Student Govt. at Rutgers Law School Rescinds Policy Requiring Support for Critical Race Theory
“As a public university, Rutgers is bound by the First Amendment, which prohibits discrimination based on viewpoint.”
Student groups were told to promote Critical Race Theory or lose their funding. Then FIRE got involved.
From the FIRE Newsdesk:
VICTORY: Facing public pressure, Rutgers Law Student Bar Association rescinds critical race theory requirement
Six months after passing an unconstitutional amendment that would force student groups to promote critical race theory or lose funding, Rutgers Law School-Camden’s Student Bar Association has finally done the right thing.
After facing public pressure from FIRE, the SBA met with the Rutgers administration and then sent an email to the Rutgers Law student body announcing that they rescinded the Nov. 20 amendment to the SBA constitution, which mandated that any group hoping to receive more than $250 in university funding must “plan at least one (1) event that addresses their chosen topics through the lens of Critical Race Theory, diversity and inclusion, or cultural competency.”
In yesterday’s email, SBA presidents Elena Sassaman and Ashley Zimmerman cited FIRE’s recent letter to Rutgers, which called on the school to immediately rescind the condition and commit to distributing funds in a viewpoint-neutral manner. Sassaman and Zimmerman then wrote, “We think– and we hope, we can still create change, still fight for what is right, and pass this amendment, or something similar again.”
As a public university, Rutgers is bound by the First Amendment, which prohibits discrimination based on viewpoint. The SBA’s amendment was blatantly unconstitutional because it made funding conditional upon the promotion of an ideology and would discriminate against any student group that objects to the “lens” of critical race theory or wishes to remain neutral.
The Rutgers Law SBA was right to rescind a mandate that was anything but viewpoint-neutral. Now that it’s gone, students will no longer face a choice between receiving funding and staying true to their beliefs.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
They can get away with this garbage only if we do not aggressively litigate. Fortunately, there are many “public interest” litigation mills on the right.