimidate the court and distract from their failings.
Possible but that’s very unlikely- here’s why.
The left is already paying a heavy political price for those riots ( especially when compared to J6 and “Defund the Police”)
More and newer riots (with all current prevailing circumstances and conditions) would cause more damage than any imagined benefit overall to the left and its agenda. They were not prepared and have yet to negate the backlash from the last riots.
I think the left fully realizes that now.
I believe they are after an “activism riot” ( for lack of a better description) where there is a blitz on all fronts from PR to fundraising with the parallel purposes of drowning out the current issues (a diversion), intimidation of people and politicians ( fear factor) and fundraising.
Actually no they don’t. ( done a few riot control ops back in the day)
The heat actually makes the people tired faster.
In psyops- every op has a target and objective. The target group here is appears to be not as much the BLM class ( physical riot) but the Leftist Karen and Feminazi class ( financial and political riot)
If that assessment is accurate based on media reports then the end goal is to amass a war chest and drum up support either to pass some sort of legislation or prevent one from passing.
Timing based on:
1. Political bombshell in overturning both Roe and Casey which is the issue for the d/prog
2. Used to fire up and artificially motivate the d/prog base voters
3. Particularly younger voters who, according to polls, are far less supportive of Biden and d/prog than they are used to
Seems like an I/O campaign to create a reason for disenchanted younger voters (who engage in more sex and have more unplanned pregnancy) along with old school feminist (for whom Roe is akin to a sacrament) to vote instead of staying home.
Based on current available information, something along the lines of the scenario you proffered is my line of thinking also.
I suspect this “release” was designed as an emotional ploy to rally the troops but probably with more coming.
Yeah, but why leak it now instead of simply waiting for the official decision to be released in 2 months – which is closer to the election. Something doesn’t add up. That is why I am clinging to the paper recycler theory – some GS-2 or contractor saw it in the white paper bin from the court, recognized its importance, and sold it to the press.
My guess is that the left is freaking out because there isn’t a national uproar over the possibility that Roe v. Wade may be overturned. I’ve seen several articles expressing Democrats’ surprise and concern that people aren’t interested. In fact, it was Politico that just published a story on this a week ago entitled “Dems grow alarmed by lack of fear over Roe’s future”: https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/26/dems-roe-wade-future-00027932
They are probably hoping that seeing this concrete “evidence” that it is seriously being considered by the more conservative side of the bench will whip up their base. And it may.
I’m assuming it’s because once the ruling is announced it’s all over but the screaming… whereas if it gets leaked, harassment can be applied to the Court.
A couple of thoughts. 1.) There won’t be any increase in vote turnout out by itself regardless if this was released now, or in June. The motivated by this decision were coming to vote regardless.
2.) Pre-release now give an extra period to fund raise most states are still in the primary season, and you can come back and ask for more for the general after June.
3.) Probably not the most likely, but I think plausible and worthy of consideration is that the leak came from the right. With this draft out there as the worst case scenario, a decision that gives states near unlimited regulatory power at 15 weeks or even 12 will now hardly engender a response at all,
So noted. Thank you.
nnnno – the leak came from a female clerk who is a pro-abortion & gender activist.
What heavy price is the left paying? They have the presidency and own the media.
Or maybe it was done as a distraction to interrupt the march to war with Russia. The public can’t concentrate on more than one issue at a time.
That anyone can say that being anti abortion is ‘anti child’ is almost surreal in its absurdity.
Well, in one sense, any child born to one of these homicidal harpies is likely to have a moderately disadvantageous 18 year hitch.
They make it very easy to see that the leak was a purposeful call made from on high to resuscitate their dying brand and subvert the will of the lawfully appointed justices through congressional action. I never, ever want to hear about protecting the integrity of democracy from those who shamelessly grab power ever again.
you missed the best head explode. Good old Cenk.
Yeah, nothing screams legitimacy like packing a court full of ideologues and confirming them with a bare majority of one (that cackling hen of a VP).
As for the leak, I do not think it was a political motivator for the left – the decision would have been handed down months in advance of the election anyway. I believe it was an attempt at intimidation or to precipitate radical action by this congress and president to destroy the institution of SCOTUS.
Time for us to pull out Levin’s ‘Liberty amendments’ and do our own reformation of the court when the time comes. Throw in third trimester abortion ban in the constitution for good measure.
But why leak it now instead of 2 months from now when it will have more political impact on the Midterms? Maybe someone knows something we don’t – like a Senator will soon die and end the Democrat majority.
Can somebody tell me whether this document is in the format of a draft on the Court? It looks like it is formatted for publication. Do they typically format early drafts in this manner?
Yes it is
Yes they do
Now the question of legitimacy or created fake- its a 99.99% certainty this is a legitimate document for a variety of reasons but the most credible is that if it wasn’t, there would have been an immediate and emphatic rebuttal of it by both SCOTUS and DC.
We can speculate on the who/why/what end and all that but this is real as far as what it is.
Interesting that opinion drafts are circulated in a format for publication which leads me to wonder if the SCOTUS Reporter of Decisions office is where a draft opinion is formatted for publication prior to internal circulation. If the Reporter’s office is indeed the place, then it is another possible source of the leak.
What happens if the abortion question gets thrown to the States?
The States gain the power to coerce abortions. Newsome’s handlers are savvy enough to know this. It’ll happen in California in less than two years. We are looking at The Slaughter of the Innocents.
Democrats seem to despise small children.
Democrats despise everyone.
They love humanity. It’s people they hate.
Whereas in other states (Oklahoma, Texas, Florida, and others soon to follow) abortion will be outlawed in all but the most extreme of circumstances. This falls in line with what the Founding Fathers wanted: the individual states to be test beds for how to self govern and not have everything decided from on high by a remote and often uncaring Federal authority. That’s part of what’s got the left REEEEEEEing so hard today: if this rough draft really does represent the final decision then it’s an abdication of power away from the feds and back to the individual states. Power diversified and not collected in one spot where it can more easily be manipulated. Of course they are going to hate that!
One little addendum: so imagine Roe Vs Wade does get overturned. Fast forward a few decades. States like California, New York, and a few others keep abortion in place, perhaps even expand it. Some of these states were already shrinking in terms of overall population. Now states like Texas on the other hand once R Vs W gets overturned start seeing an increase in overall population and for some reason the state stays red. Cali & NY losing overall representation in the House while Texas and other red states gain representation! Boy that will drive leftists nuts!
Yeah,, but will those red states stay red with all that extra population? Speculating that far in advance is a fools errand.
Already happening. Plus, Hispanics are trending toward the right.
I’m ambivalent about the slaughter of Californians.
you perhaps refer to Mexican-Americans. There’s really no such entity as a “Hispanic” – people from Latin America aren’t an undifferentiated mass from the Rio Grande to Tierra del Fuego; they don’t have a common race, ethnicity, nationality, history, culture or socio-economic group.
No, states would not get the power to coerce abortion, for the same reason that they have no such power now.
Those are some shrill harpies barking at the moon there.
Oh, I don’t know… That one on the right with the sign… Hubba hubba!
/must I?
Except in the case of experimental vaccines? That’s ok, yes?
It’s unclear how removing Federal interference in state law constitutes imposing anything on anybody.
Abortion law in some states may become as restrictive as abortion law in France.
Baby steps, but at least they are crawling in the right direction. The standards of viability, for one, should match baby and granny. Then we proceed to acknowledge that baby and granny do not approach this limit in the same fashion, where, barring Her Choice, the baby approaches life, and granny approaches death.
if you look on social media, you will discover the name of the most likely leaker. I will not mention him here.
Even that name is rank speculation with no evidence.
“goes” I think that signpost was in the rear view mirror a long ways back.
If these mental midgets had received any education at all, they would get to work on passing laws that produced the outcome they desire..however, they prefer to spend their time ‘tantrumming’ (I have declared that this is now a verb).
Look here too https://www.dailywire.com/news/i-went-to-the-protests-at-the-supreme-court-the-viciousness-was-palpable This can only be compared to the protests about slavery prior to the commencement of the Civil War-just as Dred Scott failed to solve the issue of slavery , Roe failed to resolve the issue of abortion. Let each state decide what is proper public policy on the issue
Exploding Leftard heads,it’s bound to happen at least one more time before the end of June when NYSR&PA V Breun is announced, it’s almost as much fun as watching 4 th. of July fireworks
Heh, that decision seems to have triggered all the right people!
Gavin: “California will not sit back. We are going to fight like hell.”
Isn’t that the word that got Trump impeached?